The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A multi centre prospective longitudinal study evaluating health related quality of life after immediate Latissimus dorsi (LD) breast reconstruction

A multi centre prospective longitudinal study evaluating health related quality of life after immediate Latissimus dorsi (LD) breast reconstruction
A multi centre prospective longitudinal study evaluating health related quality of life after immediate Latissimus dorsi (LD) breast reconstruction
Introduction: NICE recommends that the majority of women should be offered immediate breast reconstruction with its potential to improve health related quality of life (HRQL). There is conflicting evidence with a lack of ‘hard’data to best inform clinicians and their patients. Our aim was to evaluate the effects of implant-assisted LD (LDI) versus autologous LD (ALD) breast reconstruction on HRQL over 12 months. Methods: A prospective longitudinal multicentre study commenced in early 2007. Patient reported outcome measures using the EORTC C30 (general HRQL), BR-23 (breast + arm symptoms), Body Image Scale (BIS) and HADS, were completed pre-operatively and at 3, and 12 months after surgery. Longitudinal analyses tested the effects of treatment variables, baseline HRQL, age and time on QL domains (3–12 months). Significance was set at p = 0.01. Results: One hundred and seventy one patients (93 ALD, 78 LDI) were recruited. There were no significant differences in HRQL domains between LDI and ALD (±RT). Chemotherapy patients reported poorer overall HRQL (p < 0.001), poorer role (p = 0.003) and social (p = 0.01) functioning, and greater fatigue (p = 0.002) and depression (p = 0.01). Older patients had fewer HRQL issues (p = 0.01). Significant improvements over time were seen for overall HRQL and other domains (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between LDI and ALD for patient satisfaction with surgical outcome. Good satisfaction with overall breast appearance and surgical outcome was significantly associated with fewer body image concerns. Conclusion: There is an important need for cumulative clinical evidence in this field on which to base patient informed consent and clinical recommendations.
1359-6349
34-35
Winters, Z.E.
23faaa90-dba5-4fef-9a91-e0c6734f98ff
Mills, J.
a75c1b76-35a6-4bcb-8492-78b7d4e9f29b
Haviland, J.S.
569aa43b-15bd-4e9d-b4a5-e68a84334cfe
Reece-Smith, A.
9bcae778-2753-4fe2-9edb-b8be99b2c1e0
Greenslade, M.
3cf62770-3c7d-47e1-9498-64d8b874f609
Benson, J.
594e14de-a2a3-4e8e-9f74-947c50735671
Galea, M.
f501a8c2-5210-4437-9b80-5af7503218bc
McManus, P.
03faaafc-f1be-4b23-bdb2-4dacdb13e138
Nicholson, S.
a4b1adda-40f2-4b67-914a-479a951f61b5
Weiler-Mithoff, E.
752b55e9-bc51-40ce-88b6-08cb64835549
Rayter, Z.
bbeabeb6-9430-4916-bef5-da09de14b6e8
Balta, V.
fa112c6d-bfc6-4bf7-90db-39c0542c4190
Thomson, H.J.
76c8b117-93be-415f-80bb-2a25f07f89ea
Winters, Z.E.
23faaa90-dba5-4fef-9a91-e0c6734f98ff
Mills, J.
a75c1b76-35a6-4bcb-8492-78b7d4e9f29b
Haviland, J.S.
569aa43b-15bd-4e9d-b4a5-e68a84334cfe
Reece-Smith, A.
9bcae778-2753-4fe2-9edb-b8be99b2c1e0
Greenslade, M.
3cf62770-3c7d-47e1-9498-64d8b874f609
Benson, J.
594e14de-a2a3-4e8e-9f74-947c50735671
Galea, M.
f501a8c2-5210-4437-9b80-5af7503218bc
McManus, P.
03faaafc-f1be-4b23-bdb2-4dacdb13e138
Nicholson, S.
a4b1adda-40f2-4b67-914a-479a951f61b5
Weiler-Mithoff, E.
752b55e9-bc51-40ce-88b6-08cb64835549
Rayter, Z.
bbeabeb6-9430-4916-bef5-da09de14b6e8
Balta, V.
fa112c6d-bfc6-4bf7-90db-39c0542c4190
Thomson, H.J.
76c8b117-93be-415f-80bb-2a25f07f89ea

Winters, Z.E., Mills, J., Haviland, J.S., Reece-Smith, A., Greenslade, M., Benson, J., Galea, M., McManus, P., Nicholson, S., Weiler-Mithoff, E., Rayter, Z., Balta, V. and Thomson, H.J. (2010) A multi centre prospective longitudinal study evaluating health related quality of life after immediate Latissimus dorsi (LD) breast reconstruction. European Journal of Cancer Supplements, 8 (6), 34-35. (doi:10.1016/j.ejcsup.2010.06.093).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Introduction: NICE recommends that the majority of women should be offered immediate breast reconstruction with its potential to improve health related quality of life (HRQL). There is conflicting evidence with a lack of ‘hard’data to best inform clinicians and their patients. Our aim was to evaluate the effects of implant-assisted LD (LDI) versus autologous LD (ALD) breast reconstruction on HRQL over 12 months. Methods: A prospective longitudinal multicentre study commenced in early 2007. Patient reported outcome measures using the EORTC C30 (general HRQL), BR-23 (breast + arm symptoms), Body Image Scale (BIS) and HADS, were completed pre-operatively and at 3, and 12 months after surgery. Longitudinal analyses tested the effects of treatment variables, baseline HRQL, age and time on QL domains (3–12 months). Significance was set at p = 0.01. Results: One hundred and seventy one patients (93 ALD, 78 LDI) were recruited. There were no significant differences in HRQL domains between LDI and ALD (±RT). Chemotherapy patients reported poorer overall HRQL (p < 0.001), poorer role (p = 0.003) and social (p = 0.01) functioning, and greater fatigue (p = 0.002) and depression (p = 0.01). Older patients had fewer HRQL issues (p = 0.01). Significant improvements over time were seen for overall HRQL and other domains (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between LDI and ALD for patient satisfaction with surgical outcome. Good satisfaction with overall breast appearance and surgical outcome was significantly associated with fewer body image concerns. Conclusion: There is an important need for cumulative clinical evidence in this field on which to base patient informed consent and clinical recommendations.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: September 2010
Additional Information: 1st British Breast Cancer Research Conference, 15-17 September 2010, Abstracts of Submitted Papers
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 365596
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/365596
ISSN: 1359-6349
PURE UUID: 127329e3-1a6e-4f16-a98f-f518c35db7c2

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Jun 2014 10:52
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 16:58

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Z.E. Winters
Author: J. Mills
Author: J.S. Haviland
Author: A. Reece-Smith
Author: M. Greenslade
Author: J. Benson
Author: M. Galea
Author: P. McManus
Author: S. Nicholson
Author: E. Weiler-Mithoff
Author: Z. Rayter
Author: V. Balta
Author: H.J. Thomson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×