Attentional limitations in processing sequentially presented vibrotactile targets
Attentional limitations in processing sequentially presented vibrotactile targets
In seven experiments, participants experienced rapid, serially presented streams of vibrations and responded to specific targets in the streams. In visual (and sometimes auditory) streams presented in this manner, it is typical to find a deficit in reporting the second of two targets when both must be reported and the second appears within a short temporal interval of the first, but not when identical displays are presented but only the second target must be reported (e.g., the attentional blink, or AB). This conventional AB pattern was found in the last experiment, in which judgments were about target location. However in the first six experiments reported here, in which judgments were about frequency, intensity, duration, or location of targets, accuracy was dependent on target separation regardless of whether or not the first target was reported. This unconventional pattern could represent an AB if the first target was attended even when it was not reported. The evidence for this claim and an alternative possibility that location judgments are especially sensitive to attention manipulations are discussed
1068-1082
Hillstrom, Anne
44c48770-8db7-4316-aa7b-bed366c031b4
Shapiro, K.
e0cdc71a-0c27-4c2d-88b3-3005f468a982
Spence, C.
8b8af7b5-643c-4ee8-9b59-7087ec75c1e7
October 2002
Hillstrom, Anne
44c48770-8db7-4316-aa7b-bed366c031b4
Shapiro, K.
e0cdc71a-0c27-4c2d-88b3-3005f468a982
Spence, C.
8b8af7b5-643c-4ee8-9b59-7087ec75c1e7
Hillstrom, Anne, Shapiro, K. and Spence, C.
(2002)
Attentional limitations in processing sequentially presented vibrotactile targets.
Perception and Psychophysics, 64 (7), .
(doi:10.3758/BF03194757).
(PMID:12489662)
Abstract
In seven experiments, participants experienced rapid, serially presented streams of vibrations and responded to specific targets in the streams. In visual (and sometimes auditory) streams presented in this manner, it is typical to find a deficit in reporting the second of two targets when both must be reported and the second appears within a short temporal interval of the first, but not when identical displays are presented but only the second target must be reported (e.g., the attentional blink, or AB). This conventional AB pattern was found in the last experiment, in which judgments were about target location. However in the first six experiments reported here, in which judgments were about frequency, intensity, duration, or location of targets, accuracy was dependent on target separation regardless of whether or not the first target was reported. This unconventional pattern could represent an AB if the first target was attended even when it was not reported. The evidence for this claim and an alternative possibility that location judgments are especially sensitive to attention manipulations are discussed
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: October 2002
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 371620
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/371620
PURE UUID: c391b405-316b-4c46-b37d-dc8da5628913
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 17 Nov 2014 09:33
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 18:23
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Anne Hillstrom
Author:
K. Shapiro
Author:
C. Spence
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics