Molecular field theory for biaxial smectic A liquid crystals
Molecular field theory for biaxial smectic A liquid crystals
Thermotropic biaxial nematic phases seem to be rare, but biaxial smectic A phases less so. Here we use molecular field theory to study a simple two-parameter model, with one parameter promoting a biaxial phase and the second promoting smecticity. The theory combines the biaxial Maier-Saupe and McMillan models. We use alternatively the Sonnet-Virga-Durand (SVD) and geometric mean approximations (GMA) to characterize molecular biaxiality by a single parameter. For non-zero smecticity and biaxiality, the model always predicts a ground state biaxial smectic A phase. For a low degree of smectic order, the phase diagram is very rich, predicting uniaxial and biaxial nematic and smectic phases, with the addition of a variety of tricritical and tetracritical points. For higher degrees of smecticity, the region of stability of the biaxial nematic phase is restricted and eventually disappears, yielding to the biaxial smectic phase. Phase diagrams from the two alternative approximations for molecular biaxiality are similar, except inasmuch that SVD allows for a first-order isotropic-biaxial nematic transition, whereas GMA predicts a Landau point separating isotropic and biaxial nematic phases. We speculate that the rarity of thermotropic biaxial nematic phases is partly a consequence of the presence of stabler analogous smectic phases
134902-[14pp]
To, Tung B.T.
07914a27-ca25-4e9d-a855-bf5db2fd7ac3
Sluckin, Timothy J.
8dbb6b08-7034-4ae2-aa65-6b80072202f6
Luckhurst, Geoffrey R.
7807d1c6-54a1-414f-9abe-22de4d9c30f7
October 2013
To, Tung B.T.
07914a27-ca25-4e9d-a855-bf5db2fd7ac3
Sluckin, Timothy J.
8dbb6b08-7034-4ae2-aa65-6b80072202f6
Luckhurst, Geoffrey R.
7807d1c6-54a1-414f-9abe-22de4d9c30f7
To, Tung B.T., Sluckin, Timothy J. and Luckhurst, Geoffrey R.
(2013)
Molecular field theory for biaxial smectic A liquid crystals.
The Journal of Chemical Physics, 139, .
(doi:10.1063/1.4820555).
Abstract
Thermotropic biaxial nematic phases seem to be rare, but biaxial smectic A phases less so. Here we use molecular field theory to study a simple two-parameter model, with one parameter promoting a biaxial phase and the second promoting smecticity. The theory combines the biaxial Maier-Saupe and McMillan models. We use alternatively the Sonnet-Virga-Durand (SVD) and geometric mean approximations (GMA) to characterize molecular biaxiality by a single parameter. For non-zero smecticity and biaxiality, the model always predicts a ground state biaxial smectic A phase. For a low degree of smectic order, the phase diagram is very rich, predicting uniaxial and biaxial nematic and smectic phases, with the addition of a variety of tricritical and tetracritical points. For higher degrees of smecticity, the region of stability of the biaxial nematic phase is restricted and eventually disappears, yielding to the biaxial smectic phase. Phase diagrams from the two alternative approximations for molecular biaxiality are similar, except inasmuch that SVD allows for a first-order isotropic-biaxial nematic transition, whereas GMA predicts a Landau point separating isotropic and biaxial nematic phases. We speculate that the rarity of thermotropic biaxial nematic phases is partly a consequence of the presence of stabler analogous smectic phases
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: October 2013
Organisations:
Applied Mathematics
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 369793
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/369793
ISSN: 0021-9606
PURE UUID: fb267d20-141a-4143-9b59-345b974d60d7
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 13 Oct 2014 10:38
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:32
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Tung B.T. To
Author:
Geoffrey R. Luckhurst
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics