Examining the significance of urban–rural context in tobacco quitline use: does rurality matter?
Examining the significance of urban–rural context in tobacco quitline use: does rurality matter?
Objectives: the purpose of this study was to examine the importance of urban–rural context as a determinant of call rates to smoking cessation lines.
Methods: this study used individual level New Zealand Quitline call data from 2005 to 2009, and 2006 New Zealand Census data on smoking to calculate Quitline call rates for smokers. Negative binomial regression examined the relationship between call rates and a sevenfold urban–rural classification, controlling for age, sex, ethnicity and deprivation.
Results: we found a significant urban–rural gradient in the rate of smokers calling Quitline. Rates were highest among smokers in main-urban areas [0.09 (95 % confidence interval (CI) = 0.089, 0.091)] decreasing with successive urban–rural classifications to the lowest rate in rural/remote areas [0.036 (95 % CI = 0.03, 0.04)]. This association was not confounded by age, sex, ethnicity or deprivation.
Conclusions: smokers in rural areas are less likely to use the New Zealand Quitline, even after controlling for confounding factors. This suggests that the national quitline is less effective in reaching rural smokers and more attention to the promotion of smoking cessation in rural communities is needed
1-7
Griffin, Edward
7da124f6-c786-431d-b037-e336d62c9f3c
Moon, Graham
68cffc4d-72c1-41e9-b1fa-1570c5f3a0b4
Barnet, Ross
937f714f-31e1-43db-9825-97fb969aaed5
19 December 2014
Griffin, Edward
7da124f6-c786-431d-b037-e336d62c9f3c
Moon, Graham
68cffc4d-72c1-41e9-b1fa-1570c5f3a0b4
Barnet, Ross
937f714f-31e1-43db-9825-97fb969aaed5
Griffin, Edward, Moon, Graham and Barnet, Ross
(2014)
Examining the significance of urban–rural context in tobacco quitline use: does rurality matter?
International Journal of Public Health, .
(doi:10.1007/s00038-014-0634-y).
(PMID:25523137)
Abstract
Objectives: the purpose of this study was to examine the importance of urban–rural context as a determinant of call rates to smoking cessation lines.
Methods: this study used individual level New Zealand Quitline call data from 2005 to 2009, and 2006 New Zealand Census data on smoking to calculate Quitline call rates for smokers. Negative binomial regression examined the relationship between call rates and a sevenfold urban–rural classification, controlling for age, sex, ethnicity and deprivation.
Results: we found a significant urban–rural gradient in the rate of smokers calling Quitline. Rates were highest among smokers in main-urban areas [0.09 (95 % confidence interval (CI) = 0.089, 0.091)] decreasing with successive urban–rural classifications to the lowest rate in rural/remote areas [0.036 (95 % CI = 0.03, 0.04)]. This association was not confounded by age, sex, ethnicity or deprivation.
Conclusions: smokers in rural areas are less likely to use the New Zealand Quitline, even after controlling for confounding factors. This suggests that the national quitline is less effective in reaching rural smokers and more attention to the promotion of smoking cessation in rural communities is needed
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 8 December 2014
Published date: 19 December 2014
Organisations:
Population, Health & Wellbeing (PHeW)
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 374147
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/374147
PURE UUID: 6ecd907b-f2cb-468f-b8e3-8076580a251b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Feb 2015 12:24
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:27
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Edward Griffin
Author:
Ross Barnet
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics