New frontiers in QLR: definition, design and display
New frontiers in QLR: definition, design and display
Research that is attentive to temporal processes and durational phenomena is an important tradition within the social sciences internationally with distinct disciplinary trajectories. Qualitative longitudinal research emerged as a distinct methodological paradigm around the turn of the millennium, named within the UK through journal special issues, literature reviews and funding commitments. In 2012-3 the ESRC National Centre for Research Methods funded a network for methodological innovation to map ’New frontiers of QLR’, bringing together a group of scholars who have been actively involved in establishing QLR as a methodological field. The network provided an opportunity to consolidate the learning that has developed in QLR over a sustained period of investment and to engage critically with what QLR might mean in new times. This paper documents the series of discussions staged by the network involving the definition of QLR, the kinds of relationships and practices it involves and the consequences of these in a changing landscape for social research. The series was deliberately interdisciplinary ensuring that we engaged with the temporal perspectives and norms of different academic and practice traditions and this has both enriched and complicated the picture that has emerged from our deliberations. In this paper we argue that QLR is a methodological paradigm that by definition moves with the times, and is an ongoing site of innovation and experiment. Key issues identified for future development in QLR include: intervening in debates of ‘big data’ with visions of deep data that involve following and connecting cases over time; the potential of longitudinal approaches to reframe the ‘sample’ exploring new ways of connecting the particular and the general; new thinking about research ethics that move us beyond anonymity to better explore the meanings of confidentiality and the co-production of research knowledge; and finally the promotion of a QLR sensibility that involves a heightened awareness of the here and now in the making of knowledge, yet which also connects research biographically over a career, enriched by a reflexive understanding of time as a resource in the making of meaning
National Centre for Research Methods, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton
Thomson, Rachel
a9185794-9d19-47e7-baf3-00da370e6ec9
Hadfield, Lucy
40282a57-702c-4c49-9db0-622e053426eb
Holland, Janet
e80f74b2-5288-46bc-b0e6-1e019c5a916a
Henwood, Karen
e9fcb7ad-49e9-488a-89c4-de2cacc2b03b
Moore, Niamh
b8442cd3-99d0-4883-b85e-8e3aa57dbf93
Stanly, Liz
f83826f9-4508-40dc-b4fb-18af49a1b88e
Taylor, Rebecca
5c52e191-4620-4218-8a61-926c62e087c5
2014
Thomson, Rachel
a9185794-9d19-47e7-baf3-00da370e6ec9
Hadfield, Lucy
40282a57-702c-4c49-9db0-622e053426eb
Holland, Janet
e80f74b2-5288-46bc-b0e6-1e019c5a916a
Henwood, Karen
e9fcb7ad-49e9-488a-89c4-de2cacc2b03b
Moore, Niamh
b8442cd3-99d0-4883-b85e-8e3aa57dbf93
Stanly, Liz
f83826f9-4508-40dc-b4fb-18af49a1b88e
Taylor, Rebecca
5c52e191-4620-4218-8a61-926c62e087c5
Thomson, Rachel, Hadfield, Lucy, Holland, Janet, Henwood, Karen, Moore, Niamh, Stanly, Liz and Taylor, Rebecca
(2014)
New frontiers in QLR: definition, design and display
(National Centre for Research Methods Reports)
Southampton, GB.
National Centre for Research Methods, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton
28pp.
Record type:
Monograph
(Project Report)
Abstract
Research that is attentive to temporal processes and durational phenomena is an important tradition within the social sciences internationally with distinct disciplinary trajectories. Qualitative longitudinal research emerged as a distinct methodological paradigm around the turn of the millennium, named within the UK through journal special issues, literature reviews and funding commitments. In 2012-3 the ESRC National Centre for Research Methods funded a network for methodological innovation to map ’New frontiers of QLR’, bringing together a group of scholars who have been actively involved in establishing QLR as a methodological field. The network provided an opportunity to consolidate the learning that has developed in QLR over a sustained period of investment and to engage critically with what QLR might mean in new times. This paper documents the series of discussions staged by the network involving the definition of QLR, the kinds of relationships and practices it involves and the consequences of these in a changing landscape for social research. The series was deliberately interdisciplinary ensuring that we engaged with the temporal perspectives and norms of different academic and practice traditions and this has both enriched and complicated the picture that has emerged from our deliberations. In this paper we argue that QLR is a methodological paradigm that by definition moves with the times, and is an ongoing site of innovation and experiment. Key issues identified for future development in QLR include: intervening in debates of ‘big data’ with visions of deep data that involve following and connecting cases over time; the potential of longitudinal approaches to reframe the ‘sample’ exploring new ways of connecting the particular and the general; new thinking about research ethics that move us beyond anonymity to better explore the meanings of confidentiality and the co-production of research knowledge; and finally the promotion of a QLR sensibility that involves a heightened awareness of the here and now in the making of knowledge, yet which also connects research biographically over a career, enriched by a reflexive understanding of time as a resource in the making of meaning
Text
new_frontiers_in_QLR.pdf
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 2014
Organisations:
Social Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 375308
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/375308
PURE UUID: 276de671-d25c-427a-9ca5-ecd8770c8538
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 19 Mar 2015 11:55
Last modified: 10 Apr 2024 01:50
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Rachel Thomson
Author:
Lucy Hadfield
Author:
Janet Holland
Author:
Karen Henwood
Author:
Niamh Moore
Author:
Liz Stanly
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics