TElehealth in CHronic disease: mixed-methods study to develop the TECH conceptual model for intervention design and evaluation
TElehealth in CHronic disease: mixed-methods study to develop the TECH conceptual model for intervention design and evaluation
Objective
To develop a conceptual model for effective use of telehealth in the management of chronic health conditions, and to use this to develop and evaluate an intervention for people with two exemplar conditions: raised cardiovascular disease risk and depression.
Design
The model was based on several strands of evidence: a metareview and realist synthesis of quantitative and qualitative evidence on telehealth for chronic conditions; a qualitative study of patients’ and health professionals’ experience of telehealth; a quantitative survey of patients’ interest in using telehealth; and review of existing models of chronic condition management and evidence-based treatment guidelines. Based on these evidence strands, a model was developed and then refined at a stakeholder workshop. Then a telehealth intervention (‘Healthlines’) was designed by incorporating strategies to address each of the model components. The model also provided a framework for evaluation of this intervention within parallel randomised controlled trials in the two exemplar conditions, and the accompanying process evaluations and economic evaluations.
Setting
Primary care.
Results
The TElehealth in CHronic Disease (TECH) model proposes that attention to four components will offer interventions the best chance of success: (1) engagement of patients and health professionals, (2) effective chronic disease management (including subcomponents of self-management, optimisation of treatment, care coordination), (3) partnership between providers and (4) patient, social and health system context. Key intended outcomes are improved health, access to care, patient experience and cost-effective care.
Conclusions
A conceptual model has been developed based on multiple sources of evidence which articulates how telehealth may best provide benefits for patients with chronic health conditions. It can be used to structure the design and evaluation of telehealth programmes which aim to be acceptable to patients and providers, and cost-effective.
Salisbury, Chris
50e9a5a0-c074-4af8-9b1b-e1e8408aae3c
Thomas, Clare
e19a162f-a388-4df2-9a37-910406714cd3
O'Cathain, Alicia
2fa113fb-2028-4cfb-84e2-2c2fdacce907
Rogers, Anne
105eeebc-1899-4850-950e-385a51738eb7
Pope, Catherine
21ae1290-0838-4245-adcf-6f901a0d4607
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Hollinghurst, Sandra
e0ec6e20-afca-437a-a2e1-4250ea157811
Fahey, Tom
c0fd145a-af82-4c37-bce0-1c2e3e30c0f9
Lewis, Glyn
11aed8f6-3905-455e-8e89-34147a5e5d26
Large, Shirley
b57b273c-d3b9-4ab7-9e94-00274c3b5ec4
Edwards, Louisa
a40e5b87-fc38-42db-9b59-bc00c5d64271
Rowsell, Alison
058f3917-b556-4eef-a393-4c025a3c4ccb
Segar, Julia
bc313b40-880e-481a-aaa8-e1d5792d58fe
Brownsell, Simon
4bee2509-ff0d-48a0-aa92-3036e4d3e5b3
Montgomery, Alan A.
e77da73e-70cc-4d5c-acc2-05e3b6ab31c1
6 February 2015
Salisbury, Chris
50e9a5a0-c074-4af8-9b1b-e1e8408aae3c
Thomas, Clare
e19a162f-a388-4df2-9a37-910406714cd3
O'Cathain, Alicia
2fa113fb-2028-4cfb-84e2-2c2fdacce907
Rogers, Anne
105eeebc-1899-4850-950e-385a51738eb7
Pope, Catherine
21ae1290-0838-4245-adcf-6f901a0d4607
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Hollinghurst, Sandra
e0ec6e20-afca-437a-a2e1-4250ea157811
Fahey, Tom
c0fd145a-af82-4c37-bce0-1c2e3e30c0f9
Lewis, Glyn
11aed8f6-3905-455e-8e89-34147a5e5d26
Large, Shirley
b57b273c-d3b9-4ab7-9e94-00274c3b5ec4
Edwards, Louisa
a40e5b87-fc38-42db-9b59-bc00c5d64271
Rowsell, Alison
058f3917-b556-4eef-a393-4c025a3c4ccb
Segar, Julia
bc313b40-880e-481a-aaa8-e1d5792d58fe
Brownsell, Simon
4bee2509-ff0d-48a0-aa92-3036e4d3e5b3
Montgomery, Alan A.
e77da73e-70cc-4d5c-acc2-05e3b6ab31c1
Salisbury, Chris, Thomas, Clare, O'Cathain, Alicia, Rogers, Anne, Pope, Catherine, Yardley, Lucy, Hollinghurst, Sandra, Fahey, Tom, Lewis, Glyn, Large, Shirley, Edwards, Louisa, Rowsell, Alison, Segar, Julia, Brownsell, Simon and Montgomery, Alan A.
(2015)
TElehealth in CHronic disease: mixed-methods study to develop the TECH conceptual model for intervention design and evaluation.
BMJ Open, 5 (2), [e006448].
(doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006448).
(PMID:25659890)
Abstract
Objective
To develop a conceptual model for effective use of telehealth in the management of chronic health conditions, and to use this to develop and evaluate an intervention for people with two exemplar conditions: raised cardiovascular disease risk and depression.
Design
The model was based on several strands of evidence: a metareview and realist synthesis of quantitative and qualitative evidence on telehealth for chronic conditions; a qualitative study of patients’ and health professionals’ experience of telehealth; a quantitative survey of patients’ interest in using telehealth; and review of existing models of chronic condition management and evidence-based treatment guidelines. Based on these evidence strands, a model was developed and then refined at a stakeholder workshop. Then a telehealth intervention (‘Healthlines’) was designed by incorporating strategies to address each of the model components. The model also provided a framework for evaluation of this intervention within parallel randomised controlled trials in the two exemplar conditions, and the accompanying process evaluations and economic evaluations.
Setting
Primary care.
Results
The TElehealth in CHronic Disease (TECH) model proposes that attention to four components will offer interventions the best chance of success: (1) engagement of patients and health professionals, (2) effective chronic disease management (including subcomponents of self-management, optimisation of treatment, care coordination), (3) partnership between providers and (4) patient, social and health system context. Key intended outcomes are improved health, access to care, patient experience and cost-effective care.
Conclusions
A conceptual model has been developed based on multiple sources of evidence which articulates how telehealth may best provide benefits for patients with chronic health conditions. It can be used to structure the design and evaluation of telehealth programmes which aim to be acceptable to patients and providers, and cost-effective.
Text
e006448.full.pdf
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 9 January 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 6 February 2015
Published date: 6 February 2015
Organisations:
Faculty of Health Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 375101
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/375101
PURE UUID: b06c4213-5908-42ca-b090-37ef68b63a05
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 08 Jul 2015 13:50
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:00
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Chris Salisbury
Author:
Clare Thomas
Author:
Alicia O'Cathain
Author:
Catherine Pope
Author:
Sandra Hollinghurst
Author:
Tom Fahey
Author:
Glyn Lewis
Author:
Shirley Large
Author:
Louisa Edwards
Author:
Julia Segar
Author:
Simon Brownsell
Author:
Alan A. Montgomery
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics