The science classroom as a site of epistemic talk: a case study of a teacher's attempts to teach science based on argument
The science classroom as a site of epistemic talk: a case study of a teacher's attempts to teach science based on argument
Current science education research and policy highlight the need to conceptualize scientific disciplines not only based on a view of “science-as-knowledge” but also on a perspective of “science-as-practice,” placing an emphasis on practices such as explanation, argumentation, modeling, and communication. However, classroom discourse is not structured in a way that would normally provide to students the opportunity to engage in such “dialogic knowledge-building processes” (Duschl, 2008a) or epistemic discourse. This study argues that such a change in classroom discourse can be achieved through a focus on argumentation as an instructional approach, which aims to engage students in the epistemic practices of science. This study focuses on a qualitative case study of an experienced teacher's attempts to use argumentation over a school year as a way to identify elements of epistemic discourse that science teachers could be making part of their everyday science teaching. The analysis of classroom talk focused on (a) the teacher's discursive actions or epistemic operations, and (b) the ways in which these discursive actions presented or engaged students in the construction, justification, and evaluation of knowledge claims. The analysis revealed that the use of justificatory talk was consistent across the six lessons observed but the same consistency was not identified in attempts to engage students in evaluative practices. This discrepancy would suggest that evaluative practices were not as embedded in the teacher's classroom talk as the justification or construction of knowledge claims. Implications discussed include the need to reconsider pre-service and in-service teacher training and professional development so that science teachers do not only develop their skills of teaching science based on argument, but also of talking science based on argument.
epistemic practices, argumentation, classroom talk, secondary science, case study
1275-1300
Christodoulou, Andri
0a97820c-7e87-45d6-827a-d72fa1734d0a
Osborne, Jonathan
15b1de29-6239-42c4-b0dc-426450721b9a
7 November 2014
Christodoulou, Andri
0a97820c-7e87-45d6-827a-d72fa1734d0a
Osborne, Jonathan
15b1de29-6239-42c4-b0dc-426450721b9a
Christodoulou, Andri and Osborne, Jonathan
(2014)
The science classroom as a site of epistemic talk: a case study of a teacher's attempts to teach science based on argument.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51 (10), .
(doi:10.1002/tea.21166).
Abstract
Current science education research and policy highlight the need to conceptualize scientific disciplines not only based on a view of “science-as-knowledge” but also on a perspective of “science-as-practice,” placing an emphasis on practices such as explanation, argumentation, modeling, and communication. However, classroom discourse is not structured in a way that would normally provide to students the opportunity to engage in such “dialogic knowledge-building processes” (Duschl, 2008a) or epistemic discourse. This study argues that such a change in classroom discourse can be achieved through a focus on argumentation as an instructional approach, which aims to engage students in the epistemic practices of science. This study focuses on a qualitative case study of an experienced teacher's attempts to use argumentation over a school year as a way to identify elements of epistemic discourse that science teachers could be making part of their everyday science teaching. The analysis of classroom talk focused on (a) the teacher's discursive actions or epistemic operations, and (b) the ways in which these discursive actions presented or engaged students in the construction, justification, and evaluation of knowledge claims. The analysis revealed that the use of justificatory talk was consistent across the six lessons observed but the same consistency was not identified in attempts to engage students in evaluative practices. This discrepancy would suggest that evaluative practices were not as embedded in the teacher's classroom talk as the justification or construction of knowledge claims. Implications discussed include the need to reconsider pre-service and in-service teacher training and professional development so that science teachers do not only develop their skills of teaching science based on argument, but also of talking science based on argument.
Text
epistemic practices_author's copy.pdf
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 9 July 2014
e-pub ahead of print date: 13 August 2014
Published date: 7 November 2014
Keywords:
epistemic practices, argumentation, classroom talk, secondary science, case study
Organisations:
Mathematics, Science & Health Education
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 367766
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/367766
ISSN: 0022-4308
PURE UUID: c8f0bfb2-ee62-4095-976b-f3c0937c8165
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 29 Aug 2014 13:49
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:40
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Jonathan Osborne
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics