The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Immigration, rights and democracy

Immigration, rights and democracy
Immigration, rights and democracy
Arash Abizadeh has recently argued that political communities have no right to close their borders unilaterally, since by doing so they subject outsiders to coercion which lacks democratic justification. His conclusion is that any legitimate regime of border controls must be justified to outsiders. David Miller has sought to defend closed borders by distinguishing between coercion and prevention and arguing that the latter does not require democratic justification. This paper explores a different route, arguing firstly that the requirements of democracy do not provide us with practical guidance unless we also consider other values, such as rights, and secondly that being subject to coercion does not entitle one to democratic justification. These arguments suggest that Abizadeh is wrong to hold closed borders in need of democratic justification.
0040-5817
58-77
Saunders, Ben
aed7ba9f-f519-4bbf-a554-db25b684037d
Knight, Carl
2b211992-d2ea-43be-814a-7bc7c158ccfe
Saunders, Ben
aed7ba9f-f519-4bbf-a554-db25b684037d
Knight, Carl
2b211992-d2ea-43be-814a-7bc7c158ccfe

Saunders, Ben , Knight, Carl (ed.) (2011) Immigration, rights and democracy. [in special issue: Special Obligations, Rights and National Responsibility] Theoria, 58 (129), 58-77. (doi:10.3167/th.2011.5812905).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Arash Abizadeh has recently argued that political communities have no right to close their borders unilaterally, since by doing so they subject outsiders to coercion which lacks democratic justification. His conclusion is that any legitimate regime of border controls must be justified to outsiders. David Miller has sought to defend closed borders by distinguishing between coercion and prevention and arguing that the latter does not require democratic justification. This paper explores a different route, arguing firstly that the requirements of democracy do not provide us with practical guidance unless we also consider other values, such as rights, and secondly that being subject to coercion does not entitle one to democratic justification. These arguments suggest that Abizadeh is wrong to hold closed borders in need of democratic justification.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 December 2011
Organisations: Faculty of Social, Human and Mathematical Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 370310
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/370310
ISSN: 0040-5817
PURE UUID: 7c9c788f-6e00-4b7b-ac3c-4ff1877b589d
ORCID for Ben Saunders: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5147-6397

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 Oct 2014 14:30
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:50

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Ben Saunders ORCID iD
Editor: Carl Knight

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×