The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials elicited with vibration applied to the teeth

Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials elicited with vibration applied to the teeth
Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials elicited with vibration applied to the teeth
Objectives: This study investigated whether the method for eliciting vibration-induced oVEMPs could be improved by applying vibration directly to the teeth, and how vibration-induced oVEMP responses depend on the duration of the applied vibration.

Methods: In 10 participants, a hand-held shaker was used to present 100-Hz vibration tone pips to the teeth via a customised bite-bar or to other parts of the head. oVEMP potentials were recorded in response to vibration in three orthogonal directions and five stimulus durations (10–180 ms). The oVEMP responses were analysed in terms of the peak latency onset, peak-to-peak amplitude, and the quality of the trace.

Results: Vibration applied to the teeth via the bite-bar produced oVEMPs that were more consistent, of higher quality and of greater amplitude than those evoked by vibration applied to the head. Longer duration stimuli produced longer duration oVEMP responses. One cycle duration stimuli produced responses that were smaller in amplitude and lower quality than the longer stimulus durations.

Conclusions: Application of vibration via the teeth using a bite-bar is an effective means of producing oVEMPs. A 1-cycle stimulus is not optimal to evoke an oVEMP because it produces less robust responses than those of longer stimulus duration. A positive relationship between the duration of the stimulus and the response is consistent with the notion that the vibration-induced oVEMP is an oscillatory response to the motion of the head, rather than being a simple reflex response that occurs when the stimulus exceeds a threshold level of stimulation.

Significance Applying acceleration to the teeth through a bite-bar elicits clearer oVEMP responses than direct application to other parts of the head and has potential to improve clinical measurements. A 100-Hz 1-cycle stimulus produces less robust oVEMP responses than longer 100-Hz stimuli
vestibular, otolith, vestibular evoked potentials, ovemp, vibration
Parker-George, Jennifer C.
08db544c-2af6-4c12-9d9a-34a4b66d62f5
Bell, Steven L.
91de0801-d2b7-44ba-8e8e-523e672aed8a
Griffin, Michael J.
24112494-9774-40cb-91b7-5b4afe3c41b8
Parker-George, Jennifer C.
08db544c-2af6-4c12-9d9a-34a4b66d62f5
Bell, Steven L.
91de0801-d2b7-44ba-8e8e-523e672aed8a
Griffin, Michael J.
24112494-9774-40cb-91b7-5b4afe3c41b8

Parker-George, Jennifer C., Bell, Steven L. and Griffin, Michael J. (2015) Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials elicited with vibration applied to the teeth. Clinical Neurophysiology. (doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.007). (PMID:25881783)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: This study investigated whether the method for eliciting vibration-induced oVEMPs could be improved by applying vibration directly to the teeth, and how vibration-induced oVEMP responses depend on the duration of the applied vibration.

Methods: In 10 participants, a hand-held shaker was used to present 100-Hz vibration tone pips to the teeth via a customised bite-bar or to other parts of the head. oVEMP potentials were recorded in response to vibration in three orthogonal directions and five stimulus durations (10–180 ms). The oVEMP responses were analysed in terms of the peak latency onset, peak-to-peak amplitude, and the quality of the trace.

Results: Vibration applied to the teeth via the bite-bar produced oVEMPs that were more consistent, of higher quality and of greater amplitude than those evoked by vibration applied to the head. Longer duration stimuli produced longer duration oVEMP responses. One cycle duration stimuli produced responses that were smaller in amplitude and lower quality than the longer stimulus durations.

Conclusions: Application of vibration via the teeth using a bite-bar is an effective means of producing oVEMPs. A 1-cycle stimulus is not optimal to evoke an oVEMP because it produces less robust responses than those of longer stimulus duration. A positive relationship between the duration of the stimulus and the response is consistent with the notion that the vibration-induced oVEMP is an oscillatory response to the motion of the head, rather than being a simple reflex response that occurs when the stimulus exceeds a threshold level of stimulation.

Significance Applying acceleration to the teeth through a bite-bar elicits clearer oVEMP responses than direct application to other parts of the head and has potential to improve clinical measurements. A 100-Hz 1-cycle stimulus produces less robust oVEMP responses than longer 100-Hz stimuli

Text
1-s2.0-S138824571500111X-main.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 17 February 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 28 February 2015
Keywords: vestibular, otolith, vestibular evoked potentials, ovemp, vibration
Organisations: Inst. Sound & Vibration Research

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 376447
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/376447
PURE UUID: ad31cd5d-92ea-43f1-acfa-370af406dbd7
ORCID for Michael J. Griffin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0743-9502

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Apr 2015 10:26
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 19:42

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jennifer C. Parker-George
Author: Steven L. Bell
Author: Michael J. Griffin ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×