The restructuring of academic work in Australia: power, management and gender
The restructuring of academic work in Australia: power, management and gender
This paper examines how the restructuring of Australia's university system and the introduction of corporate managerialism has changed the work performed by academic staff. The paper illustrates how the emergence of higher education as both a major export industry and a vehicle for attaining greater international competitiveness has led to more intense regulation of academic work. Within a context of funding cutbacks, substantial inequities have emerged between and within universities, as they compete more aggressively for higher education markets. Hierarchical line management, with clear divisions between different categories of academic staff, has substantially replaced collegial forms of administration. This paper demonstrates how these processes have worked to undermine the effective implementation of Equal Employment Opportunity initiatives, as women remain concentrated in the lowest paid and least secure positions within universities.
257-267
Lafferty, George
cbae418b-1b7c-4dbb-b9ec-a088ff5511de
Fleming, Jenny
61449384-ccab-40b3-b494-0852c956ca19
28 June 2000
Lafferty, George
cbae418b-1b7c-4dbb-b9ec-a088ff5511de
Fleming, Jenny
61449384-ccab-40b3-b494-0852c956ca19
Lafferty, George and Fleming, Jenny
(2000)
The restructuring of academic work in Australia: power, management and gender.
British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21 (2), .
(doi:10.1080/713655344).
Abstract
This paper examines how the restructuring of Australia's university system and the introduction of corporate managerialism has changed the work performed by academic staff. The paper illustrates how the emergence of higher education as both a major export industry and a vehicle for attaining greater international competitiveness has led to more intense regulation of academic work. Within a context of funding cutbacks, substantial inequities have emerged between and within universities, as they compete more aggressively for higher education markets. Hierarchical line management, with clear divisions between different categories of academic staff, has substantially replaced collegial forms of administration. This paper demonstrates how these processes have worked to undermine the effective implementation of Equal Employment Opportunity initiatives, as women remain concentrated in the lowest paid and least secure positions within universities.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 28 June 2000
Organisations:
Faculty of Social, Human and Mathematical Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 370787
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/370787
ISSN: 0142-5692
PURE UUID: d6866f28-13a3-473a-b4c0-5b6671338229
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Nov 2014 12:25
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:41
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
George Lafferty
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics