The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Destined for indecision? A critical analysis of waste management practices in England from 1996 to 2013

Destined for indecision? A critical analysis of waste management practices in England from 1996 to 2013
Destined for indecision? A critical analysis of waste management practices in England from 1996 to 2013
European nations are compelled to reduce reliance on landfill as a destination for household waste, and should, in principle, achieve this goal with due recognition of the aims and principles of the waste hierarchy. Past research has predominantly focused on recycling, whilst interactions between changing waste destinies, causes and drivers of household waste management change, and potential consequences for the goal of the waste hierarchy are less well understood. This study analysed Local Authority Collected Waste (LACW) for England, at national, regional and sub-regional level, in terms of the destination of household waste to landfill, incineration and recycling. Information about waste partnerships, waste management infrastructure and collection systems was collected to help identify and explain changes in waste destinies. Since 1996, the proportion of waste landfilled in England has decreased, in tandem with increases in recycling and incineration. At the regional and sub-regional (Local Authority; LA) level, there have been large variations in the relative proportions of waste landfilled, incinerated and recycled or composted. Annual increases in the proportion of household waste incinerated were typically larger than increases in the proportion recycled. The observed changes took place in the context of legal and financial drivers, and the circumstances of individual LAs (e.g. landfill capacity) also explained the changes seen. Where observed, shifts from landfill towards incineration constitute an approach whereby waste management moves up the waste hierarchy as opposed to an attempt to reach the most preferred option(s); in terms of resource efficiency, this practice is sub-optimal. The requirement to supply incinerators with a feedstock over their lifespan reduces the benefits of developing of recycling and waste reduction, although access to incineration infrastructure permits short-term and marked decreases in the proportion of LACW landfilled. We conclude that there is a need for clearer national strategy and co-ordination to inform and guide policy, practice, planning and investment in infrastructure such that waste management can be better aligned with the principles of the circular economy and resource efficiency. If the ongoing stand-off between national political figures and the waste sector continues, England’s waste policy remains destined for indecision.
waste management, landfill, incineration, waste hierarchy, recycling, household waste
0956-053X
266-276
Farmer, T.D.
f5a07c49-d568-413f-958e-7baf02753854
Shaw, P.J.
935dfebf-9fb6-483c-86da-a21dba8c1989
Williams, I.D.
c9d674ac-ee69-4937-ab43-17e716266e22
Farmer, T.D.
f5a07c49-d568-413f-958e-7baf02753854
Shaw, P.J.
935dfebf-9fb6-483c-86da-a21dba8c1989
Williams, I.D.
c9d674ac-ee69-4937-ab43-17e716266e22

Farmer, T.D., Shaw, P.J. and Williams, I.D. (2015) Destined for indecision? A critical analysis of waste management practices in England from 1996 to 2013. Waste Management, 39, 266-276. (doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.02.023).

Record type: Article

Abstract

European nations are compelled to reduce reliance on landfill as a destination for household waste, and should, in principle, achieve this goal with due recognition of the aims and principles of the waste hierarchy. Past research has predominantly focused on recycling, whilst interactions between changing waste destinies, causes and drivers of household waste management change, and potential consequences for the goal of the waste hierarchy are less well understood. This study analysed Local Authority Collected Waste (LACW) for England, at national, regional and sub-regional level, in terms of the destination of household waste to landfill, incineration and recycling. Information about waste partnerships, waste management infrastructure and collection systems was collected to help identify and explain changes in waste destinies. Since 1996, the proportion of waste landfilled in England has decreased, in tandem with increases in recycling and incineration. At the regional and sub-regional (Local Authority; LA) level, there have been large variations in the relative proportions of waste landfilled, incinerated and recycled or composted. Annual increases in the proportion of household waste incinerated were typically larger than increases in the proportion recycled. The observed changes took place in the context of legal and financial drivers, and the circumstances of individual LAs (e.g. landfill capacity) also explained the changes seen. Where observed, shifts from landfill towards incineration constitute an approach whereby waste management moves up the waste hierarchy as opposed to an attempt to reach the most preferred option(s); in terms of resource efficiency, this practice is sub-optimal. The requirement to supply incinerators with a feedstock over their lifespan reduces the benefits of developing of recycling and waste reduction, although access to incineration infrastructure permits short-term and marked decreases in the proportion of LACW landfilled. We conclude that there is a need for clearer national strategy and co-ordination to inform and guide policy, practice, planning and investment in infrastructure such that waste management can be better aligned with the principles of the circular economy and resource efficiency. If the ongoing stand-off between national political figures and the waste sector continues, England’s waste policy remains destined for indecision.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 16 February 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 12 March 2015
Published date: May 2015
Keywords: waste management, landfill, incineration, waste hierarchy, recycling, household waste
Organisations: Centre for Environmental Science

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 376051
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/376051
ISSN: 0956-053X
PURE UUID: 73fa0696-97c4-40c9-9a1a-298f152fd389
ORCID for P.J. Shaw: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0925-5010
ORCID for I.D. Williams: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0121-1219

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Apr 2015 13:45
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:22

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: T.D. Farmer
Author: P.J. Shaw ORCID iD
Author: I.D. Williams ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×