Applying psychological science to the CCTV review process: a review of cognitive and ergonomic literature
Applying psychological science to the CCTV review process: a review of cognitive and ergonomic literature
As CCTV cameras are used more and more often to increase security in communities, police are spending a larger proportion of their resources, including time, in processing CCTV images when investigating crimes that have occurred (Levesley & Martin, 2005; Nichols, 2001). As with all tasks, there are ways to approach this task that will facilitate performance and other approaches that will degrade performance, either by increasing errors or by unnecessarily prolonging the process. A clearer understanding of psychological factors influencing the effectiveness of footage review will facilitate future training in best practice with respect to the review of CCTV footage. The goal of this report is to provide such understanding by reviewing research on footage review, research on related tasks that require similar skills, and experimental laboratory research about the cognitive skills underpinning the task. The report is organised to address five challenges to effectiveness of CCTV review: the effects of the degraded nature of CCTV footage, distractions and interrupts, the length of the task, inappropriate mindset, and variability in people’s abilities and experience. Recommendations for optimising CCTV footage review include (1) doing a cognitive task analysis to increase understanding of the ways in which performance might be limited, (2) exploiting technology advances to maximise the perceptual quality of the footage (3) training people to improve the flexibility of their mindset as they perceive and interpret the images seen, (4) monitoring performance either on an ongoing basis, by using psychophysiological measures of alertness, or periodically, by testing screeners’ ability to find evidence in footage developed for such testing, and (5) evaluating the relevance of possible selection tests to screen effective from ineffective screeners
Hillstrom, Anne
44c48770-8db7-4316-aa7b-bed366c031b4
Hope, Lorraine
d2d23f6a-fb96-4521-84df-910132f979e1
Nee, Claire
f231b874-f04c-4cf5-b787-f9c13f12d372
21 March 2008
Hillstrom, Anne
44c48770-8db7-4316-aa7b-bed366c031b4
Hope, Lorraine
d2d23f6a-fb96-4521-84df-910132f979e1
Nee, Claire
f231b874-f04c-4cf5-b787-f9c13f12d372
Hillstrom, Anne, Hope, Lorraine and Nee, Claire
(2008)
Applying psychological science to the CCTV review process: a review of cognitive and ergonomic literature
London, GB.
The Stationery Office
70pp.
Record type:
Monograph
(Working Paper)
Abstract
As CCTV cameras are used more and more often to increase security in communities, police are spending a larger proportion of their resources, including time, in processing CCTV images when investigating crimes that have occurred (Levesley & Martin, 2005; Nichols, 2001). As with all tasks, there are ways to approach this task that will facilitate performance and other approaches that will degrade performance, either by increasing errors or by unnecessarily prolonging the process. A clearer understanding of psychological factors influencing the effectiveness of footage review will facilitate future training in best practice with respect to the review of CCTV footage. The goal of this report is to provide such understanding by reviewing research on footage review, research on related tasks that require similar skills, and experimental laboratory research about the cognitive skills underpinning the task. The report is organised to address five challenges to effectiveness of CCTV review: the effects of the degraded nature of CCTV footage, distractions and interrupts, the length of the task, inappropriate mindset, and variability in people’s abilities and experience. Recommendations for optimising CCTV footage review include (1) doing a cognitive task analysis to increase understanding of the ways in which performance might be limited, (2) exploiting technology advances to maximise the perceptual quality of the footage (3) training people to improve the flexibility of their mindset as they perceive and interpret the images seen, (4) monitoring performance either on an ongoing basis, by using psychophysiological measures of alertness, or periodically, by testing screeners’ ability to find evidence in footage developed for such testing, and (5) evaluating the relevance of possible selection tests to screen effective from ineffective screeners
Text
__soton.ac.uk_ude_personalfiles_users_ah7n13_mydesktop_Hillstrom_Hope_Nee_HOSDB_report_2008.pdf
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Published date: 21 March 2008
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 371614
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/371614
PURE UUID: e6f9b522-674f-4878-99cf-435331fab43f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 14 Nov 2014 10:15
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 18:23
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Anne Hillstrom
Author:
Lorraine Hope
Author:
Claire Nee
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics