The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Interventions for preventing falls in people after stroke

Interventions for preventing falls in people after stroke
Interventions for preventing falls in people after stroke
Background: falls are one of the most common medical complications after stroke with a reported incidence of 7% in the first week after stroke onset. Studies investigating falls in the later phase after stroke report an incidence of up to 73% in the first year post-stroke.

Objectives: to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at preventing falls in people after stroke.

Search methods: we searched the trials registers of the Cochrane Stroke Group (November 2012) and the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group (May 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 5, MEDLINE (1950 to May 2012), EMBASE (1980 to May 2012), CINAHL (1982 to May 2012), PsycINFO (1806 to May 2012), AMED (1985 to May 2012) and PEDro (May 2012). We also searched trials registers, checked reference lists and contacted authors.

Selection criteria: randomised controlled trials of interventions where the primary or secondary aim was to prevent falls in people after stroke.

Data collection and analysis: review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, assessed trial quality, and extracted data. We used a rate ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) to compare the rate of falls (e.g. falls per person year) between intervention and control groups. For risk of falling we used a risk ratio and 95% CI based on the number of people falling (fallers) in each group. We pooled results where appropriate.

Main results: we included 10 studies with a total of 1004 participants. One study evaluated the effect of exercises in the acute and subacute phase after stroke but found no significant difference in rate of falls (rate ratio 0.92, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.90, 95 participants). The pooled result of four studies investigating the effect of exercises on preventing falls in the chronic phase also found no significant difference for rate of falls (rate ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.38, 412 participants).

For number of fallers, one study examined the effect of exercises in the acute and subacute phase after stroke but found no significant difference between the intervention and control group (risk ratio 1.19, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.71, 95 participants). The pooled result of six studies examining the effect of exercises in the chronic phase also found no significant difference in number of fallers between the intervention and control groups (risk ratio 1.02, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.24, 616 participants).

The rate of falls and the number of fallers was significantly reduced in two studies evaluating the effect of medication on preventing falls; one study (85 participants) compared vitamin D versus placebo in institutionalised women after stroke with low vitamin D levels, and the other study (79 participants) evaluated alendronate versus alphacalcidol in hospitalised people after stroke.

One study provided single lens distance glasses to regular wearers of multifocal glasses. In a subgroup of 46 participants post-stroke there was no significant difference in the rate of falls (rate ratio 1.08, 95% CI 0.52 to 2.25) or the number of fallers between both groups (risk ratio 0.74, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.18).

Authors' conclusions: there is currently insufficient evidence that exercises or prescription of single lens glasses to multifocal users prevent falls or decrease the number of people falling after being discharged from rehabilitation following their stroke. Two studies testing vitamin D versus placebo and alendronate versus alphacalcidol found a significant reduction in falls and the number of people falling. However, these findings should be replicated before the results are implemented in clinical practice
1469-493X
CD008728
Verheyden, G.S.A.F
53078d60-e433-480b-9619-ca6063604617
Weerdesteyn, V.
540c1e04-cf4a-4258-b00f-81a68173cd9b
Pickering, R.M.
4a828314-7ddf-4f96-abed-3407017d4c90
Kunkel, D.
df806f83-0705-4084-bf14-d86f7cfb65af
Lennon, S.
bcc5f473-b6d2-4e68-8349-2e0c500a7d61
Geurts, A.C.H.
d6cd8ff0-6488-4ba9-a315-8796ffc1c48b
Ashburn, A.
818b9ce8-f025-429e-9532-43ee4fd5f991
Verheyden, G.S.A.F
53078d60-e433-480b-9619-ca6063604617
Weerdesteyn, V.
540c1e04-cf4a-4258-b00f-81a68173cd9b
Pickering, R.M.
4a828314-7ddf-4f96-abed-3407017d4c90
Kunkel, D.
df806f83-0705-4084-bf14-d86f7cfb65af
Lennon, S.
bcc5f473-b6d2-4e68-8349-2e0c500a7d61
Geurts, A.C.H.
d6cd8ff0-6488-4ba9-a315-8796ffc1c48b
Ashburn, A.
818b9ce8-f025-429e-9532-43ee4fd5f991

Verheyden, G.S.A.F, Weerdesteyn, V., Pickering, R.M., Kunkel, D., Lennon, S., Geurts, A.C.H. and Ashburn, A. (2013) Interventions for preventing falls in people after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 5, CD008728. (doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008728.pub2).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: falls are one of the most common medical complications after stroke with a reported incidence of 7% in the first week after stroke onset. Studies investigating falls in the later phase after stroke report an incidence of up to 73% in the first year post-stroke.

Objectives: to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at preventing falls in people after stroke.

Search methods: we searched the trials registers of the Cochrane Stroke Group (November 2012) and the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group (May 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 5, MEDLINE (1950 to May 2012), EMBASE (1980 to May 2012), CINAHL (1982 to May 2012), PsycINFO (1806 to May 2012), AMED (1985 to May 2012) and PEDro (May 2012). We also searched trials registers, checked reference lists and contacted authors.

Selection criteria: randomised controlled trials of interventions where the primary or secondary aim was to prevent falls in people after stroke.

Data collection and analysis: review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, assessed trial quality, and extracted data. We used a rate ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) to compare the rate of falls (e.g. falls per person year) between intervention and control groups. For risk of falling we used a risk ratio and 95% CI based on the number of people falling (fallers) in each group. We pooled results where appropriate.

Main results: we included 10 studies with a total of 1004 participants. One study evaluated the effect of exercises in the acute and subacute phase after stroke but found no significant difference in rate of falls (rate ratio 0.92, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.90, 95 participants). The pooled result of four studies investigating the effect of exercises on preventing falls in the chronic phase also found no significant difference for rate of falls (rate ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.38, 412 participants).

For number of fallers, one study examined the effect of exercises in the acute and subacute phase after stroke but found no significant difference between the intervention and control group (risk ratio 1.19, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.71, 95 participants). The pooled result of six studies examining the effect of exercises in the chronic phase also found no significant difference in number of fallers between the intervention and control groups (risk ratio 1.02, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.24, 616 participants).

The rate of falls and the number of fallers was significantly reduced in two studies evaluating the effect of medication on preventing falls; one study (85 participants) compared vitamin D versus placebo in institutionalised women after stroke with low vitamin D levels, and the other study (79 participants) evaluated alendronate versus alphacalcidol in hospitalised people after stroke.

One study provided single lens distance glasses to regular wearers of multifocal glasses. In a subgroup of 46 participants post-stroke there was no significant difference in the rate of falls (rate ratio 1.08, 95% CI 0.52 to 2.25) or the number of fallers between both groups (risk ratio 0.74, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.18).

Authors' conclusions: there is currently insufficient evidence that exercises or prescription of single lens glasses to multifocal users prevent falls or decrease the number of people falling after being discharged from rehabilitation following their stroke. Two studies testing vitamin D versus placebo and alendronate versus alphacalcidol found a significant reduction in falls and the number of people falling. However, these findings should be replicated before the results are implemented in clinical practice

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: 2013
Organisations: Primary Care & Population Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 365936
URI: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/365936
ISSN: 1469-493X
PURE UUID: d00677d6-7133-4c9f-969c-e3f212c9395e

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Jun 2014 11:11
Last modified: 05 Oct 2018 12:09

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: G.S.A.F Verheyden
Author: V. Weerdesteyn
Author: R.M. Pickering
Author: D. Kunkel
Author: S. Lennon
Author: A.C.H. Geurts
Author: A. Ashburn

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×