The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Conservative care for ESRD in the United Kingdom: a national survey

Conservative care for ESRD in the United Kingdom: a national survey
Conservative care for ESRD in the United Kingdom: a national survey
Background and objectives

Conservative kidney management (CKM) has been developed in the United Kingdom (UK) as an alternative to dialysis for older patients with stage 5 CKD (CKD5) and multiple comorbidities. This national survey sought to describe the current scale and pattern of delivery of conservative care in UK renal units and identify their priorities for its future development.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements

A survey on practice patterns of CKM for patients age 75 and older with CKD5 was sent to clinical directors of all 71 adult renal units in the UK in March 2013.

Results

Sixty-seven units (94%) responded. All but one unit reported providing CKM for some patients. Terminology varied, although "conservative management" was the most frequently used term (46%). Lack of an agreed-upon definition of when a patient is receiving CKM made it difficult to obtain meaningful data on the numbers of such patients. Fifty-two percent provided the number of CKM patients age ?75 years in 2012; the median was 45 per unit (interquartile range [IQR], 20–83). The median number of symptomatic CKM patients who would otherwise have started dialysis was eight (IQR, 4.5–22). CKM practice patterns varied: 35% had a written guideline, 23% had dedicated CKM clinics, 45% had dedicated staff, and 50% provided staff training on CKM. Most units (88%) provided primary care clinicians with information/advice regarding CKM. Eighty percent identified a need for better evidence comparing outcomes on CKM versus dialysis, and 65% considered it appropriate to enter patients into a randomized trial.

Conclusions

CKM is provided in almost all UK renal units, but scale and organization vary widely. Lack of common terminology and definitions hinders the development and assessment of CKM. Many survey respondents expressed support for further research comparing outcomes with conservative care versus dialysis.
1555-9041
1-7
Okamoto, Ikumi
fc9b4fed-0c78-4925-9e6f-2bfa7c3d48bc
Tonkin-Crine, Sarah
65679835-9bdc-48b6-92f3-cc6322cccc4f
Rayner, Hugh
d9309eea-acda-449d-9759-3b7d5561ef80
Murtagh, Fliss E.M.
70c29ac0-d67c-4f1b-ac20-20ba9159dd24
Farrington, Ken
e69bbe63-89d8-44a6-9467-3da4ceae90bd
Caskey, Fergus
5f576f0a-f2da-473d-82fe-a2b684b9fb29
Tomson, Charles
d9044890-5faf-4d0c-b685-5cfa41929c44
Loud, Fiona
ab825fa4-029a-4cb9-8cac-ef4621f524f7
Greenwood, Roger
816a6c73-e3ab-4af9-99d2-9c43fa157d6a
O'Donoghue, Donal J.
0ea534df-89b7-427d-bcb7-fd2e9a60fa6b
Roderick, Paul
e5ecc991-931d-44ae-9cb3-02f644f61e63
Okamoto, Ikumi
fc9b4fed-0c78-4925-9e6f-2bfa7c3d48bc
Tonkin-Crine, Sarah
65679835-9bdc-48b6-92f3-cc6322cccc4f
Rayner, Hugh
d9309eea-acda-449d-9759-3b7d5561ef80
Murtagh, Fliss E.M.
70c29ac0-d67c-4f1b-ac20-20ba9159dd24
Farrington, Ken
e69bbe63-89d8-44a6-9467-3da4ceae90bd
Caskey, Fergus
5f576f0a-f2da-473d-82fe-a2b684b9fb29
Tomson, Charles
d9044890-5faf-4d0c-b685-5cfa41929c44
Loud, Fiona
ab825fa4-029a-4cb9-8cac-ef4621f524f7
Greenwood, Roger
816a6c73-e3ab-4af9-99d2-9c43fa157d6a
O'Donoghue, Donal J.
0ea534df-89b7-427d-bcb7-fd2e9a60fa6b
Roderick, Paul
e5ecc991-931d-44ae-9cb3-02f644f61e63

Okamoto, Ikumi, Tonkin-Crine, Sarah, Rayner, Hugh, Murtagh, Fliss E.M., Farrington, Ken, Caskey, Fergus, Tomson, Charles, Loud, Fiona, Greenwood, Roger, O'Donoghue, Donal J. and Roderick, Paul (2014) Conservative care for ESRD in the United Kingdom: a national survey. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 1-7. (doi:10.2215/CJN.05000514). (PMID:25388518)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background and objectives

Conservative kidney management (CKM) has been developed in the United Kingdom (UK) as an alternative to dialysis for older patients with stage 5 CKD (CKD5) and multiple comorbidities. This national survey sought to describe the current scale and pattern of delivery of conservative care in UK renal units and identify their priorities for its future development.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements

A survey on practice patterns of CKM for patients age 75 and older with CKD5 was sent to clinical directors of all 71 adult renal units in the UK in March 2013.

Results

Sixty-seven units (94%) responded. All but one unit reported providing CKM for some patients. Terminology varied, although "conservative management" was the most frequently used term (46%). Lack of an agreed-upon definition of when a patient is receiving CKM made it difficult to obtain meaningful data on the numbers of such patients. Fifty-two percent provided the number of CKM patients age ?75 years in 2012; the median was 45 per unit (interquartile range [IQR], 20–83). The median number of symptomatic CKM patients who would otherwise have started dialysis was eight (IQR, 4.5–22). CKM practice patterns varied: 35% had a written guideline, 23% had dedicated CKM clinics, 45% had dedicated staff, and 50% provided staff training on CKM. Most units (88%) provided primary care clinicians with information/advice regarding CKM. Eighty percent identified a need for better evidence comparing outcomes on CKM versus dialysis, and 65% considered it appropriate to enter patients into a randomized trial.

Conclusions

CKM is provided in almost all UK renal units, but scale and organization vary widely. Lack of common terminology and definitions hinders the development and assessment of CKM. Many survey respondents expressed support for further research comparing outcomes with conservative care versus dialysis.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: 11 November 2014
Organisations: Primary Care & Population Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 372682
URI: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/372682
ISSN: 1555-9041
PURE UUID: 0487eaa4-bec6-4bec-b613-5ad706cabfc6

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Dec 2014 16:56
Last modified: 15 Jul 2019 21:35

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Ikumi Okamoto
Author: Sarah Tonkin-Crine
Author: Hugh Rayner
Author: Fliss E.M. Murtagh
Author: Ken Farrington
Author: Fergus Caskey
Author: Charles Tomson
Author: Fiona Loud
Author: Roger Greenwood
Author: Donal J. O'Donoghue
Author: Paul Roderick

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×