The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Rural:urban inequalities in post 2015 targets and indicators for drinking-water

Rural:urban inequalities in post 2015 targets and indicators for drinking-water
Rural:urban inequalities in post 2015 targets and indicators for drinking-water
Disparities in access to drinking water between rural and urban areas are pronounced. Although use of improved
sources has increased more rapidly in rural areas, rising from 62% in 1990 to 81% in 2011, the proportion of the
rural population using an improved water source remains substantially lower than in urban areas. Inequalities in
coverage are compounded by disparities in other aspects of water service. Not all improved sources are safe and
evidence from a systematic review demonstrates that water is more likely to contain detectable fecal indicator
bacteria in rural areas. Piped water on premises is a service enjoyed primarily by those living in urban areas so
differentiating amongst improved sources would exacerbate rural:urban disparities yet further. We argue that an urban bias may have resulted due to apparent stagnation in urban coverage and the inequity observed between urban and peri-urban areas. The apparent stagnation at around 95% coverage in urban areas stems in part from relative population growth – over the last two decades more people gained access to improved water in urban areas. There are calls for setting higher standards in urban areas which would exacerbate the already extreme rural disadvantage. Instead of setting different targets, health, economic, and human rights perspectives, we suggest that the focus should be kept on achieving universal access to safewater (primarily in rural areas) while monitoring progress towards higher service levels, including greater water safety (both in rural and urban areas and among different economic strata).
0048-9697
509-513
Bain, R.
ad9d875b-1b72-4018-a0b4-e1d872e6d039
Wright, J.A.
94990ecf-f8dd-4649-84f2-b28bf272e464
Christenson, E.
68cb3b18-d8ec-43c6-83c1-0a4861671e6b
Bartram, J.
89ea4745-2e0b-41c7-bcb7-909ff36fa902
Bain, R.
ad9d875b-1b72-4018-a0b4-e1d872e6d039
Wright, J.A.
94990ecf-f8dd-4649-84f2-b28bf272e464
Christenson, E.
68cb3b18-d8ec-43c6-83c1-0a4861671e6b
Bartram, J.
89ea4745-2e0b-41c7-bcb7-909ff36fa902

Bain, R., Wright, J.A., Christenson, E. and Bartram, J. (2014) Rural:urban inequalities in post 2015 targets and indicators for drinking-water. Science of the Total Environment, 490, 509-513. (doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.05.007).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Disparities in access to drinking water between rural and urban areas are pronounced. Although use of improved
sources has increased more rapidly in rural areas, rising from 62% in 1990 to 81% in 2011, the proportion of the
rural population using an improved water source remains substantially lower than in urban areas. Inequalities in
coverage are compounded by disparities in other aspects of water service. Not all improved sources are safe and
evidence from a systematic review demonstrates that water is more likely to contain detectable fecal indicator
bacteria in rural areas. Piped water on premises is a service enjoyed primarily by those living in urban areas so
differentiating amongst improved sources would exacerbate rural:urban disparities yet further. We argue that an urban bias may have resulted due to apparent stagnation in urban coverage and the inequity observed between urban and peri-urban areas. The apparent stagnation at around 95% coverage in urban areas stems in part from relative population growth – over the last two decades more people gained access to improved water in urban areas. There are calls for setting higher standards in urban areas which would exacerbate the already extreme rural disadvantage. Instead of setting different targets, health, economic, and human rights perspectives, we suggest that the focus should be kept on achieving universal access to safewater (primarily in rural areas) while monitoring progress towards higher service levels, including greater water safety (both in rural and urban areas and among different economic strata).

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: July 2014
Organisations: Population, Health & Wellbeing (PHeW)

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 366618
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/366618
ISSN: 0048-9697
PURE UUID: abe58dcc-c43f-4763-914d-27cb7927a58a
ORCID for J.A. Wright: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8842-2181

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Jul 2014 14:39
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:21

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: R. Bain
Author: J.A. Wright ORCID iD
Author: E. Christenson
Author: J. Bartram

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×