Structuring a delay and disruption Claim: an application of cause-mapping and system dynamics
Structuring a delay and disruption Claim: an application of cause-mapping and system dynamics
The idea of ‘‘Delay and Disruption’’ within projects is well-known and is often the subject of litigation claims. However, the term is ill-defined, and it is difficult to justify such claims within a legal process. This paper demonstrates a well-developed approach, which is a logical, transparent, auditable and sustainable means of presenting such a claim. It describes the format for a claim document that presents first the disruptive triggers, then using a formal qualitative
model builds the case from the interacting effects of these triggers. Transformation of this model into a computer simulation and the ability to explore different scenarios provides the quantitative part of the claim document. Thus three elements are presented in the document: demonstration of causality, of responsibility and of a quantum for the
claim. This process also provides additional benefits, including a high level of participant ‘‘buy-in’’, and the basis of a model that can be used to support the claim.
project management and scheduling, delay and disruption, litigation, cause mapping (structuring and analysis)
192-204
Williams, Terry
085e6e3e-f94e-435c-936e-82fb0c5c4ae8
Ackermann, Fran
de3bfd09-472a-44ee-9adb-d32b0c0b3291
Eden, Colin
db5ed969-1735-4ad2-8694-fafb5c06686b
2003
Williams, Terry
085e6e3e-f94e-435c-936e-82fb0c5c4ae8
Ackermann, Fran
de3bfd09-472a-44ee-9adb-d32b0c0b3291
Eden, Colin
db5ed969-1735-4ad2-8694-fafb5c06686b
Williams, Terry, Ackermann, Fran and Eden, Colin
(2003)
Structuring a delay and disruption Claim: an application of cause-mapping and system dynamics.
European Journal of Operational Research, 148 (1), .
(doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00372-7).
Abstract
The idea of ‘‘Delay and Disruption’’ within projects is well-known and is often the subject of litigation claims. However, the term is ill-defined, and it is difficult to justify such claims within a legal process. This paper demonstrates a well-developed approach, which is a logical, transparent, auditable and sustainable means of presenting such a claim. It describes the format for a claim document that presents first the disruptive triggers, then using a formal qualitative
model builds the case from the interacting effects of these triggers. Transformation of this model into a computer simulation and the ability to explore different scenarios provides the quantitative part of the claim document. Thus three elements are presented in the document: demonstration of causality, of responsibility and of a quantum for the
claim. This process also provides additional benefits, including a high level of participant ‘‘buy-in’’, and the basis of a model that can be used to support the claim.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2003
Additional Information:
Production, Manufacturing and Logistics
Keywords:
project management and scheduling, delay and disruption, litigation, cause mapping (structuring and analysis)
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 36897
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/36897
ISSN: 0377-2217
PURE UUID: 11885c71-9c41-4916-9547-3a04c957c469
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 23 May 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:57
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Terry Williams
Author:
Fran Ackermann
Author:
Colin Eden
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics