The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Clinical usefulness of the kiddie-disruptive behavior disorder schedule in the diagnosis of DBD and ADHD in preschool children

Clinical usefulness of the kiddie-disruptive behavior disorder schedule in the diagnosis of DBD and ADHD in preschool children
Clinical usefulness of the kiddie-disruptive behavior disorder schedule in the diagnosis of DBD and ADHD in preschool children
The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical usefulness of a semi-structured diagnostic parent interview, i.e., the Kiddie-Disruptive Behavior Disorder Schedule (K-DBDS), in preschool children. For Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD), to define symptoms two coding methods were compared, i.e., one based on the threshold "often" and the other based on the frequency of behaviors in combination with the presence of clinical concern. For Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), to define symptoms, two coding methods were compared, i.e., one with and one without consideration of pervasiveness across contexts. Participants were referred preschool children with externalizing behavioral problems (N?=?193; 83% male) and typically developing (TD) children (N?=?58; 71% male). The referred children were given a diagnosis of either ODD/CD (N?=?39), or ADHD (N?=?58) or comorbid ODD/CD+ADHD (N?=?57) or no diagnosis (N?=?39) based on best-estimate diagnosis. Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analyses showed that a cutoff score of four ODD symptoms using "often" as the threshold for frequency of behaviors led to a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 93%; the coding method which included the frequency of behaviors yielded a sensitivity of 56% and a specificity of 100%. For ADHD, a clinical cutoff score of five symptoms without the pervasiveness criterion yielded a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 98%; when the pervasiveness criterion was included sensitivity was 77% and specificity 98%. In the clinical assessment of ODD and ADHD in preschool children, the K-DBDS may be used with ODD symptom definition based on the threshold "often" and ADHD pervasiveness across contexts not included.
0091-0627
681-690
Bunte, Tessa L.
4d08264f-2225-49c4-b2dd-b9c90305f108
Schoemaker, Kim
79de0066-1f71-46dd-bb15-d81e2b3a3f0c
Hessen, David J.
5e4ddabd-0df6-48e4-8c6e-478e2f1940ec
van der Heijden, Peter G.M.
85157917-3b33-4683-81be-713f987fd612
Matthys, Walter
e6b1bb43-bc76-4335-bf31-5d7ccb584a00
Bunte, Tessa L.
4d08264f-2225-49c4-b2dd-b9c90305f108
Schoemaker, Kim
79de0066-1f71-46dd-bb15-d81e2b3a3f0c
Hessen, David J.
5e4ddabd-0df6-48e4-8c6e-478e2f1940ec
van der Heijden, Peter G.M.
85157917-3b33-4683-81be-713f987fd612
Matthys, Walter
e6b1bb43-bc76-4335-bf31-5d7ccb584a00

Bunte, Tessa L., Schoemaker, Kim, Hessen, David J., van der Heijden, Peter G.M. and Matthys, Walter (2013) Clinical usefulness of the kiddie-disruptive behavior disorder schedule in the diagnosis of DBD and ADHD in preschool children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41 (5), 681-690. (doi:10.1007/s10802-013-9732-1). (PMID:23474833)

Record type: Article

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical usefulness of a semi-structured diagnostic parent interview, i.e., the Kiddie-Disruptive Behavior Disorder Schedule (K-DBDS), in preschool children. For Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD), to define symptoms two coding methods were compared, i.e., one based on the threshold "often" and the other based on the frequency of behaviors in combination with the presence of clinical concern. For Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), to define symptoms, two coding methods were compared, i.e., one with and one without consideration of pervasiveness across contexts. Participants were referred preschool children with externalizing behavioral problems (N?=?193; 83% male) and typically developing (TD) children (N?=?58; 71% male). The referred children were given a diagnosis of either ODD/CD (N?=?39), or ADHD (N?=?58) or comorbid ODD/CD+ADHD (N?=?57) or no diagnosis (N?=?39) based on best-estimate diagnosis. Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analyses showed that a cutoff score of four ODD symptoms using "often" as the threshold for frequency of behaviors led to a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 93%; the coding method which included the frequency of behaviors yielded a sensitivity of 56% and a specificity of 100%. For ADHD, a clinical cutoff score of five symptoms without the pervasiveness criterion yielded a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 98%; when the pervasiveness criterion was included sensitivity was 77% and specificity 98%. In the clinical assessment of ODD and ADHD in preschool children, the K-DBDS may be used with ODD symptom definition based on the threshold "often" and ADHD pervasiveness across contexts not included.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 9 March 2013
Organisations: Social Statistics & Demography

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 369750
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/369750
ISSN: 0091-0627
PURE UUID: c6c2b77e-40f5-473d-802f-d781a8c7a4fa
ORCID for Peter G.M. van der Heijden: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3345-096X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Oct 2014 12:44
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:46

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Tessa L. Bunte
Author: Kim Schoemaker
Author: David J. Hessen
Author: Walter Matthys

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×