The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Towards inclusive teacher education: sensitising individuals to how they learn

Towards inclusive teacher education: sensitising individuals to how they learn
Towards inclusive teacher education: sensitising individuals to how they learn
Higher education has struggled to acknowledge and translate into better teaching and learning practices that sizeable literature base suggesting a link between cognitive style, learning preferences, and performance. Research is reported in which 80 undergraduate students on a primary education degree were studied to examine the relationship between their cognitive style, their learning preferences, and perceived impact on their teaching practices. All students completed the CSA measure of cognitive style, the ASSIST, two further questionnaires exploring learning preferences and perception of good teaching during the course, and an evaluation at the end of the teaching unit. Significant differences were found between the three cognitive styles investigated: wholist, intermediate, and analytic. In terms of learning preferences, using ANOVA statistically significant differences were found between the three styles with wholists being most concerned about speed of delivery and least liking computer-assisted learning. In addition, wholists preferred less structure than analytics in their teaching and claimed to use more images while analytics claimed to use more speech in their teaching. Intermediates demonstrated a greater preference for tangential approaches to teaching and were least happy with the nature of the teaching they had received while at university. Many of the differences reported in the literature between the different cognitive styles were not evident in this study. However, the interpersonal and intrapersonal characteristics of wholists and analytics, respectively, were evident and perceived to impact on planning and delivery in the classroom. While further school-based research involving greater numbers is required, interest in learning styles remains especially relevant if one intends to offer a truly inclusive education for all learners.
0144-3410
499-518
Evans, C.
feb8235f-ae58-46ab-847e-785137d61131
Waring, M.
fb1dd8e8-858e-48df-8859-11ac36ddd7ee
Evans, C.
feb8235f-ae58-46ab-847e-785137d61131
Waring, M.
fb1dd8e8-858e-48df-8859-11ac36ddd7ee

Evans, C. and Waring, M. (2006) Towards inclusive teacher education: sensitising individuals to how they learn. Educational Psychology, 26 (4), 499-518. (doi:10.1080/01443410500342484).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Higher education has struggled to acknowledge and translate into better teaching and learning practices that sizeable literature base suggesting a link between cognitive style, learning preferences, and performance. Research is reported in which 80 undergraduate students on a primary education degree were studied to examine the relationship between their cognitive style, their learning preferences, and perceived impact on their teaching practices. All students completed the CSA measure of cognitive style, the ASSIST, two further questionnaires exploring learning preferences and perception of good teaching during the course, and an evaluation at the end of the teaching unit. Significant differences were found between the three cognitive styles investigated: wholist, intermediate, and analytic. In terms of learning preferences, using ANOVA statistically significant differences were found between the three styles with wholists being most concerned about speed of delivery and least liking computer-assisted learning. In addition, wholists preferred less structure than analytics in their teaching and claimed to use more images while analytics claimed to use more speech in their teaching. Intermediates demonstrated a greater preference for tangential approaches to teaching and were least happy with the nature of the teaching they had received while at university. Many of the differences reported in the literature between the different cognitive styles were not evident in this study. However, the interpersonal and intrapersonal characteristics of wholists and analytics, respectively, were evident and perceived to impact on planning and delivery in the classroom. While further school-based research involving greater numbers is required, interest in learning styles remains especially relevant if one intends to offer a truly inclusive education for all learners.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 20 August 2006
Organisations: Southampton Education School

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 373898
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/373898
ISSN: 0144-3410
PURE UUID: fd0985c3-e688-4f5c-b9dc-aa09fac41aa4

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Jan 2015 15:11
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 18:59

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: C. Evans
Author: M. Waring

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×