Managing summative computer-aided assessment failures: further evidence for 'optional substitution'


Harwood, Ian A. (2006) Managing summative computer-aided assessment failures: further evidence for 'optional substitution' British Journal of Educational Technology, 37, (4), pp. 637-641. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00583.x).

Download

Full text not available from this repository.

Description/Abstract

A recent BJET article (Harwood, 2005) has outlined how 'optional substitution' was used to recover from a large-scale summative CAA failure. This follow-up article draws on a new (full) data set to confirm the appropriateness of using maximum formative marks (rather than average formative scores for instance) as a proxy measure of summative performance. A decision-making aid is also provided to guide those unfortunate enough to be considering the use of optional substitution following a CAA failure.

Item Type: Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00583.x
Additional Information: Colloquium
ISSNs: 0007-1013 (print)
Subjects:

ePrint ID: 36999
Date :
Date Event
2006Published
Date Deposited: 23 May 2006
Last Modified: 16 Apr 2017 22:04
Further Information:Google Scholar
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/36999

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item