The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Socio-economic status, ethnicity and geographical variations in acceptance rates for renal replacement therapy in England and Wales: an ecological study

Socio-economic status, ethnicity and geographical variations in acceptance rates for renal replacement therapy in England and Wales: an ecological study
Socio-economic status, ethnicity and geographical variations in acceptance rates for renal replacement therapy in England and Wales: an ecological study
Background

It is not known to what extent the reported regional variations in renal replacement therapy (RRT) acceptance rates in England and Wales are due to differences in the socio-demographic characteristics of the population.

Methods

The authors calculated age–gender indirectly standardised RRT rates in 2007 for Primary Care Trusts (PCT)/Local Health Boards (LHB) in England and Wales and Government Office Regions (GOR) in England. Multivariable Poisson regression was used to examine the regional variations in the age–gender standardised RRT rates before and after adjustment for area deprivation (Townsend index) and the proportion of non-white people living in an area.

Results

Increasing deprivation of PCT/LHB was associated with higher RRT acceptance rates. RRT rates were higher in PCTs with a greater proportion of non-white people in England (correlation coefficient 0.60, p<0.001) but not in Wales. There were variations in the age–gender standardised RRT rates between PCT/LHBs in England and Wales. Adjusting for deprivation and the proportion of non-white people attenuated the high RRT rate ratio observed in London and West Midlands, but the RRT acceptance rate ratio (95% CI) remained higher in Wales 1.38 (1.22 to 1.57) and lower in North West England 0.82 (0.74 to 0.93) and Yorkshire and Humberside 0.86 (0.77 to 0.98).

Conclusions

This study highlights that RRT acceptance rates are positively associated with social deprivation and the proportion of non-white people in a PCT/LHB, but regional variations in RRT acceptance rates still persist despite taking these into account. Further study is required to understand the extent to which these differences reflect variation in underlying need or provision of care.
0143-005X
535-541
Udayaraj, U.P.
603dc11a-0f94-4dd9-bfc6-b437ee6d4baa
Ben-Shlomo, Y.
920afa6a-6f07-48ff-a238-24fd5cdd1638
Roderick, P.
dbb3cd11-4c51-4844-982b-0eb30ad5085a
Casula, A.
cad55ed0-c8bc-4219-a528-a1b8351177fa
Ansell, D.
4849c1d3-9ff9-46ac-91e5-b4c6d7a6b52f
Tomson, C.R.
07093fef-bd56-422a-af11-1dd093abac04
Caskey, F.J.
ebe2c431-e2f3-4ca0-aff7-ab6a5fabaf75
Udayaraj, U.P.
603dc11a-0f94-4dd9-bfc6-b437ee6d4baa
Ben-Shlomo, Y.
920afa6a-6f07-48ff-a238-24fd5cdd1638
Roderick, P.
dbb3cd11-4c51-4844-982b-0eb30ad5085a
Casula, A.
cad55ed0-c8bc-4219-a528-a1b8351177fa
Ansell, D.
4849c1d3-9ff9-46ac-91e5-b4c6d7a6b52f
Tomson, C.R.
07093fef-bd56-422a-af11-1dd093abac04
Caskey, F.J.
ebe2c431-e2f3-4ca0-aff7-ab6a5fabaf75

Udayaraj, U.P., Ben-Shlomo, Y., Roderick, P., Casula, A., Ansell, D., Tomson, C.R. and Caskey, F.J. (2010) Socio-economic status, ethnicity and geographical variations in acceptance rates for renal replacement therapy in England and Wales: an ecological study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 64 (6), 535-541. (doi:10.1136/jech.2009.093518).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background

It is not known to what extent the reported regional variations in renal replacement therapy (RRT) acceptance rates in England and Wales are due to differences in the socio-demographic characteristics of the population.

Methods

The authors calculated age–gender indirectly standardised RRT rates in 2007 for Primary Care Trusts (PCT)/Local Health Boards (LHB) in England and Wales and Government Office Regions (GOR) in England. Multivariable Poisson regression was used to examine the regional variations in the age–gender standardised RRT rates before and after adjustment for area deprivation (Townsend index) and the proportion of non-white people living in an area.

Results

Increasing deprivation of PCT/LHB was associated with higher RRT acceptance rates. RRT rates were higher in PCTs with a greater proportion of non-white people in England (correlation coefficient 0.60, p<0.001) but not in Wales. There were variations in the age–gender standardised RRT rates between PCT/LHBs in England and Wales. Adjusting for deprivation and the proportion of non-white people attenuated the high RRT rate ratio observed in London and West Midlands, but the RRT acceptance rate ratio (95% CI) remained higher in Wales 1.38 (1.22 to 1.57) and lower in North West England 0.82 (0.74 to 0.93) and Yorkshire and Humberside 0.86 (0.77 to 0.98).

Conclusions

This study highlights that RRT acceptance rates are positively associated with social deprivation and the proportion of non-white people in a PCT/LHB, but regional variations in RRT acceptance rates still persist despite taking these into account. Further study is required to understand the extent to which these differences reflect variation in underlying need or provision of care.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 23 October 2010
Organisations: Primary Care & Population Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 366120
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/366120
ISSN: 0143-005X
PURE UUID: 0423a10d-72bc-4fc9-8802-b56ca41e8505
ORCID for P. Roderick: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9475-6850

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Jun 2014 12:54
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:49

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: U.P. Udayaraj
Author: Y. Ben-Shlomo
Author: P. Roderick ORCID iD
Author: A. Casula
Author: D. Ansell
Author: C.R. Tomson
Author: F.J. Caskey

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×