Pull-out response of geogrids after installation
Pull-out response of geogrids after installation
Damage of geosynthetics during installation processes can affect their performance, so they are typically represented in design by applying reduction factors to their tensile strength measured in the laboratory. This paper contributes to better understanding whether this is representative of the pull-out response of geogrids when confined in soil. The effects of installation damage induced in field trials of two extruded geogrids and one composite with a grid structure were studied. Pull-out tests were used to characterize the impact of installation damage on the soil-geosynthetic interface interaction. The coefficients of interaction were analysed to assess the impact of different parameters, including the nominal strength of the geogrids and compaction energy applied. The coefficient of interaction was affected differently by installation, depending on both the geosynthetic and the soil in contact with it. Confinement in a soil with higher friction angle was more effective in mobilising the interface strength, for both undamaged and damaged samples. The type of soil in contact with the geosynthetics was more relevant for the interface strength than the normal stresses applied in the tests. The main lesson learned from this study is that the use of results from tensile strength of damaged materials to estimate the corresponding effects on their pull-out response can lead to very conservative solutions
339-354
Pinho-Lopes, M.
b7e5f7d6-90d8-48cc-b991-0495445fcea4
Paula, A.M.
97f86e03-7a69-436f-b276-63a08c101add
Lopes, M.L.
dca0c06e-aaa8-47df-923f-5fa9973552ba
29 September 2015
Pinho-Lopes, M.
b7e5f7d6-90d8-48cc-b991-0495445fcea4
Paula, A.M.
97f86e03-7a69-436f-b276-63a08c101add
Lopes, M.L.
dca0c06e-aaa8-47df-923f-5fa9973552ba
Pinho-Lopes, M., Paula, A.M. and Lopes, M.L.
(2015)
Pull-out response of geogrids after installation.
Geosynthetics International, 22 (5), .
(doi:10.1680/gein.15.00016).
Abstract
Damage of geosynthetics during installation processes can affect their performance, so they are typically represented in design by applying reduction factors to their tensile strength measured in the laboratory. This paper contributes to better understanding whether this is representative of the pull-out response of geogrids when confined in soil. The effects of installation damage induced in field trials of two extruded geogrids and one composite with a grid structure were studied. Pull-out tests were used to characterize the impact of installation damage on the soil-geosynthetic interface interaction. The coefficients of interaction were analysed to assess the impact of different parameters, including the nominal strength of the geogrids and compaction energy applied. The coefficient of interaction was affected differently by installation, depending on both the geosynthetic and the soil in contact with it. Confinement in a soil with higher friction angle was more effective in mobilising the interface strength, for both undamaged and damaged samples. The type of soil in contact with the geosynthetics was more relevant for the interface strength than the normal stresses applied in the tests. The main lesson learned from this study is that the use of results from tensile strength of damaged materials to estimate the corresponding effects on their pull-out response can lead to very conservative solutions
Text
__soton.ac.uk_ude_PersonalFiles_Users_mpl1c12_mydocuments_02_publicacoes_2015_GI_ID_pullout_04_submission_3_2015_GI_MPL_AMP_MLL_accepted.pdf
- Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 10 April 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 7 August 2015
Published date: 29 September 2015
Organisations:
Infrastructure Group
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 376124
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/376124
ISSN: 1072-6349
PURE UUID: 3a03f3f9-d4a7-43cb-8278-0fc8adadea5d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 24 Apr 2015 11:25
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:46
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
A.M. Paula
Author:
M.L. Lopes
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics