The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A self-report study of factors influencing decision-making at rail level crossings: comparing car drivers, motorcyclists, cyclists and pedestrians

A self-report study of factors influencing decision-making at rail level crossings: comparing car drivers, motorcyclists, cyclists and pedestrians
A self-report study of factors influencing decision-making at rail level crossings: comparing car drivers, motorcyclists, cyclists and pedestrians
Collisions at rail level crossings (RLXs) represent a major challenge for both road safety and rail safety professionals. RLX collisions are typically high-severity and high-cost, often involving multiple injuries and/or fatalities as well as major disruptions to the transportation network. Most research examining road users’ behaviour at RLXs has focused exclusively on drivers and consequently there is little existing knowledge on how other road users make decisions at RLXs. We designed a longitudinal survey to prospectively record interactions at RLXs over a two-week period. The sample included 166 adults residing in metropolitan Melbourne (80%) and regional Victoria (20%), with a mix of car drivers, motorcyclists, bicyclists and pedestrians. Respondents completed the survey daily and provided a detailed account of any encounters with trains and/or activated RLX warnings, with the survey prompts based on a cognitive task analysis methodology. The results reveal that both experiences and behaviour at RLXs differ substantially across different road users. Visual information (e.g., flashing lights) emerged as one of the most influential factors for car drivers and motorcyclists, whereas pedestrians and to a lesser extent cyclists relied more on auditory information (e.g., bells) to alert them to the presence of a train. Pedestrians were also more likely than other road users to speed up and cross the tracks ahead of an approaching train. Overall these results emphasise the importance of designing road systems to support cognition and behaviour across a range of road users, in order to ensure a safe system for all
1-11
Stanton, Neville A.
351a44ab-09a0-422a-a738-01df1fe0fadd
Beanland, V.
db90a568-d5cd-4a45-9fc7-1d73ca66f0e2
Lenne, M.G.
885d4396-ec78-4bf9-aac3-c7fb4eb414ae
Salmon, P.M.
e96abc65-12e8-4c75-8c1c-1cb986e0492f
Stanton, Neville A.
351a44ab-09a0-422a-a738-01df1fe0fadd
Beanland, V.
db90a568-d5cd-4a45-9fc7-1d73ca66f0e2
Lenne, M.G.
885d4396-ec78-4bf9-aac3-c7fb4eb414ae
Salmon, P.M.
e96abc65-12e8-4c75-8c1c-1cb986e0492f

Stanton, Neville A., Beanland, V., Lenne, M.G. and Salmon, P.M. (2013) A self-report study of factors influencing decision-making at rail level crossings: comparing car drivers, motorcyclists, cyclists and pedestrians. Australasian Road Safety Research Policing Education Conferenc, Brisbane, Australia. 28 - 30 Aug 2013. pp. 1-11 .

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

Collisions at rail level crossings (RLXs) represent a major challenge for both road safety and rail safety professionals. RLX collisions are typically high-severity and high-cost, often involving multiple injuries and/or fatalities as well as major disruptions to the transportation network. Most research examining road users’ behaviour at RLXs has focused exclusively on drivers and consequently there is little existing knowledge on how other road users make decisions at RLXs. We designed a longitudinal survey to prospectively record interactions at RLXs over a two-week period. The sample included 166 adults residing in metropolitan Melbourne (80%) and regional Victoria (20%), with a mix of car drivers, motorcyclists, bicyclists and pedestrians. Respondents completed the survey daily and provided a detailed account of any encounters with trains and/or activated RLX warnings, with the survey prompts based on a cognitive task analysis methodology. The results reveal that both experiences and behaviour at RLXs differ substantially across different road users. Visual information (e.g., flashing lights) emerged as one of the most influential factors for car drivers and motorcyclists, whereas pedestrians and to a lesser extent cyclists relied more on auditory information (e.g., bells) to alert them to the presence of a train. Pedestrians were also more likely than other road users to speed up and cross the tracks ahead of an approaching train. Overall these results emphasise the importance of designing road systems to support cognition and behaviour across a range of road users, in order to ensure a safe system for all

Text
__soton.ac.uk_ude_personalfiles_users_jr1d11_mydesktop_ePrints_A self-report study of factors influencing decision-making at rail level crossings.pdf - Other
Download (482kB)

More information

Published date: 2013
Venue - Dates: Australasian Road Safety Research Policing Education Conferenc, Brisbane, Australia, 2013-08-28 - 2013-08-30
Organisations: Transportation Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 366896
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/366896
PURE UUID: 6458caa1-7209-45b0-ae7b-fd6ccd207a30
ORCID for Neville A. Stanton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8562-3279

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Jul 2014 08:14
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:33

Export record

Contributors

Author: V. Beanland
Author: M.G. Lenne
Author: P.M. Salmon

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×