Men and measures: capturing knowledge requirements in firms through qualitative system modelling
Men and measures: capturing knowledge requirements in firms through qualitative system modelling
Knowledge Management (KM) is an issue of great and increasing importance in most if not all areas of managerial endeavour. In this paper, we are concerned with the particular practical difficulty within KM of mapping knowledge in a managed system. This is an important practical issue because without a view of the terrain of explicit and tacit knowledge in the managed system, we have little prospect of planning our managerial interaction. Few if any practical methods exist which reflect the strongly systemic nature of business organizations. We begin by establishing our position with regard to the numerous definitions and perspectives of knowledge in managed systems, and indeed in regard to the disagreements that rack KM over the nature of knowledge itself, where it lies and the role of humans as creators, users and guardians of that knowledge. We relate the nature of system knowledge to well-known taxonomies of knowing what, knowing how, knowing why, knowing who together with the integrated from of knowing in the managed system as a whole. The method presented, Systems Based KM (or SBKM), is based on a non-positivist qualitative method deriving from System Dynamics and it is presented through the medium of a case study of a professional firm.
knowledge management, systems thinking, system dynamics, strategy
10-21
Swart, J.
72f4b913-cde3-44f3-8288-a9af0afe3769
Powell, J.H.
5b4db071-6f39-4059-a2b2-b751b70291f0
January 2006
Swart, J.
72f4b913-cde3-44f3-8288-a9af0afe3769
Powell, J.H.
5b4db071-6f39-4059-a2b2-b751b70291f0
Swart, J. and Powell, J.H.
(2006)
Men and measures: capturing knowledge requirements in firms through qualitative system modelling.
Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57 (1), .
(doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601983).
Abstract
Knowledge Management (KM) is an issue of great and increasing importance in most if not all areas of managerial endeavour. In this paper, we are concerned with the particular practical difficulty within KM of mapping knowledge in a managed system. This is an important practical issue because without a view of the terrain of explicit and tacit knowledge in the managed system, we have little prospect of planning our managerial interaction. Few if any practical methods exist which reflect the strongly systemic nature of business organizations. We begin by establishing our position with regard to the numerous definitions and perspectives of knowledge in managed systems, and indeed in regard to the disagreements that rack KM over the nature of knowledge itself, where it lies and the role of humans as creators, users and guardians of that knowledge. We relate the nature of system knowledge to well-known taxonomies of knowing what, knowing how, knowing why, knowing who together with the integrated from of knowing in the managed system as a whole. The method presented, Systems Based KM (or SBKM), is based on a non-positivist qualitative method deriving from System Dynamics and it is presented through the medium of a case study of a professional firm.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: January 2006
Keywords:
knowledge management, systems thinking, system dynamics, strategy
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 36720
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/36720
ISSN: 0160-5682
PURE UUID: dd7d25cd-d3ad-4dd4-9aa5-94970201618b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Jun 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:57
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
J. Swart
Author:
J.H. Powell
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics