Competitive advantage and entrepreneurial power: the dark side of entrepreneurship
Competitive advantage and entrepreneurial power: the dark side of entrepreneurship
Purpose: To show that the inability to adapt to a series of crises caused by business development is one of the principal causes of failure for all organisations and that one of the primary components in small business success must be the managerial competence of the principal actors, inevitably the owner-manager.
Design/methodology/approach: This paper examines the divergence between the prescribed and assumed models of entrepreneurial behaviour provided by contemporary management theorists and the real, observed and reported behaviour of small business practitioners and owner-managers. It reports on case study examples and highlights the dichotomy between expected and actual behaviour in typical management situations.
Findings: The paper suggests that the almost egotistical attitude displayed by many entrepreneurs, constitutes an abuse of the trust and the power placed in the hands of small business owner-managers and that in extreme instances, the abuse of entrepreneurial power may lead directly to the failure of the small firm.
Originality/value: Many surveys of small business failure and sub-optimal performance often suggest situational and operational causes and explanations. This paper offers a different perspective for future research because the cause may be seen to lie with the apparently non-rational behaviour of the entrepreneur or owner-manager who does not adhere to the “rules” and expectations of classical management theory.
competitive advantage, entrepreneurs, management power
9-23
Jennings, Peter
787a0181-2711-488f-8382-4f302d09a314
Beaver, Graham
08ad6794-151a-48d0-acf4-f715fdf46987
2005
Jennings, Peter
787a0181-2711-488f-8382-4f302d09a314
Beaver, Graham
08ad6794-151a-48d0-acf4-f715fdf46987
Jennings, Peter and Beaver, Graham
(2005)
Competitive advantage and entrepreneurial power: the dark side of entrepreneurship.
Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12 (1), .
(doi:10.1108/14626000510579617).
Abstract
Purpose: To show that the inability to adapt to a series of crises caused by business development is one of the principal causes of failure for all organisations and that one of the primary components in small business success must be the managerial competence of the principal actors, inevitably the owner-manager.
Design/methodology/approach: This paper examines the divergence between the prescribed and assumed models of entrepreneurial behaviour provided by contemporary management theorists and the real, observed and reported behaviour of small business practitioners and owner-managers. It reports on case study examples and highlights the dichotomy between expected and actual behaviour in typical management situations.
Findings: The paper suggests that the almost egotistical attitude displayed by many entrepreneurs, constitutes an abuse of the trust and the power placed in the hands of small business owner-managers and that in extreme instances, the abuse of entrepreneurial power may lead directly to the failure of the small firm.
Originality/value: Many surveys of small business failure and sub-optimal performance often suggest situational and operational causes and explanations. This paper offers a different perspective for future research because the cause may be seen to lie with the apparently non-rational behaviour of the entrepreneur or owner-manager who does not adhere to the “rules” and expectations of classical management theory.
Text
36818.pdf
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
More information
Published date: 2005
Keywords:
competitive advantage, entrepreneurs, management power
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 36818
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/36818
ISSN: 1462-6004
PURE UUID: 2c3117d8-14f2-4bfb-a3a5-636a9ff1e52f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 22 May 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:57
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Peter Jennings
Author:
Graham Beaver
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics