The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Developing a value function for nature development and land use policy in Flanders, Belgium

Developing a value function for nature development and land use policy in Flanders, Belgium
Developing a value function for nature development and land use policy in Flanders, Belgium
In densely populated regions such as Belgium where land is a scarce resource, nature areas are under increasing pressure of urban and infrastructural development. Decisions regarding land use changes usually do not fully account for the associated environmental impacts and the related social welfare changes.

This paper aims to provide a generic monetary value function to assess the public benefits of amenity, recreation and biodiversity values associated with land use changes from agricultural land to different types of nature. This function can be used in cost–benefit analyses to inform decisions on land use changes, including the creation, restoration and compensation of nature areas. The ecosystem services values can be compared to the financial costs of such projects and accounted for in policy-making and planning decisions aimed at maximising social welfare. Important criteria for the development of this value function are that: (1) it should be transferable across sites and able to account for relevant characteristics of both the nature areas and the population of beneficiaries, and (2) it should control for spatial variables, such as size of the area and distance to the respondent's home.

The value function of our case study is based on a large scale choice experiment, as part of a survey to capture public preferences, focusing on land use changes among a sample of 3000 households in the Flemish region in Belgium. In the choice experiment, respondents were asked to choose between different hypothetical nature development scenarios, described in terms of their ecological quality (nature type, species richness) and a set of spatial characteristics, including, size, accessibility, adjacent land use and distance to the respondents’ residence. The model estimates are used to monetise public preferences for land use changes. The results show that the public attributes significantly different values to the different nature types, with highest values for forests. A distance decay effect was clearly observed, meaning that willingness to pay reduces when nature areas are situated further away from the place of residence. The size of the area was also significant but much less significant than would be expected. The application of the value function is demonstrated in two examples.

0264-8377
549-559
Liekens, Inge
71ad389d-8f8f-4849-bef8-2c9183665dd4
Schaafsma, Marije
937ac629-0fa2-4a11-bdf7-c3688405467d
De Nocker, Leo
7eee5db0-eddf-4fa4-83ff-0b04fd82306e
Broekx, Steven
4689651f-6f29-4ff1-bd83-c1c2450faf8b
Staes, Jan
af99cabf-b784-4268-82ec-8dd30e4de09e
Aertsens, Joris
58624dd0-b235-4e35-9aa4-e917f77e03a0
Brouwer, Roy
e05861b5-5961-45cd-9de0-883067908c5e
Liekens, Inge
71ad389d-8f8f-4849-bef8-2c9183665dd4
Schaafsma, Marije
937ac629-0fa2-4a11-bdf7-c3688405467d
De Nocker, Leo
7eee5db0-eddf-4fa4-83ff-0b04fd82306e
Broekx, Steven
4689651f-6f29-4ff1-bd83-c1c2450faf8b
Staes, Jan
af99cabf-b784-4268-82ec-8dd30e4de09e
Aertsens, Joris
58624dd0-b235-4e35-9aa4-e917f77e03a0
Brouwer, Roy
e05861b5-5961-45cd-9de0-883067908c5e

Liekens, Inge, Schaafsma, Marije, De Nocker, Leo, Broekx, Steven, Staes, Jan, Aertsens, Joris and Brouwer, Roy (2013) Developing a value function for nature development and land use policy in Flanders, Belgium. Land Use Policy, 30 (1), 549-559. (doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.04.008).

Record type: Article

Abstract

In densely populated regions such as Belgium where land is a scarce resource, nature areas are under increasing pressure of urban and infrastructural development. Decisions regarding land use changes usually do not fully account for the associated environmental impacts and the related social welfare changes.

This paper aims to provide a generic monetary value function to assess the public benefits of amenity, recreation and biodiversity values associated with land use changes from agricultural land to different types of nature. This function can be used in cost–benefit analyses to inform decisions on land use changes, including the creation, restoration and compensation of nature areas. The ecosystem services values can be compared to the financial costs of such projects and accounted for in policy-making and planning decisions aimed at maximising social welfare. Important criteria for the development of this value function are that: (1) it should be transferable across sites and able to account for relevant characteristics of both the nature areas and the population of beneficiaries, and (2) it should control for spatial variables, such as size of the area and distance to the respondent's home.

The value function of our case study is based on a large scale choice experiment, as part of a survey to capture public preferences, focusing on land use changes among a sample of 3000 households in the Flemish region in Belgium. In the choice experiment, respondents were asked to choose between different hypothetical nature development scenarios, described in terms of their ecological quality (nature type, species richness) and a set of spatial characteristics, including, size, accessibility, adjacent land use and distance to the respondents’ residence. The model estimates are used to monetise public preferences for land use changes. The results show that the public attributes significantly different values to the different nature types, with highest values for forests. A distance decay effect was clearly observed, meaning that willingness to pay reduces when nature areas are situated further away from the place of residence. The size of the area was also significant but much less significant than would be expected. The application of the value function is demonstrated in two examples.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: January 2013
Organisations: Faculty of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Geography & Environment

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 368360
URI: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/368360
ISSN: 0264-8377
PURE UUID: e6f28430-8c45-445f-8a94-054d5bf894f8
ORCID for Marije Schaafsma: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0878-069X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Sep 2014 11:25
Last modified: 14 Jun 2019 00:30

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Inge Liekens
Author: Leo De Nocker
Author: Steven Broekx
Author: Jan Staes
Author: Joris Aertsens
Author: Roy Brouwer

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×