The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Language shibboleths, conversational code breaking, and moral deviance: articulating immorality in the novels of Frances Burney

Language shibboleths, conversational code breaking, and moral deviance: articulating immorality in the novels of Frances Burney
Language shibboleths, conversational code breaking, and moral deviance: articulating immorality in the novels of Frances Burney
Burney’s fictional speech has been recognized as idiosyncratic, subjective, sociolectic, and influential of later writers, but no focused study has been carried out to flesh out such features of her work. Further, Burney’s use of dialogue as an index of morality has not been subject to detailed analytical attention. It is timely therefore to carry out such a study, and logical to draw on the methods of modern linguistics, the frameworks and vocabulary of which have proved very useful, though such hybrid approaches are still relatively unexplored in literary criticism. My thesis addresses such omissions.

This thesis examines decentralized voices in Burney’s fiction, which articulate alternative moral values to those endorsed by the main narrators and central protagonists. Examination establishes that Burney drew on various literary and extraliterary genres, actively selecting and shaping the language and speech patterns of her characters to create rapid inferential access to their subjective space. In doing so she interacted with disparate debates carried out over various discursive fields, tapping into her readers’ assumptions and knowledge of the real world, and inviting them to recover meanings from her represented speech. My study begins with two main sources of recuperation. One concerns contemporary debates about morality, carried out mainly in philosophical treatises, but disseminated in numerous texts, defining how to live a good life, and measuring potential effects of environment against innate qualities. Another source concerns language itself, which was a locus of contention during the eighteenth century, under pressure from various sources during the years when Burney published her novels: from those seeking to establish standard grammatical forms; from the challenges of shifting views on politeness and sensibility; from anxieties about class, gender, and nation; and from evolving concerns about affectation and deceit, as well as about any language which carried ‘palpable designs’. Engaging closely with the novels themselves, this thesis explores Burney’s use of dialogue as a platform, to engage with these kind of social, gender, and politeness issues. Further, this study reveals Burney’s ability to use conservative ideas about language in order to disrupt reader expectations, and to raise questions about the ownership of language styles and even whole genres, while proclaiming her own professionalism, and right of involvement in a literary and ethical life.
Davidson, Christina
37cf1a40-448b-48e3-b730-bc6e574501da
Davidson, Christina
37cf1a40-448b-48e3-b730-bc6e574501da
Bygrave, Stephen
c0c3f93a-dab5-4674-aa79-072f4dc11233
Dow, Gillian
99725015-9c49-4358-a5b0-9a75f0b120fb
Stevenson, Patrick
7b8878de-4a5b-4eaf-88d2-034d9041f41d

Davidson, Christina (2012) Language shibboleths, conversational code breaking, and moral deviance: articulating immorality in the novels of Frances Burney. University of Southampton, Faculty of Humanities, Doctoral Thesis, 313pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Burney’s fictional speech has been recognized as idiosyncratic, subjective, sociolectic, and influential of later writers, but no focused study has been carried out to flesh out such features of her work. Further, Burney’s use of dialogue as an index of morality has not been subject to detailed analytical attention. It is timely therefore to carry out such a study, and logical to draw on the methods of modern linguistics, the frameworks and vocabulary of which have proved very useful, though such hybrid approaches are still relatively unexplored in literary criticism. My thesis addresses such omissions.

This thesis examines decentralized voices in Burney’s fiction, which articulate alternative moral values to those endorsed by the main narrators and central protagonists. Examination establishes that Burney drew on various literary and extraliterary genres, actively selecting and shaping the language and speech patterns of her characters to create rapid inferential access to their subjective space. In doing so she interacted with disparate debates carried out over various discursive fields, tapping into her readers’ assumptions and knowledge of the real world, and inviting them to recover meanings from her represented speech. My study begins with two main sources of recuperation. One concerns contemporary debates about morality, carried out mainly in philosophical treatises, but disseminated in numerous texts, defining how to live a good life, and measuring potential effects of environment against innate qualities. Another source concerns language itself, which was a locus of contention during the eighteenth century, under pressure from various sources during the years when Burney published her novels: from those seeking to establish standard grammatical forms; from the challenges of shifting views on politeness and sensibility; from anxieties about class, gender, and nation; and from evolving concerns about affectation and deceit, as well as about any language which carried ‘palpable designs’. Engaging closely with the novels themselves, this thesis explores Burney’s use of dialogue as a platform, to engage with these kind of social, gender, and politeness issues. Further, this study reveals Burney’s ability to use conservative ideas about language in order to disrupt reader expectations, and to raise questions about the ownership of language styles and even whole genres, while proclaiming her own professionalism, and right of involvement in a literary and ethical life.

Text
Davidson June complete draft.pdf - Other
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (21MB)

More information

Published date: February 2012
Organisations: University of Southampton, English

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 367362
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/367362
PURE UUID: 3cd5b07e-8f8a-46cc-a5fc-a13416e05c76

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Oct 2014 12:00
Last modified: 25 Jan 2019 05:01

Export record

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×