UK business and environmental strategy: a survey and analysis of east midlands firms' approaches to environmental audit
UK business and environmental strategy: a survey and analysis of east midlands firms' approaches to environmental audit
Uses a questionnaire survey of firms in the East Midlands region of England to examine business attitudes towards environmental protection and the most effective means of motivating firms to be more environmentally responsible; indicates that over one-third of the 129 responding firms use environmental audits (though on further examination this is revealed to be only 12%). Finds that larger firms tend to use environmental audits/reviews, with the energy sector the most prominent; suggests that the smaller the firm, the lower the perception of the effects of environmental legislation, and that the greatest motivation for conducting audits/reviews comes from a single manager's initiative (far more so than legal requirement). Identifies why firms do not use reviews and what the main benefits of doing so are, e.g. improved image; implies that legislation does not promote the benefits to businesses and that advisory action by public agencies may be more appropriate
environment, environmental audit, legislation, management, small firms
30-48
Elliott, D.
5cf40a9d-be42-499c-831a-b4e2db354af9
Patton, D.
a848e8c1-0f1e-4c7d-bad0-97f2b7f13522
1996
Elliott, D.
5cf40a9d-be42-499c-831a-b4e2db354af9
Patton, D.
a848e8c1-0f1e-4c7d-bad0-97f2b7f13522
Elliott, D. and Patton, D.
(1996)
UK business and environmental strategy: a survey and analysis of east midlands firms' approaches to environmental audit.
Greener Management International, 13, .
Abstract
Uses a questionnaire survey of firms in the East Midlands region of England to examine business attitudes towards environmental protection and the most effective means of motivating firms to be more environmentally responsible; indicates that over one-third of the 129 responding firms use environmental audits (though on further examination this is revealed to be only 12%). Finds that larger firms tend to use environmental audits/reviews, with the energy sector the most prominent; suggests that the smaller the firm, the lower the perception of the effects of environmental legislation, and that the greatest motivation for conducting audits/reviews comes from a single manager's initiative (far more so than legal requirement). Identifies why firms do not use reviews and what the main benefits of doing so are, e.g. improved image; implies that legislation does not promote the benefits to businesses and that advisory action by public agencies may be more appropriate
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1996
Keywords:
environment, environmental audit, legislation, management, small firms
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 37467
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/37467
PURE UUID: a0eb4f78-f160-425e-af42-4033e3dc985c
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 01 May 2007
Last modified: 08 Jan 2022 18:58
Export record
Contributors
Author:
D. Elliott
Author:
D. Patton
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics