The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current and future treatment options

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current and future treatment options
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current and future treatment options
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic condition of unknown etiology with an unfavorable outcome from progressively deteriorating respiratory function, leading ultimately to death from respiratory failure. It is characterized by sequential acute lung injury resulting in progressive fixed tissue fibrosis, architectural distortion and loss of function. An excess of profibrotic cytokines and/or a deficiency in antifibrotic cytokines have been implicated in the pathological process as has excessive oxidation. IPF is distinguished from other forms of diffuse pulmonary fibrosis by the presence of the specific histological pattern of usual interstitial pneumonitis. Oral corticosteroids are the usual treatment, but objective response rates are poor and good quality studies do not exist. Other therapies either alone or in combination with corticosteroids are widely used, including azathioprine, colchicine, cyclophosphamide and penicillamine. There is a paucity of good quality information regarding the effectiveness of most noncorticosteroid immunosuppressive agents. Older studies of lesser methodological quality have shown benefits from these drugs, generally when added to corticosteroids. Many were retrospective reviews or uncontrolled, nonrandomized, open-label, prospective studies and often included other histological patterns of disease which are now thought to respond better to immunosuppressive agents. The results of intervention with colchicine and azathioprine have been disappointing when assessed by good quality trials using modern diagnostic criteria. Modern high quality studies are lacking for several agents, notably cyclophosphamide and penicillamine. The older agents may yet prove to be effective but further good quality trials will be necessary to assess these agents adequately. Other new anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antifibrotic or anticytokine compounds are largely untried or unreported. One trial using interferon-gamma-1b showed a significant improvement in pulmonary function but there are concerns regarding the generalizability of this study. Pirfenidone, cyclosporine and acetylcysteine may also prove to be of benefit but current studies are of insufficient quality to allow for any conclusions to be drawn. Currently there is no good evidence to support the routine use of oral corticosteroids, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, penicillamine, colchicine, cyclosporine or any other immunosuppressive, antifibrotic or immunomodulatory agent in the management of IPF. Interferon, pirfenidone and other new agents may be of benefit but further studies are required. Any recommendations for treatment must therefore be made on an individual and empiric basis. As some other forms of pulmonary fibrosis may respond better to immunosuppressive agents, it remains important to make an accurate diagnosis, by open lung biopsy if necessary
1175-6365
211-24
Davies, Huw R.
c1563a44-b827-4466-be35-2e17de4252e5
Richeldi, Luca
47177d9c-731a-49a1-9cc6-4ac8f6bbbf26
Davies, Huw R.
c1563a44-b827-4466-be35-2e17de4252e5
Richeldi, Luca
47177d9c-731a-49a1-9cc6-4ac8f6bbbf26

Davies, Huw R. and Richeldi, Luca (2002) Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: current and future treatment options. American Journal of Respiratory Medicine, 1 (3), 211-24. (PMID:14720059)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic condition of unknown etiology with an unfavorable outcome from progressively deteriorating respiratory function, leading ultimately to death from respiratory failure. It is characterized by sequential acute lung injury resulting in progressive fixed tissue fibrosis, architectural distortion and loss of function. An excess of profibrotic cytokines and/or a deficiency in antifibrotic cytokines have been implicated in the pathological process as has excessive oxidation. IPF is distinguished from other forms of diffuse pulmonary fibrosis by the presence of the specific histological pattern of usual interstitial pneumonitis. Oral corticosteroids are the usual treatment, but objective response rates are poor and good quality studies do not exist. Other therapies either alone or in combination with corticosteroids are widely used, including azathioprine, colchicine, cyclophosphamide and penicillamine. There is a paucity of good quality information regarding the effectiveness of most noncorticosteroid immunosuppressive agents. Older studies of lesser methodological quality have shown benefits from these drugs, generally when added to corticosteroids. Many were retrospective reviews or uncontrolled, nonrandomized, open-label, prospective studies and often included other histological patterns of disease which are now thought to respond better to immunosuppressive agents. The results of intervention with colchicine and azathioprine have been disappointing when assessed by good quality trials using modern diagnostic criteria. Modern high quality studies are lacking for several agents, notably cyclophosphamide and penicillamine. The older agents may yet prove to be effective but further good quality trials will be necessary to assess these agents adequately. Other new anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antifibrotic or anticytokine compounds are largely untried or unreported. One trial using interferon-gamma-1b showed a significant improvement in pulmonary function but there are concerns regarding the generalizability of this study. Pirfenidone, cyclosporine and acetylcysteine may also prove to be of benefit but current studies are of insufficient quality to allow for any conclusions to be drawn. Currently there is no good evidence to support the routine use of oral corticosteroids, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, penicillamine, colchicine, cyclosporine or any other immunosuppressive, antifibrotic or immunomodulatory agent in the management of IPF. Interferon, pirfenidone and other new agents may be of benefit but further studies are required. Any recommendations for treatment must therefore be made on an individual and empiric basis. As some other forms of pulmonary fibrosis may respond better to immunosuppressive agents, it remains important to make an accurate diagnosis, by open lung biopsy if necessary

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: 2002
Organisations: Clinical & Experimental Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 369060
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/369060
ISSN: 1175-6365
PURE UUID: a185431c-3c90-4e10-8853-64aeaeb5fb55

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Oct 2014 11:10
Last modified: 25 Sep 2018 16:31

Export record

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×