The effect of transparency on recognition of overlapping objects
The effect of transparency on recognition of overlapping objects
Are overlapping objects easier to recognize when the objects are transparent or opaque? It is important to know whether the transparency of X-ray images of luggage contributes to the difficulty in searching those images for targets. Transparency provides extra information about objects that would normally be occluded but creates potentially ambiguous depth relations at the region of overlap. Two experiments investigated the threshold durations at which adult participants could accurately name pairs of overlapping objects that were opaque or transparent. In Experiment 1, the transparent displays included monocular cues to relative depth. Recognition of the back object was possible at shorter durations for transparent displays than for opaque displays. In Experiment 2, the transparent displays had no monocular depth cues. There was no difference in the duration at which the back object was recognized across transparent and opaque displays. The results of the two experiments suggest that transparent displays, even though less familiar than opaque displays, do not make object recognition more difficult, and possibly show a benefit. These findings call into question the importance of edge junctions in object recognition
158-170
Hillstrom, Anne
44c48770-8db7-4316-aa7b-bed366c031b4
Wakefield, H.
553861ba-b941-4f0c-bb2c-093f76cc3497
Scholey, H.
4c3b15ca-2aa9-4c25-a783-c5fbc5b6faed
June 2013
Hillstrom, Anne
44c48770-8db7-4316-aa7b-bed366c031b4
Wakefield, H.
553861ba-b941-4f0c-bb2c-093f76cc3497
Scholey, H.
4c3b15ca-2aa9-4c25-a783-c5fbc5b6faed
Hillstrom, Anne, Wakefield, H. and Scholey, H.
(2013)
The effect of transparency on recognition of overlapping objects.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 19 (2), .
(doi:10.1037/a0033367).
(PMID:23795982)
Abstract
Are overlapping objects easier to recognize when the objects are transparent or opaque? It is important to know whether the transparency of X-ray images of luggage contributes to the difficulty in searching those images for targets. Transparency provides extra information about objects that would normally be occluded but creates potentially ambiguous depth relations at the region of overlap. Two experiments investigated the threshold durations at which adult participants could accurately name pairs of overlapping objects that were opaque or transparent. In Experiment 1, the transparent displays included monocular cues to relative depth. Recognition of the back object was possible at shorter durations for transparent displays than for opaque displays. In Experiment 2, the transparent displays had no monocular depth cues. There was no difference in the duration at which the back object was recognized across transparent and opaque displays. The results of the two experiments suggest that transparent displays, even though less familiar than opaque displays, do not make object recognition more difficult, and possibly show a benefit. These findings call into question the importance of edge junctions in object recognition
Text
__soton.ac.uk_ude_personalfiles_users_ah7n13_mydesktop_Hillstrom_Wakefield_&_Scholey_in_press_April_2013.pdf
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
__soton.ac.uk_ude_personalfiles_users_ah7n13_mydesktop_Hillstrom_Wakefield_&_Scholey_in_press_April_2013.pdf
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Published date: June 2013
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 371611
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/371611
ISSN: 1076-898X
PURE UUID: 6590c7b0-6661-4778-ae53-f0fd19ab8272
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 14 Nov 2014 09:25
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 18:23
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Anne Hillstrom
Author:
H. Wakefield
Author:
H. Scholey
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics