The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Permissive hypoxaemia versus normoxaemia for mechanically ventilated critically ill patients

Gilbert-Kawai, Edward T., Mitchell, Kay, Martin, Daniel, Carlisle, John and Grocott, Michael P.W. (2014) Permissive hypoxaemia versus normoxaemia for mechanically ventilated critically ill patients Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 5, CD009931. (doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009931.pub2). (PMID:24801519).

Record type: Article


This comprehensive review failed to identify any relevant studies evaluating permissive hypoxaemia versus normoxaemia in mechanically ventilated critically ill participants. Therefore we are unable to support or refute the hypothesis that this treatment strategy is of benefit to patients.Given the substantial amount of provocative evidence derived from related clinical contexts (resuscitation, myocardial infarction, stroke), we believe that this review highlights an important unanswered question within critical care. In the presence of two competing harms (hypoxia and hyperoxia), it will be important to carefully evaluate the safety and feasibility of permissive hypoxaemia before proceeding to efficacy and effectiveness trials.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 7 May 2014
Organisations: Clinical & Experimental Sciences


Local EPrints ID: 372841
ISSN: 1469-493X
PURE UUID: ab394f21-0a9a-48da-bd5e-1c89e5821180

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Dec 2014 13:20
Last modified: 17 Jul 2017 21:38

Export record



Author: Edward T. Gilbert-Kawai
Author: Kay Mitchell
Author: Daniel Martin
Author: John Carlisle

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton:

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.