The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A further examination of the lexical processing stages hypothesized by the E-Z Reader model

A further examination of the lexical processing stages hypothesized by the E-Z Reader model
A further examination of the lexical processing stages hypothesized by the E-Z Reader model
Participants’ eye movements were monitored while they read sentences in which high- and low-frequency target words were presented normally (i.e., the normal condition) or with either reduced stimulus quality (i.e., the faint condition) or alternating lower- and uppercase letters (i.e., the case-alternated condition). Both the stimulus quality and case alternation manipulations interacted with word frequency for the gaze duration measure, such that the magnitude of word frequency effects was increased relative to the normal condition. However, stimulus quality (but not case alternation) interacted with word frequency for the early fixation time measures (i.e., first fixation, single fixation), whereas case alternation (but not stimulus quality) interacted with word frequency for the later fixation time measures (i.e., total time, go-past time). We interpret this pattern of results as evidence that stimulus quality influences an earlier stage of lexical processing than does case alternation, and we discuss the implications of our results for models of eye movement control during reading.
1943-3921
407-414
Sheridan, H.
b7045807-e7ae-432d-90d2-adf74be928ce
Reingold, E.M.
c008c032-b4c5-4a13-bd43-dc7c9a87c598
Sheridan, H.
b7045807-e7ae-432d-90d2-adf74be928ce
Reingold, E.M.
c008c032-b4c5-4a13-bd43-dc7c9a87c598

Sheridan, H. and Reingold, E.M. (2013) A further examination of the lexical processing stages hypothesized by the E-Z Reader model. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75 (3), 407-414. (doi:10.3758/s13414-013-0442-0).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Participants’ eye movements were monitored while they read sentences in which high- and low-frequency target words were presented normally (i.e., the normal condition) or with either reduced stimulus quality (i.e., the faint condition) or alternating lower- and uppercase letters (i.e., the case-alternated condition). Both the stimulus quality and case alternation manipulations interacted with word frequency for the gaze duration measure, such that the magnitude of word frequency effects was increased relative to the normal condition. However, stimulus quality (but not case alternation) interacted with word frequency for the early fixation time measures (i.e., first fixation, single fixation), whereas case alternation (but not stimulus quality) interacted with word frequency for the later fixation time measures (i.e., total time, go-past time). We interpret this pattern of results as evidence that stimulus quality influences an earlier stage of lexical processing than does case alternation, and we discuss the implications of our results for models of eye movement control during reading.

Text
Sheridan & Reingold (2013) AP&P.pdf - Other
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Published date: 1 March 2013

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 367563
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/367563
ISSN: 1943-3921
PURE UUID: 08867c16-37a6-4762-b6fb-f2e854985af5

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Aug 2014 12:02
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 17:33

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: H. Sheridan
Author: E.M. Reingold

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×