The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A comparative analysis of vertical and horizontal fixation disparity in sentence reading

A comparative analysis of vertical and horizontal fixation disparity in sentence reading
A comparative analysis of vertical and horizontal fixation disparity in sentence reading
Humans have two, frontally placed eyes and during reading oculomotor and sensory processes are needed to combine the two inputs into a unified percept of the text. Generally, slight vergence errors, i.e., fixation disparities, occur but do not cause double vision since disparate retinal inputs fall into Panum’s fusional area, that is, a range of disparity wherein sensory fusion of the two retinal images is achieved. In this study, we report benchmark data with respect to the mean magnitude and range of vertical compared to horizontal fixation disparities for natural reading. Our data clearly fit to an elliptical pattern of Panum’s fusional area that corresponds with theoretical estimates. Furthermore, when we examined disparity-driven vergence adjustments during fixations by comparing monocular with binocular reading conditions, we found that only horizontal fixation disparities increased significantly under conditions of monocular stimulation. Also, no significant vertical fine-tuning (vergence adjustment) was observed for vergence eye movements during reading fixations. Thus, horizontal and vertical fixation disparities and vergence adjustments during reading showed quite different characteristics, and this dissociation is directly related to the functional role of vergence adjustments: vertical fusion – and vertical vergence – subserve the maintenance of a single percept and stereopsis by keeping the eyes in register and allowing for horizontal fusional processes to successfully operate over a vertically aligned input. A reliable and stable vertical alignment is, thus, a pre-requisite over which horizontal fusional responses (and depth perception) can work most efficiently – even in a task like reading.
fixation disparity, vergence, reading, binocular fusion, binocular coordination
0042-6989
118-127
Jainta, S.
9a366c28-3194-46aa-8f94-d2085ee5fb72
Blythe, Hazel I.
51835633-e40b-4e8b-ae49-ad6b2f927f4c
Nikolova, M.
3239f860-0285-499c-a6bd-a4532c1a0b54
Jones, M.O.
8ca656ec-ae63-482d-b20a-144cab012648
Liversedge, Simon P.
3ebda3f3-d930-4f89-85d5-5654d8fe7dee
Jainta, S.
9a366c28-3194-46aa-8f94-d2085ee5fb72
Blythe, Hazel I.
51835633-e40b-4e8b-ae49-ad6b2f927f4c
Nikolova, M.
3239f860-0285-499c-a6bd-a4532c1a0b54
Jones, M.O.
8ca656ec-ae63-482d-b20a-144cab012648
Liversedge, Simon P.
3ebda3f3-d930-4f89-85d5-5654d8fe7dee

Jainta, S., Blythe, Hazel I., Nikolova, M., Jones, M.O. and Liversedge, Simon P. (2015) A comparative analysis of vertical and horizontal fixation disparity in sentence reading. Vision Research, 110, part A, 118-127. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2015.03.008). (PMID:25839421)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Humans have two, frontally placed eyes and during reading oculomotor and sensory processes are needed to combine the two inputs into a unified percept of the text. Generally, slight vergence errors, i.e., fixation disparities, occur but do not cause double vision since disparate retinal inputs fall into Panum’s fusional area, that is, a range of disparity wherein sensory fusion of the two retinal images is achieved. In this study, we report benchmark data with respect to the mean magnitude and range of vertical compared to horizontal fixation disparities for natural reading. Our data clearly fit to an elliptical pattern of Panum’s fusional area that corresponds with theoretical estimates. Furthermore, when we examined disparity-driven vergence adjustments during fixations by comparing monocular with binocular reading conditions, we found that only horizontal fixation disparities increased significantly under conditions of monocular stimulation. Also, no significant vertical fine-tuning (vergence adjustment) was observed for vergence eye movements during reading fixations. Thus, horizontal and vertical fixation disparities and vergence adjustments during reading showed quite different characteristics, and this dissociation is directly related to the functional role of vergence adjustments: vertical fusion – and vertical vergence – subserve the maintenance of a single percept and stereopsis by keeping the eyes in register and allowing for horizontal fusional processes to successfully operate over a vertically aligned input. A reliable and stable vertical alignment is, thus, a pre-requisite over which horizontal fusional responses (and depth perception) can work most efficiently – even in a task like reading.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 1 April 2015
Published date: May 2015
Keywords: fixation disparity, vergence, reading, binocular fusion, binocular coordination

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 376481
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/376481
ISSN: 0042-6989
PURE UUID: c6580517-007d-42f9-aaa5-42a622685183

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Apr 2015 09:04
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 19:44

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: S. Jainta
Author: Hazel I. Blythe
Author: M. Nikolova
Author: M.O. Jones
Author: Simon P. Liversedge

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×