The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Comparison of instruments for particle number size distribution measurements in air quality monitoring

Comparison of instruments for particle number size distribution measurements in air quality monitoring
Comparison of instruments for particle number size distribution measurements in air quality monitoring
Number size distributions of airborne particles are relevant to fields including ambient monitoring, pharmaceutical and automotive measurements. A number of commercially available instruments can be used to determine particle number size distributions including the Electrical Low Pressure Impactor (ELPI), Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (SMPS), Fast Mobility Particle Sizer (FMPS) and the Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS). The comparability of the data provided by these instruments has not been fully tested for different kinds of aerosols. This study compared number size distributions of laboratory generated aerosols (TiO2, NaCl, fumed silica and soot) in a wind tunnel. Reasonable agreement was noted between the different instruments, though there were divergences. For example the ELPI was inconsistent at the upper and lower limits of its working size (at low concentrations). Instruments responded variably to different particle types, which has important implications for sampling heterogeneous particle mixtures such as those found in urban air. This study highlights the need for caution when comparing data obtained from different particle instruments, and demonstrates the requirement for further comparison studies in controlled settings using an assortment of particle types with the aim to standardise and harmonise particle sampling protocols.

0021-8502
48-55
Price, Heather
4d3a250f-c7c6-4b2f-8136-fe4df0acd284
Stahlmecke, B.
285782cb-6c32-4e8b-842e-318edba3711f
Arthur, R.
ce670138-5f7a-49a6-b33a-a1438e29246f
Kaminski, H.
6ebbe235-daf4-4228-bc41-5270ff2b706f
Lindermann, J.
b1c4a4a8-3372-42d4-a8e6-ef84a1336dfc
Dauber, E.
1400e54f-039f-4454-abf7-c75be9506c0a
Asbach, C.
b2e466f4-e91a-45d2-a712-ee9672a7186e
Kuhlbusch, T.
aab06168-6a23-40bd-932f-a834c4da71b6
BeruBe, K.
83871914-9f8f-4c5e-8640-c17666c3c15b
Jones, T.
bf04d9bf-15e9-416a-a4cb-e8d418068b81
Price, Heather
4d3a250f-c7c6-4b2f-8136-fe4df0acd284
Stahlmecke, B.
285782cb-6c32-4e8b-842e-318edba3711f
Arthur, R.
ce670138-5f7a-49a6-b33a-a1438e29246f
Kaminski, H.
6ebbe235-daf4-4228-bc41-5270ff2b706f
Lindermann, J.
b1c4a4a8-3372-42d4-a8e6-ef84a1336dfc
Dauber, E.
1400e54f-039f-4454-abf7-c75be9506c0a
Asbach, C.
b2e466f4-e91a-45d2-a712-ee9672a7186e
Kuhlbusch, T.
aab06168-6a23-40bd-932f-a834c4da71b6
BeruBe, K.
83871914-9f8f-4c5e-8640-c17666c3c15b
Jones, T.
bf04d9bf-15e9-416a-a4cb-e8d418068b81

Price, Heather, Stahlmecke, B., Arthur, R., Kaminski, H., Lindermann, J., Dauber, E., Asbach, C., Kuhlbusch, T., BeruBe, K. and Jones, T. (2014) Comparison of instruments for particle number size distribution measurements in air quality monitoring. Journal of Aerosol Science, 76, 48-55. (doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2014.05.001).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Number size distributions of airborne particles are relevant to fields including ambient monitoring, pharmaceutical and automotive measurements. A number of commercially available instruments can be used to determine particle number size distributions including the Electrical Low Pressure Impactor (ELPI), Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (SMPS), Fast Mobility Particle Sizer (FMPS) and the Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS). The comparability of the data provided by these instruments has not been fully tested for different kinds of aerosols. This study compared number size distributions of laboratory generated aerosols (TiO2, NaCl, fumed silica and soot) in a wind tunnel. Reasonable agreement was noted between the different instruments, though there were divergences. For example the ELPI was inconsistent at the upper and lower limits of its working size (at low concentrations). Instruments responded variably to different particle types, which has important implications for sampling heterogeneous particle mixtures such as those found in urban air. This study highlights the need for caution when comparing data obtained from different particle instruments, and demonstrates the requirement for further comparison studies in controlled settings using an assortment of particle types with the aim to standardise and harmonise particle sampling protocols.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 20 May 2014
Published date: August 2014
Organisations: Population, Health & Wellbeing (PHeW)

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 365957
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/365957
ISSN: 0021-8502
PURE UUID: ef58de57-5c8c-4250-99e9-a66545570640

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Jun 2014 09:49
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 17:03

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Heather Price
Author: B. Stahlmecke
Author: R. Arthur
Author: H. Kaminski
Author: J. Lindermann
Author: E. Dauber
Author: C. Asbach
Author: T. Kuhlbusch
Author: K. BeruBe
Author: T. Jones

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×