The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

‘Putting Life in Years’ (PLINY) telephone friendship groups research study: pilot randomised controlled trial

‘Putting Life in Years’ (PLINY) telephone friendship groups research study: pilot randomised controlled trial
‘Putting Life in Years’ (PLINY) telephone friendship groups research study: pilot randomised controlled trial
Background

Loneliness in older people is associated with poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We undertook a parallel-group randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone befriending for the maintenance of HRQoL in older people. An internal pilot tested the feasibility of the trial and intervention.

Methods

Participants aged >74 years, with good cognitive function, living independently in one UK city were recruited through general practices and other sources, then randomised to: (1) 6 weeks of short one-to-one telephone calls, followed by 12 weeks of group telephone calls with up to six participants, led by a trained volunteer facilitator; or (2) a control group. The main trial required the recruitment of 248 participants in a 1-year accrual window, of whom 124 were to receive telephone befriending. The pilot specified three success criteria which had to be met in order to progress the main trial to completion: recruitment of 68 participants in 95 days; retention of 80% participants at 6 months; successful delivery of telephone befriending by local franchise of national charity. The primary clinical outcome was the Short Form (36) Health Instrument (SF-36) Mental Health (MH) dimension score collected by telephone 6 months following randomisation.

Results

We informed 9,579 older people about the study. Seventy consenting participants were randomised to the pilot in 95 days, with 56 (80%) providing valid primary outcome data (26 intervention, 30 control). Twenty-four participants randomly allocated to the research arm actually received telephone befriending due to poor recruitment and retention of volunteer facilitators. The trial was closed early as a result. The mean 6-month SF-36 MH scores were 78 (SD 18) and 71 (SD 21) for the intervention and control groups, respectively (mean difference, 7; 95% CI, -3 to 16).

Conclusions

Recruitment and retention of participants to a definitive trial with a recruitment window of 1 year is feasible. For the voluntary sector to recruit sufficient volunteers to match demand for telephone befriending created by trial recruitment would require the study to be run in more than one major population centre, and/or involve dedicated management of volunteers.

Trial registration

ISRCTN28645428.
1745-6215
1-12
Mountain, Gail A.
6d23ed3f-e651-40c6-883e-1c8cee29c102
Hind, Daniel
d0246cbf-e8b6-45c2-9412-76e0988852f3
Gossage-Worrall, Rebecca
c299b140-6c96-413e-91fa-1ceed377c493
Walters, Stephen J.
aed7a87c-2c83-4a28-a68f-54bfecb3fa53
Duncan, Rosie
77701f51-4670-4f01-a118-5b9bb7cc2aa4
Newbould, Louise
4936e752-1f08-47ba-b5f5-21da68b199a2
Rex, Saleema
c3fbbb46-7e52-496f-9b9c-5a67a2c1bbce
Jones, Carys
3e69209c-acb9-426a-9ee0-515b81ee1845
Bowling, Ann
796ca209-687f-4079-8a40-572076251936
Cattan, Mima
68225879-d6e3-42a6-8ad6-24e796ba3066
Cairns, Angela
aca12ebc-8345-426e-9073-faa5a6861493
Cooper, Cindy
92a6af10-54fc-4742-80a7-c065af333a75
Edwards, Rhiannon
aa8f9ccd-09e7-4374-8ee4-70152005e510
Goyder, Elizabeth C.
5e5edd2e-518a-43f3-87ea-44fe1694fc46
Mountain, Gail A.
6d23ed3f-e651-40c6-883e-1c8cee29c102
Hind, Daniel
d0246cbf-e8b6-45c2-9412-76e0988852f3
Gossage-Worrall, Rebecca
c299b140-6c96-413e-91fa-1ceed377c493
Walters, Stephen J.
aed7a87c-2c83-4a28-a68f-54bfecb3fa53
Duncan, Rosie
77701f51-4670-4f01-a118-5b9bb7cc2aa4
Newbould, Louise
4936e752-1f08-47ba-b5f5-21da68b199a2
Rex, Saleema
c3fbbb46-7e52-496f-9b9c-5a67a2c1bbce
Jones, Carys
3e69209c-acb9-426a-9ee0-515b81ee1845
Bowling, Ann
796ca209-687f-4079-8a40-572076251936
Cattan, Mima
68225879-d6e3-42a6-8ad6-24e796ba3066
Cairns, Angela
aca12ebc-8345-426e-9073-faa5a6861493
Cooper, Cindy
92a6af10-54fc-4742-80a7-c065af333a75
Edwards, Rhiannon
aa8f9ccd-09e7-4374-8ee4-70152005e510
Goyder, Elizabeth C.
5e5edd2e-518a-43f3-87ea-44fe1694fc46

Mountain, Gail A., Hind, Daniel, Gossage-Worrall, Rebecca, Walters, Stephen J., Duncan, Rosie, Newbould, Louise, Rex, Saleema, Jones, Carys, Bowling, Ann, Cattan, Mima, Cairns, Angela, Cooper, Cindy, Edwards, Rhiannon and Goyder, Elizabeth C. (2014) ‘Putting Life in Years’ (PLINY) telephone friendship groups research study: pilot randomised controlled trial. Trials, 15 (141), 1-12. (doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-141). (PMID:24758530)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background

Loneliness in older people is associated with poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We undertook a parallel-group randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone befriending for the maintenance of HRQoL in older people. An internal pilot tested the feasibility of the trial and intervention.

Methods

Participants aged >74 years, with good cognitive function, living independently in one UK city were recruited through general practices and other sources, then randomised to: (1) 6 weeks of short one-to-one telephone calls, followed by 12 weeks of group telephone calls with up to six participants, led by a trained volunteer facilitator; or (2) a control group. The main trial required the recruitment of 248 participants in a 1-year accrual window, of whom 124 were to receive telephone befriending. The pilot specified three success criteria which had to be met in order to progress the main trial to completion: recruitment of 68 participants in 95 days; retention of 80% participants at 6 months; successful delivery of telephone befriending by local franchise of national charity. The primary clinical outcome was the Short Form (36) Health Instrument (SF-36) Mental Health (MH) dimension score collected by telephone 6 months following randomisation.

Results

We informed 9,579 older people about the study. Seventy consenting participants were randomised to the pilot in 95 days, with 56 (80%) providing valid primary outcome data (26 intervention, 30 control). Twenty-four participants randomly allocated to the research arm actually received telephone befriending due to poor recruitment and retention of volunteer facilitators. The trial was closed early as a result. The mean 6-month SF-36 MH scores were 78 (SD 18) and 71 (SD 21) for the intervention and control groups, respectively (mean difference, 7; 95% CI, -3 to 16).

Conclusions

Recruitment and retention of participants to a definitive trial with a recruitment window of 1 year is feasible. For the voluntary sector to recruit sufficient volunteers to match demand for telephone befriending created by trial recruitment would require the study to be run in more than one major population centre, and/or involve dedicated management of volunteers.

Trial registration

ISRCTN28645428.

Text
Mountain et al Bowling TRIALS.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License Other.
Download (510kB)

More information

Published date: 24 April 2014
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 368132
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/368132
ISSN: 1745-6215
PURE UUID: 957d0359-5e71-4987-ab7b-eb536bc2d59e

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Aug 2014 13:43
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 17:42

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Gail A. Mountain
Author: Daniel Hind
Author: Rebecca Gossage-Worrall
Author: Stephen J. Walters
Author: Rosie Duncan
Author: Louise Newbould
Author: Saleema Rex
Author: Carys Jones
Author: Ann Bowling
Author: Mima Cattan
Author: Angela Cairns
Author: Cindy Cooper
Author: Rhiannon Edwards
Author: Elizabeth C. Goyder

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×