Counterfeit detection for new and old currency designs
Counterfeit detection for new and old currency designs
To test the effectiveness of counterfeit deterrence features recently introduced in US currency, observers were asked to discriminate genuine from counterfeit bills using a two-alternative forced-choice task. In Experiment 1, observers judged $100s with the new and old designs after receiving training in the deterrence features of each design. The counterfeits were representative of two common print processes: inkjet and offset printing. Judgments were made on whole bills, on individual features with the whole bill unmasked, and on individual features with only that feature visible. In Experiment 2, different observers judged $100s without any training. They then were trained and judged $50s and $20 bills. Taken together, the two experiments indicate that people are good at detecting counterfeits, that inkjet counterfeits are easier to detect than offset counterfeits, and that counterfeits of the newly designed bills are easier to detect than counterfeits of the older series. The design improvement was greatest with $100 bills and, to a lesser extent, $50 bills. Improvement was minimal with $20 bills, very likely because observers were very accurate for both series of $20s. Finally, some deterrence features were more useful than others in aiding discriminations
65-80
Optical Society of America
Hillstrom, Anne
44c48770-8db7-4316-aa7b-bed366c031b4
Bernstein, I.
762c3c0e-787b-4e0a-b04d-1e3f622bf35a
2002
Hillstrom, Anne
44c48770-8db7-4316-aa7b-bed366c031b4
Bernstein, I.
762c3c0e-787b-4e0a-b04d-1e3f622bf35a
Hillstrom, Anne and Bernstein, I.
(2002)
Counterfeit detection for new and old currency designs.
van Renesse, R.
(ed.)
In Optical Security and Counterfeit Deterrence Techniques IV.
vol. 4677,
Optical Society of America.
.
(doi:10.1117/12.462732).
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
To test the effectiveness of counterfeit deterrence features recently introduced in US currency, observers were asked to discriminate genuine from counterfeit bills using a two-alternative forced-choice task. In Experiment 1, observers judged $100s with the new and old designs after receiving training in the deterrence features of each design. The counterfeits were representative of two common print processes: inkjet and offset printing. Judgments were made on whole bills, on individual features with the whole bill unmasked, and on individual features with only that feature visible. In Experiment 2, different observers judged $100s without any training. They then were trained and judged $50s and $20 bills. Taken together, the two experiments indicate that people are good at detecting counterfeits, that inkjet counterfeits are easier to detect than offset counterfeits, and that counterfeits of the newly designed bills are easier to detect than counterfeits of the older series. The design improvement was greatest with $100 bills and, to a lesser extent, $50 bills. Improvement was minimal with $20 bills, very likely because observers were very accurate for both series of $20s. Finally, some deterrence features were more useful than others in aiding discriminations
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2002
Venue - Dates:
Optical Security and Counterfeit Deterrence Techniques IV, San Jose, United States, 2002-01-01
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 371623
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/371623
ISSN: 0277-786X
PURE UUID: e8383940-a3e0-4bc3-b256-ccc5f4b70942
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 17 Nov 2014 11:26
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 18:23
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Anne Hillstrom
Author:
I. Bernstein
Editor:
R. van Renesse
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics