The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Survey and online discussion groups to develop a patient-rated outcome measure on acceptability of treatment response in vitiligo

Survey and online discussion groups to develop a patient-rated outcome measure on acceptability of treatment response in vitiligo
Survey and online discussion groups to develop a patient-rated outcome measure on acceptability of treatment response in vitiligo
Background
Vitiligo is a chronic depigmenting skin disorder which affects around 0.5-1% of the world’s population. The outcome measures used most commonly in trials to judge treatment success focus on repigmentation. Patient-reported outcome measures of treatment success are rarely used, although recommendations have been made for their inclusion in vitiligo trials. This study aimed to evaluate the face validity of a new patient-reported outcome measure of treatment response, for use in future trials and clinical practice.

Method
An online survey to gather initial views on what constitutes treatment success for people with vitiligo or their parents/carers, followed by online discussion groups with patients to reach consensus on what constitutes treatment success for individuals with vitiligo, and how this can be assessed in the context of trials. Participants were recruited from an existing database of vitiligo patients and through posts on the social network sites Facebook and Twitter.

Results
A total of 202 survey responses were received, of which 37 were excluded and 165 analysed. Three main themes emerged as important in assessing treatment response: a) the match between vitiligo and normal skin (how well it blends in); b) how noticeable the vitiligo is and c) a reduction in the size of the white patches. The majority of respondents said they would consider 80% or more repigmentation to be a worthwhile treatment response after 9 months of treatment. Three online discussion groups involving 12 participants led to consensus that treatment success is best measured by asking patients how noticeable their vitiligo is after treatment. This was judged to be best answered using a 5-point Likert scale, on which a score of 4 or 5 represents treatment success.

Conclusions
This study represents the first step in developing a patient reported measure of treatment success in vitiligo trials. Further work is now needed to assess its construct validity and responsiveness to change.
1471-5945
1-12
Tour, Selina K.
f46dd373-06c8-4ccf-aa44-430103463d78
Thomas, Kim S.
f21619f9-467f-45dd-b9d4-be4014f11f3b
Walker, Dawn-Marie
5d4c78b7-4411-493e-8844-b64efc72a1e8
Leighton, Paul
ab276b64-0002-46cb-a729-88052d462c72
Yong, Adrian S.W.
8fddbfce-a03a-4e41-9047-f7c1bfa4d73f
Batchelor, Jonathan M.
bcc94d25-4ff7-4fec-b940-74c0ac19064c
Tour, Selina K.
f46dd373-06c8-4ccf-aa44-430103463d78
Thomas, Kim S.
f21619f9-467f-45dd-b9d4-be4014f11f3b
Walker, Dawn-Marie
5d4c78b7-4411-493e-8844-b64efc72a1e8
Leighton, Paul
ab276b64-0002-46cb-a729-88052d462c72
Yong, Adrian S.W.
8fddbfce-a03a-4e41-9047-f7c1bfa4d73f
Batchelor, Jonathan M.
bcc94d25-4ff7-4fec-b940-74c0ac19064c

Tour, Selina K., Thomas, Kim S., Walker, Dawn-Marie, Leighton, Paul, Yong, Adrian S.W. and Batchelor, Jonathan M. (2014) Survey and online discussion groups to develop a patient-rated outcome measure on acceptability of treatment response in vitiligo. BMC Dermatology, 14 (10), 1-12. (doi:10.1186/1471-5945-14-10).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background
Vitiligo is a chronic depigmenting skin disorder which affects around 0.5-1% of the world’s population. The outcome measures used most commonly in trials to judge treatment success focus on repigmentation. Patient-reported outcome measures of treatment success are rarely used, although recommendations have been made for their inclusion in vitiligo trials. This study aimed to evaluate the face validity of a new patient-reported outcome measure of treatment response, for use in future trials and clinical practice.

Method
An online survey to gather initial views on what constitutes treatment success for people with vitiligo or their parents/carers, followed by online discussion groups with patients to reach consensus on what constitutes treatment success for individuals with vitiligo, and how this can be assessed in the context of trials. Participants were recruited from an existing database of vitiligo patients and through posts on the social network sites Facebook and Twitter.

Results
A total of 202 survey responses were received, of which 37 were excluded and 165 analysed. Three main themes emerged as important in assessing treatment response: a) the match between vitiligo and normal skin (how well it blends in); b) how noticeable the vitiligo is and c) a reduction in the size of the white patches. The majority of respondents said they would consider 80% or more repigmentation to be a worthwhile treatment response after 9 months of treatment. Three online discussion groups involving 12 participants led to consensus that treatment success is best measured by asking patients how noticeable their vitiligo is after treatment. This was judged to be best answered using a 5-point Likert scale, on which a score of 4 or 5 represents treatment success.

Conclusions
This study represents the first step in developing a patient reported measure of treatment success in vitiligo trials. Further work is now needed to assess its construct validity and responsiveness to change.

Text
__userfiles.soton.ac.uk_Users_slb1_mydesktop_1471-5945-14-10.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License Other.
Download (560kB)

More information

Published date: 2014
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 372776
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/372776
ISSN: 1471-5945
PURE UUID: 3cf6a415-8bdc-4dfc-8695-d4d2d395a9d0
ORCID for Dawn-Marie Walker: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2135-1363

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Dec 2014 11:50
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:51

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Selina K. Tour
Author: Kim S. Thomas
Author: Dawn-Marie Walker ORCID iD
Author: Paul Leighton
Author: Adrian S.W. Yong
Author: Jonathan M. Batchelor

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×