The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Measuring the healthfulness of food retail stores: variations by store type and neighbourhood deprivation

Measuring the healthfulness of food retail stores: variations by store type and neighbourhood deprivation
Measuring the healthfulness of food retail stores: variations by store type and neighbourhood deprivation
Background: The consumer nutrition environment has been conceptualised as in-store environmental factors that influence food shopping habits. More healthful in-store environments could be characterised as those which promote healthful food choices such as selling good quality healthy foods or placing them in prominent locations to prompt purchasing. Research measuring the full-range of in-store environmental factors concurrently is limited.

Purpose: To develop a summary score of 'healthfulness' composed of nine in-store factors that influence food shopping behaviour, and to assess this score by store type and neighbourhood deprivation.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 601 retail food stores, including supermarkets, grocery stores and convenience stores, was completed in Hampshire, United Kingdom between July 2010 and June 2011. The survey measured nine variables (variety, price, quality, promotions, shelf placement, store placement, nutrition information, healthier alternatives and single fruit sale) to assess the healthfulness of retail food stores on seven healthy and five less healthy foods that are markers of diet quality. Four steps were completed to create nine individual variable scores and another three to create an overall score of healthfulness for each store.

Results: Analysis of variance showed strong evidence of a difference in overall healthfulness by store type (p < 0.001). Large and premium supermarkets offered the most healthful shopping environments for consumers. Discount supermarkets, 'world', convenience and petrol stores offered less healthful environments to consumers however there was variation across the healthfulness spectrum. No relationship between overall healthfulness and neighbourhood deprivation was observed (p = 0.1).

Conclusions: A new composite measure of nine variables that can influence food choices was developed to provide an overall assessment of the healthfulness of retail food stores. This composite score could be useful in future research to measure the relationship between main food store and quality of diet, and to evaluate the effects of multi-component food environment interventions.
food environment, consumer nutrition environment, diet quality, dietary inequalities
1479-5868
69-[24pp]
Black, Christina
768f1dcd-2697-4aae-95cc-ee2f6d63dff5
Ntani, Georgia
9b009e0a-5ab2-4c6e-a9fd-15a601e92be5
Inskip, Hazel
5fb4470a-9379-49b2-a533-9da8e61058b7
Cooper, Cyrus
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Cummins, Steven
af945c4e-6089-4698-bf10-3d0db8d63307
Moon, Graham
68cffc4d-72c1-41e9-b1fa-1570c5f3a0b4
Baird, Janis
f4bf2039-6118-436f-ab69-df8b4d17f824
Black, Christina
768f1dcd-2697-4aae-95cc-ee2f6d63dff5
Ntani, Georgia
9b009e0a-5ab2-4c6e-a9fd-15a601e92be5
Inskip, Hazel
5fb4470a-9379-49b2-a533-9da8e61058b7
Cooper, Cyrus
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Cummins, Steven
af945c4e-6089-4698-bf10-3d0db8d63307
Moon, Graham
68cffc4d-72c1-41e9-b1fa-1570c5f3a0b4
Baird, Janis
f4bf2039-6118-436f-ab69-df8b4d17f824

Black, Christina, Ntani, Georgia, Inskip, Hazel, Cooper, Cyrus, Cummins, Steven, Moon, Graham and Baird, Janis (2014) Measuring the healthfulness of food retail stores: variations by store type and neighbourhood deprivation. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 11 (1), 69-[24pp]. (doi:10.1186/1479-5868-11-69).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: The consumer nutrition environment has been conceptualised as in-store environmental factors that influence food shopping habits. More healthful in-store environments could be characterised as those which promote healthful food choices such as selling good quality healthy foods or placing them in prominent locations to prompt purchasing. Research measuring the full-range of in-store environmental factors concurrently is limited.

Purpose: To develop a summary score of 'healthfulness' composed of nine in-store factors that influence food shopping behaviour, and to assess this score by store type and neighbourhood deprivation.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 601 retail food stores, including supermarkets, grocery stores and convenience stores, was completed in Hampshire, United Kingdom between July 2010 and June 2011. The survey measured nine variables (variety, price, quality, promotions, shelf placement, store placement, nutrition information, healthier alternatives and single fruit sale) to assess the healthfulness of retail food stores on seven healthy and five less healthy foods that are markers of diet quality. Four steps were completed to create nine individual variable scores and another three to create an overall score of healthfulness for each store.

Results: Analysis of variance showed strong evidence of a difference in overall healthfulness by store type (p < 0.001). Large and premium supermarkets offered the most healthful shopping environments for consumers. Discount supermarkets, 'world', convenience and petrol stores offered less healthful environments to consumers however there was variation across the healthfulness spectrum. No relationship between overall healthfulness and neighbourhood deprivation was observed (p = 0.1).

Conclusions: A new composite measure of nine variables that can influence food choices was developed to provide an overall assessment of the healthfulness of retail food stores. This composite score could be useful in future research to measure the relationship between main food store and quality of diet, and to evaluate the effects of multi-component food environment interventions.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 13 May 2014
e-pub ahead of print date: 23 May 2014
Published date: 23 May 2014
Keywords: food environment, consumer nutrition environment, diet quality, dietary inequalities
Organisations: Population, Health & Wellbeing (PHeW)

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 366894
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/366894
ISSN: 1479-5868
PURE UUID: aa6fa046-1bf6-4c1d-b9d9-fc85cec62972
ORCID for Christina Black: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3897-3786
ORCID for Hazel Inskip: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8897-1749
ORCID for Cyrus Cooper: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-0709
ORCID for Graham Moon: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7256-8397
ORCID for Janis Baird: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4039-4361

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Jul 2014 12:10
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:15

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Christina Black ORCID iD
Author: Georgia Ntani
Author: Hazel Inskip ORCID iD
Author: Cyrus Cooper ORCID iD
Author: Steven Cummins
Author: Graham Moon ORCID iD
Author: Janis Baird ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×