The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Annual report disclosures in UK universities: the influence of governing boards

Annual report disclosures in UK universities: the influence of governing boards
Annual report disclosures in UK universities: the influence of governing boards
The international higher educational institutions (HEIs) environment has experienced rapid changes and/or reforms over the past decades. Specifically, the HE sector has been characterised by increasing student numbers, declining government funding, but tighter external regulation, increasing competition, and greater accountability through increased ‘managerialism’, ‘commoditisation’, ‘commercialisation’ and ‘corporatisation’ of academics and HEIs. These changes have brought to the core the issue of sound financial management through good internal governance, increased public accountability and transparency, and stronger performance within HEIs. This paper, therefore, investigates why and how HEIs internal governance structures might influence their voluntary public accountability and transparency disclosures (PADs). Using a 2012 cross-sectional sample of 130 UK HEIs, we find that audit committee quality, governing board diversity, independent or lay governors, and the presence of a corporate governance committee impact positively in PADs. By contrast, we do not find any evidence that audit firm size, governing board size, and the frequency of governing board meetings have any significant effect on PADs. The central tenor of our findings remains unchanged across a number of econometric models that sufficiently account for different kinds of endogeneities, as well as alternative internal governance mechanisms and PADs measures. Our results are generally in line with the predictions of our multi-theoretical framework that incorporates insights from agency, institutional, legitimacy, public accountability/stewardship, resources dependence, and stakeholder theories
Soobaroyen, Teerooven
6686e2f8-564f-4f7f-b079-9dc8a2f53a48
Broad, M.J
81955ffa-a9d3-42cd-99c8-52e06cd67424
Ntim, Collins G.
1f344edc-8005-4e96-8972-d56c4dade46b
Soobaroyen, Teerooven
6686e2f8-564f-4f7f-b079-9dc8a2f53a48
Broad, M.J
81955ffa-a9d3-42cd-99c8-52e06cd67424
Ntim, Collins G.
1f344edc-8005-4e96-8972-d56c4dade46b

Soobaroyen, Teerooven, Broad, M.J and Ntim, Collins G. (2014) Annual report disclosures in UK universities: the influence of governing boards. 2014 EFMD Higher Education Research Conference, Stockholm University.

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

The international higher educational institutions (HEIs) environment has experienced rapid changes and/or reforms over the past decades. Specifically, the HE sector has been characterised by increasing student numbers, declining government funding, but tighter external regulation, increasing competition, and greater accountability through increased ‘managerialism’, ‘commoditisation’, ‘commercialisation’ and ‘corporatisation’ of academics and HEIs. These changes have brought to the core the issue of sound financial management through good internal governance, increased public accountability and transparency, and stronger performance within HEIs. This paper, therefore, investigates why and how HEIs internal governance structures might influence their voluntary public accountability and transparency disclosures (PADs). Using a 2012 cross-sectional sample of 130 UK HEIs, we find that audit committee quality, governing board diversity, independent or lay governors, and the presence of a corporate governance committee impact positively in PADs. By contrast, we do not find any evidence that audit firm size, governing board size, and the frequency of governing board meetings have any significant effect on PADs. The central tenor of our findings remains unchanged across a number of econometric models that sufficiently account for different kinds of endogeneities, as well as alternative internal governance mechanisms and PADs measures. Our results are generally in line with the predictions of our multi-theoretical framework that incorporates insights from agency, institutional, legitimacy, public accountability/stewardship, resources dependence, and stakeholder theories

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 15 May 2014
Venue - Dates: 2014 EFMD Higher Education Research Conference, Stockholm University, 2014-05-14
Organisations: Accounting, Southampton Business School

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 368826
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/368826
PURE UUID: e4f15a4b-715c-44ed-98e3-5a49a4c729bb
ORCID for Teerooven Soobaroyen: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3340-1666
ORCID for Collins G. Ntim: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1042-4056

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Sep 2014 11:28
Last modified: 12 Dec 2021 03:46

Export record

Contributors

Author: Teerooven Soobaroyen ORCID iD
Author: M.J Broad
Author: Collins G. Ntim ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×