The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Exercise for reducing fear of falling in older people living in the community

Exercise for reducing fear of falling in older people living in the community
Exercise for reducing fear of falling in older people living in the community
Background

Fear of falling is common in older people and associated with serious physical and psychosocial consequences. Exercise (planned, structured, repetitive and purposive physical activity aimed at improving physical fitness) may reduce fear of falling by improving strength, gait, balance and mood, and reducing the occurrence of falls.

Objectives

To assess the effects (benefits, harms and costs) of exercise interventions for reducing fear of falling in older people living in the community.

Search methods

We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (July 2013), the Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2013, Issue 7), MEDLINE (1946 to July Week 3 2013), EMBASE (1980 to 2013 Week 30), CINAHL (1982 to July 2013), PsycINFO (1967 to August 2013), AMED (1985 to August 2013), the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (accessed 7 August 2013) and Current Controlled Trials (accessed 7 August 2013). We applied no language restrictions. We handsearched reference lists and consulted experts.

Selection criteria

We included randomised and quasi-randomised trials that recruited community-dwelling people (where the majority were aged 65 and over) and were not restricted to specific medical conditions (e.g. stroke, hip fracture). We included trials that evaluated exercise interventions compared with no intervention or a non-exercise intervention (e.g. social visits), and that measured fear of falling. Exercise interventions were varied; for example, they could be 'prescriptions' or recommendations, group-based or individual, supervised or unsupervised.

Data collection and analysis

Pairs of review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, assessed the risk of bias in the studies and extracted data. We combined effect sizes across studies using the fixed-effect model, with the random-effect model used where significant statistical heterogeneity was present. We estimated risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and incidence rate ratios (IRR) for rate outcomes. We estimated mean differences (MD) where studies used the same continuous measures and standardised mean differences (SMD) where different measures or different formats of the same measure were used. Where possible, we performed various, usually prespecified, sensitivity and subgroup analyses.

Main results

We included 30 studies, which evaluated 3D exercise (Tai Chi and yoga), balance training or strength and resistance training. Two of these were cluster-randomised trials, two were cross-over trials and one was quasi-randomised. The studies included a total of 2878 participants with a mean age ranging from 68 to 85 years. Most studies included more women than men, with four studies recruiting women only. Twelve studies recruited participants at increased risk of falls; three of these recruited participants who also had fear of falling.

Poor reporting of the allocation methods in the trials made it difficult to assess the risk of selection bias in most studies. All of the studies were at high risk of performance and detection biases as there was no blinding of participants and outcome assessors and the outcomes were self reported. Twelve studies were at high risk of attrition bias. Using GRADE criteria, we judged the quality of evidence to be 'low' for fear of falling immediately post intervention and 'very low' for fear of falling at short or long-term follow-up and all other outcomes.

Exercise interventions were associated with a small to moderate reduction in fear of falling immediately post intervention (SMD 0.37 favouring exercise, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18 to 0.56; 24 studies; 1692 participants, low quality evidence). Pooled effect sizes did not differ significantly between the different scales used to measure fear of falling. Although none of the sensitivity analyses changed the direction of effect, the greatest reduction in the size of the effect was on removal of an extreme outlier study with 73 participants (SMD 0.24 favouring exercise, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.36). None of our subgroup analyses provided robust evidence of differences in effect in terms of either the study primary aim (reduction of fear of falling or other aim), the study population (recruitment on the basis of increased falls risk or not), the characteristics of the study exercise intervention or the study control intervention (no treatment or alternative intervention). However, there was some weak evidence of a smaller effect, which included no reduction, of exercise when compared with an alternative control.

There was very low quality evidence that exercise interventions may be associated with a small reduction in fear of falling up to six months post intervention (SMD 0.17, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.38; four studies, 356 participants) and more than six months post intervention (SMD 0.20, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.41; three studies, 386 participants).

Very low quality evidence suggests exercise interventions in these studies that also reported on fear of falling reduced the risk of falling measured either as participants incurring at least one fall during follow-up or the number of falls during follow-up. Very low quality evidence from four studies indicated that exercise interventions did not appear to reduce symptoms of depression or increase physical activity. The only study reporting the effects of exercise interventions on anxiety found no difference between groups. No studies reported the effects of exercise interventions on activity avoidance or costs. It is important to remember that our included studies do not represent the totality of the evidence of the effect of exercise interventions on falls, depression, anxiety or physical activity as our review only includes studies that reported fear of falling.

Authors' conclusions

Exercise interventions in community-dwelling older people probably reduce fear of falling to a limited extent immediately after the intervention, without increasing the risk or frequency of falls. There is insufficient evidence to determine whether exercise interventions reduce fear of falling beyond the end of the intervention or their effect on other outcomes. Although further evidence from well-designed randomised trials is required, priority should be given to establishing a core set of outcomes that includes fear of falling for all trials examining the effects of exercise interventions in older people living in the community.
1469-493X
1-134
Kendrick, Denise
33ad9db9-6d98-4e87-a2ad-323b289e3a16
Kumar, Arun
8ffc3591-5e44-4ffb-8a96-28783dab800d
Carpenter, Hannah
11765a47-625a-49d9-9704-1a186dd836d9
Zijlstra, G.A. Rixt
03b8b43d-94fa-4321-9779-e632ab6b56d1
Skelton, Dawn A.
aa97ecd5-76c1-488a-bb40-98f815e920ab
Cook, Juliette R.
2e5872e0-afa0-4370-969e-fad4c43deff1
Stevens, Zoe
63fe4e94-7b55-4a94-bd50-77c607646528
Belcher, Carolyn M.
d2e749fb-05c5-49a1-a33a-00b31daa9b4e
Haworth, Deborah
a10e6b60-8257-4e57-92f8-a44b95037a59
Gawler, Sheena J.
7c79744e-506b-4818-bc1e-660dd9f441e6
Gage, Heather
19bfbcaf-5cec-4ca4-8830-53216e56a460
Masud, Tahir
ef1fc17c-f133-4635-82bb-547b58521ceb
Bowling, Ann
796ca209-687f-4079-8a40-572076251936
Pearl, Mirilee
2f690323-e7b0-474e-b532-691d212078ad
Morris, Richard W.
db5b905e-be9a-439c-bdee-47b01a953e7e
Iliffe, Steve
3608ad54-c5c6-44c3-8ea8-011412b6c78d
Delbaere, Kim
28d7debd-af82-4173-83a4-b6b4948377ad
Kendrick, Denise
33ad9db9-6d98-4e87-a2ad-323b289e3a16
Kumar, Arun
8ffc3591-5e44-4ffb-8a96-28783dab800d
Carpenter, Hannah
11765a47-625a-49d9-9704-1a186dd836d9
Zijlstra, G.A. Rixt
03b8b43d-94fa-4321-9779-e632ab6b56d1
Skelton, Dawn A.
aa97ecd5-76c1-488a-bb40-98f815e920ab
Cook, Juliette R.
2e5872e0-afa0-4370-969e-fad4c43deff1
Stevens, Zoe
63fe4e94-7b55-4a94-bd50-77c607646528
Belcher, Carolyn M.
d2e749fb-05c5-49a1-a33a-00b31daa9b4e
Haworth, Deborah
a10e6b60-8257-4e57-92f8-a44b95037a59
Gawler, Sheena J.
7c79744e-506b-4818-bc1e-660dd9f441e6
Gage, Heather
19bfbcaf-5cec-4ca4-8830-53216e56a460
Masud, Tahir
ef1fc17c-f133-4635-82bb-547b58521ceb
Bowling, Ann
796ca209-687f-4079-8a40-572076251936
Pearl, Mirilee
2f690323-e7b0-474e-b532-691d212078ad
Morris, Richard W.
db5b905e-be9a-439c-bdee-47b01a953e7e
Iliffe, Steve
3608ad54-c5c6-44c3-8ea8-011412b6c78d
Delbaere, Kim
28d7debd-af82-4173-83a4-b6b4948377ad

Kendrick, Denise, Kumar, Arun, Carpenter, Hannah, Zijlstra, G.A. Rixt, Skelton, Dawn A., Cook, Juliette R., Stevens, Zoe, Belcher, Carolyn M., Haworth, Deborah, Gawler, Sheena J., Gage, Heather, Masud, Tahir, Bowling, Ann, Pearl, Mirilee, Morris, Richard W., Iliffe, Steve and Delbaere, Kim (2014) Exercise for reducing fear of falling in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 11 (CD00984), 1-134. (doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009848.pub2). (PMID:25432016)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background

Fear of falling is common in older people and associated with serious physical and psychosocial consequences. Exercise (planned, structured, repetitive and purposive physical activity aimed at improving physical fitness) may reduce fear of falling by improving strength, gait, balance and mood, and reducing the occurrence of falls.

Objectives

To assess the effects (benefits, harms and costs) of exercise interventions for reducing fear of falling in older people living in the community.

Search methods

We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (July 2013), the Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2013, Issue 7), MEDLINE (1946 to July Week 3 2013), EMBASE (1980 to 2013 Week 30), CINAHL (1982 to July 2013), PsycINFO (1967 to August 2013), AMED (1985 to August 2013), the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (accessed 7 August 2013) and Current Controlled Trials (accessed 7 August 2013). We applied no language restrictions. We handsearched reference lists and consulted experts.

Selection criteria

We included randomised and quasi-randomised trials that recruited community-dwelling people (where the majority were aged 65 and over) and were not restricted to specific medical conditions (e.g. stroke, hip fracture). We included trials that evaluated exercise interventions compared with no intervention or a non-exercise intervention (e.g. social visits), and that measured fear of falling. Exercise interventions were varied; for example, they could be 'prescriptions' or recommendations, group-based or individual, supervised or unsupervised.

Data collection and analysis

Pairs of review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, assessed the risk of bias in the studies and extracted data. We combined effect sizes across studies using the fixed-effect model, with the random-effect model used where significant statistical heterogeneity was present. We estimated risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and incidence rate ratios (IRR) for rate outcomes. We estimated mean differences (MD) where studies used the same continuous measures and standardised mean differences (SMD) where different measures or different formats of the same measure were used. Where possible, we performed various, usually prespecified, sensitivity and subgroup analyses.

Main results

We included 30 studies, which evaluated 3D exercise (Tai Chi and yoga), balance training or strength and resistance training. Two of these were cluster-randomised trials, two were cross-over trials and one was quasi-randomised. The studies included a total of 2878 participants with a mean age ranging from 68 to 85 years. Most studies included more women than men, with four studies recruiting women only. Twelve studies recruited participants at increased risk of falls; three of these recruited participants who also had fear of falling.

Poor reporting of the allocation methods in the trials made it difficult to assess the risk of selection bias in most studies. All of the studies were at high risk of performance and detection biases as there was no blinding of participants and outcome assessors and the outcomes were self reported. Twelve studies were at high risk of attrition bias. Using GRADE criteria, we judged the quality of evidence to be 'low' for fear of falling immediately post intervention and 'very low' for fear of falling at short or long-term follow-up and all other outcomes.

Exercise interventions were associated with a small to moderate reduction in fear of falling immediately post intervention (SMD 0.37 favouring exercise, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18 to 0.56; 24 studies; 1692 participants, low quality evidence). Pooled effect sizes did not differ significantly between the different scales used to measure fear of falling. Although none of the sensitivity analyses changed the direction of effect, the greatest reduction in the size of the effect was on removal of an extreme outlier study with 73 participants (SMD 0.24 favouring exercise, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.36). None of our subgroup analyses provided robust evidence of differences in effect in terms of either the study primary aim (reduction of fear of falling or other aim), the study population (recruitment on the basis of increased falls risk or not), the characteristics of the study exercise intervention or the study control intervention (no treatment or alternative intervention). However, there was some weak evidence of a smaller effect, which included no reduction, of exercise when compared with an alternative control.

There was very low quality evidence that exercise interventions may be associated with a small reduction in fear of falling up to six months post intervention (SMD 0.17, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.38; four studies, 356 participants) and more than six months post intervention (SMD 0.20, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.41; three studies, 386 participants).

Very low quality evidence suggests exercise interventions in these studies that also reported on fear of falling reduced the risk of falling measured either as participants incurring at least one fall during follow-up or the number of falls during follow-up. Very low quality evidence from four studies indicated that exercise interventions did not appear to reduce symptoms of depression or increase physical activity. The only study reporting the effects of exercise interventions on anxiety found no difference between groups. No studies reported the effects of exercise interventions on activity avoidance or costs. It is important to remember that our included studies do not represent the totality of the evidence of the effect of exercise interventions on falls, depression, anxiety or physical activity as our review only includes studies that reported fear of falling.

Authors' conclusions

Exercise interventions in community-dwelling older people probably reduce fear of falling to a limited extent immediately after the intervention, without increasing the risk or frequency of falls. There is insufficient evidence to determine whether exercise interventions reduce fear of falling beyond the end of the intervention or their effect on other outcomes. Although further evidence from well-designed randomised trials is required, priority should be given to establishing a core set of outcomes that includes fear of falling for all trials examining the effects of exercise interventions in older people living in the community.

Text
pdf - Version of Record
Download (8kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 30 July 2013
e-pub ahead of print date: 28 November 2014
Published date: 28 November 2014
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 372357
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/372357
ISSN: 1469-493X
PURE UUID: 1ad7d52e-3ef7-4396-8418-9c1ba586d603

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Dec 2014 15:53
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 18:35

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Denise Kendrick
Author: Arun Kumar
Author: Hannah Carpenter
Author: G.A. Rixt Zijlstra
Author: Dawn A. Skelton
Author: Juliette R. Cook
Author: Zoe Stevens
Author: Carolyn M. Belcher
Author: Deborah Haworth
Author: Sheena J. Gawler
Author: Heather Gage
Author: Tahir Masud
Author: Ann Bowling
Author: Mirilee Pearl
Author: Richard W. Morris
Author: Steve Iliffe
Author: Kim Delbaere

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×