The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Attentional bias for pain- and period-related symptom words in healthy women who experienced a recent painful period

Attentional bias for pain- and period-related symptom words in healthy women who experienced a recent painful period
Attentional bias for pain- and period-related symptom words in healthy women who experienced a recent painful period
Background: Attentional biases for pain-related information have been commonly reported in patients with chronic pain. Biases may also exist in individuals who recently experienced an episode of acute clinical pain, although limited investigation has been conducted. The present study is the first to explore attentional biases in women who experienced recent menstrual pain.

Methods: Seventy healthy women were recruited who experienced a regular menstrual cycle and a recent painful period. All participants completed a visual-probe task with pain-related and period-related symptom words, which were presented at subliminal (14 ms, followed by nonsensical consonant letter string for 286 ms) and supraliminal (300 ms, 1250 ms) exposure durations. Participants then completed a series of self-report measures, including a measure of cyclical perimenstrual symptoms.

Results: Recent menstrual pain severity was found to be significantly predictive of attentional bias towards pain-related words presented for 1250 ms. However, no significant evidence of bias was found towards period-related symptom words.

Conclusions: Pain-related attentional biases are associated with recent menstrual pain severity. The experience and severity of pain, rather than its duration (i.e., whether pain is chronic or acute), may be the primary determinants of pain-related attentional bias. Future research could explore attentional biases in acute clinical pain samples to confirm this notion.
1090-3801
745-751
Schoth, D.E.
73f3036e-b8cb-40b2-9466-e8e0f341fdd5
Williams, S.
f98f47db-b1d6-42c2-b0eb-7c0cb9a981d0
Liossi, C.
fd401ad6-581a-4a31-a60b-f8671ffd3558
Schoth, D.E.
73f3036e-b8cb-40b2-9466-e8e0f341fdd5
Williams, S.
f98f47db-b1d6-42c2-b0eb-7c0cb9a981d0
Liossi, C.
fd401ad6-581a-4a31-a60b-f8671ffd3558

Schoth, D.E., Williams, S. and Liossi, C. (2015) Attentional bias for pain- and period-related symptom words in healthy women who experienced a recent painful period. European Journal of Pain, 19 (6), 745-751. (doi:10.1002/ejp.597).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Attentional biases for pain-related information have been commonly reported in patients with chronic pain. Biases may also exist in individuals who recently experienced an episode of acute clinical pain, although limited investigation has been conducted. The present study is the first to explore attentional biases in women who experienced recent menstrual pain.

Methods: Seventy healthy women were recruited who experienced a regular menstrual cycle and a recent painful period. All participants completed a visual-probe task with pain-related and period-related symptom words, which were presented at subliminal (14 ms, followed by nonsensical consonant letter string for 286 ms) and supraliminal (300 ms, 1250 ms) exposure durations. Participants then completed a series of self-report measures, including a measure of cyclical perimenstrual symptoms.

Results: Recent menstrual pain severity was found to be significantly predictive of attentional bias towards pain-related words presented for 1250 ms. However, no significant evidence of bias was found towards period-related symptom words.

Conclusions: Pain-related attentional biases are associated with recent menstrual pain severity. The experience and severity of pain, rather than its duration (i.e., whether pain is chronic or acute), may be the primary determinants of pain-related attentional bias. Future research could explore attentional biases in acute clinical pain samples to confirm this notion.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 25 September 2014
Published date: 3 May 2015
Organisations: Psychology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 369112
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/369112
ISSN: 1090-3801
PURE UUID: 3a78f8cb-0e5a-4f06-9738-64bf71423a25
ORCID for C. Liossi: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0627-6377

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Sep 2014 11:48
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:24

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: D.E. Schoth
Author: S. Williams
Author: C. Liossi ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×