The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Prevalence of use of performance enhancing drugs by fitness centre members

Prevalence of use of performance enhancing drugs by fitness centre members
Prevalence of use of performance enhancing drugs by fitness centre members
Studies on the use of performance enhancing drugs (PED) in fitness centres rely predominately on conventional survey methods using direct questioning. However, research indicates that direct questioning of sensitive information is characterized by under-reporting. The aim of the present study was to contrast direct questioning of different types of PED use by Dutch fitness centre members with results obtained with the Randomized Response Technique (RRT). Questionnaires were conducted among members of fitness centres. PED were classified into the following categories: anabolic steroids, prohormones, substances to counteract side-effects, growth hormone and/or insulin, stimulants (to reduce weight), and miscellaneous substances. A total of 718 athletes from 92 fitness centres completed the questionnaire. The conventional method resulted in prevalences varying between 0% and 0.4% for the different types of PED with an overall prevalence of 0.4%. RRT resulted in prevalences varying between 0.8% and 4.8% for the different types of PED with an overall prevalence of 8.2%. The overall prevalence of the two survey methods differed significantly. The current study showed that the conventional survey method using direct questioning led to an underestimation of the prevalence. Based on the RRT results, the percentage of users of PED among members of fitness centres is approximately 8.2%. Stimulants to lose weight had the highest prevalence, even higher than anabolic steroids. The key task for future preventive health work is to not only focus on anabolic steroid use, but also include interventions focusing on the use of stimulants to lose weight.
1942-7603
434-438
Stubbe, Janine H.
3c35bd60-7dd3-4c3e-beae-330ec3e8db11
Chorus, Astrid M.J.
9174bc50-c05f-41be-a821-ea879639f012
Frank, Laurence E.
595133fc-0970-4b42-afb6-3794a2ffb6ab
de Hon, Olivier
74fde99d-62fb-4c08-bd59-113e8efeed6d
van der Heijden, Peter G.M.
85157917-3b33-4683-81be-713f987fd612
Stubbe, Janine H.
3c35bd60-7dd3-4c3e-beae-330ec3e8db11
Chorus, Astrid M.J.
9174bc50-c05f-41be-a821-ea879639f012
Frank, Laurence E.
595133fc-0970-4b42-afb6-3794a2ffb6ab
de Hon, Olivier
74fde99d-62fb-4c08-bd59-113e8efeed6d
van der Heijden, Peter G.M.
85157917-3b33-4683-81be-713f987fd612

Stubbe, Janine H., Chorus, Astrid M.J., Frank, Laurence E., de Hon, Olivier and van der Heijden, Peter G.M. (2013) Prevalence of use of performance enhancing drugs by fitness centre members. Drug Testing and Analysis, 6 (5), 434-438. (doi:10.1002/dta.1525). (PMID:24019293)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Studies on the use of performance enhancing drugs (PED) in fitness centres rely predominately on conventional survey methods using direct questioning. However, research indicates that direct questioning of sensitive information is characterized by under-reporting. The aim of the present study was to contrast direct questioning of different types of PED use by Dutch fitness centre members with results obtained with the Randomized Response Technique (RRT). Questionnaires were conducted among members of fitness centres. PED were classified into the following categories: anabolic steroids, prohormones, substances to counteract side-effects, growth hormone and/or insulin, stimulants (to reduce weight), and miscellaneous substances. A total of 718 athletes from 92 fitness centres completed the questionnaire. The conventional method resulted in prevalences varying between 0% and 0.4% for the different types of PED with an overall prevalence of 0.4%. RRT resulted in prevalences varying between 0.8% and 4.8% for the different types of PED with an overall prevalence of 8.2%. The overall prevalence of the two survey methods differed significantly. The current study showed that the conventional survey method using direct questioning led to an underestimation of the prevalence. Based on the RRT results, the percentage of users of PED among members of fitness centres is approximately 8.2%. Stimulants to lose weight had the highest prevalence, even higher than anabolic steroids. The key task for future preventive health work is to not only focus on anabolic steroid use, but also include interventions focusing on the use of stimulants to lose weight.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 9 September 2013
Organisations: Social Statistics & Demography

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 369731
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/369731
ISSN: 1942-7603
PURE UUID: 98681fc8-05b4-4715-89ba-191667273c5b
ORCID for Peter G.M. van der Heijden: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3345-096X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Oct 2014 11:55
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:46

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Janine H. Stubbe
Author: Astrid M.J. Chorus
Author: Laurence E. Frank
Author: Olivier de Hon

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×