The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Understanding and exploring people’s food beliefs to design healthy eating applications

Understanding and exploring people’s food beliefs to design healthy eating applications
Understanding and exploring people’s food beliefs to design healthy eating applications
Wellness is a domain of growing interest in computing. Many interventions are designed to modify people’s behavior to make them healthy. But often, they ignore people’s beliefs and socioeconomic context so no sustained change are achieved. This thesis, therefore, focuses on rethinking how we can leverage people’s food beliefs to design healthy eating systems that can achieve sustained change.

The thesis begins with a literature review on why healthy eating is complex and how it depends on various contexts including people’s food beliefs. Then we reflect upon current design notion of healthy eating applications and acknowledge the current designs can not address all the complex of healthy eating. Thus, we should explore the alternative design notion, which tries to leverage what people think about food.

A study on diet-related topics and social interaction patterns on forums led us to the idea that crowd’s wisdom on food’s healthiness could help people to better understand food and potentially encourage them to change eating behavior. Thus, we designed and evaluated one early prototype that allows people to judge each other’s food’s healthiness by giving ratings and checking 5 predefined heuristics. The outcome of this prototype study confirmed that people like the idea of expressing own thoughts about food and like to have others’ thoughts to validate owns. We further explored exactly what kinds of food beliefs people hold via a survey study with real food pictures. And we found 8 categories of food beliefs and also validated that even experts can not reach consensus on food’s healthiness and thus there is clearly a gap between what we know from nutrition literature and how interventions are actually designed. To further leverage people’s food beliefs, we need to first capture it. We developed three simple UIs to capture such food beliefs, and evaluated the UIs from three different perspectives. We also found two patterns from the data we collect which can help us better visualize the data and identify group of people. In the end of the thesis, we discuss the thesis work and present the future works.
Gao, Feng
b0ec9214-2c52-4660-9beb-a0ed2e5f2ad0
Gao, Feng
b0ec9214-2c52-4660-9beb-a0ed2e5f2ad0
schraefel, m.c.
ac304659-1692-47f6-b892-15113b8c929f

Gao, Feng (2014) Understanding and exploring people’s food beliefs to design healthy eating applications. University of Southampton, Physical Sciences and Engineering, Doctoral Thesis, 130pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Wellness is a domain of growing interest in computing. Many interventions are designed to modify people’s behavior to make them healthy. But often, they ignore people’s beliefs and socioeconomic context so no sustained change are achieved. This thesis, therefore, focuses on rethinking how we can leverage people’s food beliefs to design healthy eating systems that can achieve sustained change.

The thesis begins with a literature review on why healthy eating is complex and how it depends on various contexts including people’s food beliefs. Then we reflect upon current design notion of healthy eating applications and acknowledge the current designs can not address all the complex of healthy eating. Thus, we should explore the alternative design notion, which tries to leverage what people think about food.

A study on diet-related topics and social interaction patterns on forums led us to the idea that crowd’s wisdom on food’s healthiness could help people to better understand food and potentially encourage them to change eating behavior. Thus, we designed and evaluated one early prototype that allows people to judge each other’s food’s healthiness by giving ratings and checking 5 predefined heuristics. The outcome of this prototype study confirmed that people like the idea of expressing own thoughts about food and like to have others’ thoughts to validate owns. We further explored exactly what kinds of food beliefs people hold via a survey study with real food pictures. And we found 8 categories of food beliefs and also validated that even experts can not reach consensus on food’s healthiness and thus there is clearly a gap between what we know from nutrition literature and how interventions are actually designed. To further leverage people’s food beliefs, we need to first capture it. We developed three simple UIs to capture such food beliefs, and evaluated the UIs from three different perspectives. We also found two patterns from the data we collect which can help us better visualize the data and identify group of people. In the end of the thesis, we discuss the thesis work and present the future works.

Text
__soton.ac.uk_ude_personalfiles_users_jo1d13_mydesktop_Feng_PhD_Thesis_Corrected.pdf - Other
Download (4MB)

More information

Published date: January 2014
Organisations: University of Southampton, Agents, Interactions & Complexity

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 376522
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/376522
PURE UUID: e675349b-a09e-4899-b781-be916d9d4526
ORCID for m.c. schraefel: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9061-7957

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Jul 2015 14:53
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:16

Export record

Contributors

Author: Feng Gao
Thesis advisor: m.c. schraefel ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×