ELF researchers take issue with ‘English as a lingua franca: an immanent critique’
ELF researchers take issue with ‘English as a lingua franca: an immanent critique’
ELF (English as a lingua franca) as a field of inquiry has attracted a great deal of controversy since its beginning: so critiques and responses to those critiques have been a key part of its development. The reasons for this are multiple,but it is perhaps not surprising given ELF’s position, as Cook (2012) puts it, as ‘the disobedient child of two rather reactionary academic parents, variationist sociolinguistics ... and EFL pedagogic theory’ (2012: 244), and the opposition to many established conventions that such a position entails. O’Regan’s (2014) article thus represents a long tradition of critiques of ELF, which are too numerous to mention here, although it is worth pointing out that the better informed ones are rather less uniformly unconstructive than O’Regan’s. In this brief response(for a more detailed discussion see Jenkins and Baker in press), we will focus on just two of the many misinterpretations of ELF in O’Regan’s article: the portrayal of ELF as a static homogeneous field of inquiry, and the claim that ELF researchers have been unconcerned with ideological issues.
121-123
Baker, Will
9f1b758c-e6e0-43ca-b7bf-a0d5e1387d10
Jenkins, Jennifer
7daf0457-86d0-4c08-af4b-79641d1f7fd0
Baird, Robert
42b17178-829b-4360-a5ba-85851315a02f
26 June 2015
Baker, Will
9f1b758c-e6e0-43ca-b7bf-a0d5e1387d10
Jenkins, Jennifer
7daf0457-86d0-4c08-af4b-79641d1f7fd0
Baird, Robert
42b17178-829b-4360-a5ba-85851315a02f
Baker, Will, Jenkins, Jennifer and Baird, Robert
(2015)
ELF researchers take issue with ‘English as a lingua franca: an immanent critique’.
Applied Linguistics, 36 (1), .
(doi:10.1093/applin/amu038).
Abstract
ELF (English as a lingua franca) as a field of inquiry has attracted a great deal of controversy since its beginning: so critiques and responses to those critiques have been a key part of its development. The reasons for this are multiple,but it is perhaps not surprising given ELF’s position, as Cook (2012) puts it, as ‘the disobedient child of two rather reactionary academic parents, variationist sociolinguistics ... and EFL pedagogic theory’ (2012: 244), and the opposition to many established conventions that such a position entails. O’Regan’s (2014) article thus represents a long tradition of critiques of ELF, which are too numerous to mention here, although it is worth pointing out that the better informed ones are rather less uniformly unconstructive than O’Regan’s. In this brief response(for a more detailed discussion see Jenkins and Baker in press), we will focus on just two of the many misinterpretations of ELF in O’Regan’s article: the portrayal of ELF as a static homogeneous field of inquiry, and the claim that ELF researchers have been unconcerned with ideological issues.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 26 June 2015
Organisations:
Modern Languages
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 375302
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/375302
ISSN: 0142-6001
PURE UUID: 61427b5c-a822-4acb-8186-4506c80394f2
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 23 Mar 2015 10:09
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:29
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics