Who are we trying to impress? Reflections in navigating political science, ethnography and interpretation
Who are we trying to impress? Reflections in navigating political science, ethnography and interpretation
Purpose
– Turning laborious ethnographic research into stylized argumentative prose for academic consumption is a painstaking craft. The purpose of this paper is to revisit this perennial issue, and extend a claim the authors have made elsewhere about the inevitably impressionistic, rather than the oft-claimed “systematic”, nature of this task.
Design/methodology/approach
– The authors draw and reflect on their own experiences of conducting and navigating across political science, ethnography and interpretation in order to justify and uphold the benefits of impressionism.
Findings
– The authors argue that the impressionistic account of writing up fieldwork has important implications for these diverse disciplinary terrains.
Originality/value
– The authors develop an argument as to how and why an appreciation of this craft’s impressionistic nature can affect how the authors go about creating, evaluating and ultimately thinking about ethnographic research in foreign disciplines like political science.
223-235
Boswell, John
34bad0df-3d4d-40ce-948f-65871e3d783c
Corbett, Jack
ad651655-ac70-4072-a36f-92165e296ce2
Boswell, John
34bad0df-3d4d-40ce-948f-65871e3d783c
Corbett, Jack
ad651655-ac70-4072-a36f-92165e296ce2
Boswell, John and Corbett, Jack
(2015)
Who are we trying to impress? Reflections in navigating political science, ethnography and interpretation.
Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 4 (2), .
(doi:10.1108/JOE-08-2014-0030).
(In Press)
Abstract
Purpose
– Turning laborious ethnographic research into stylized argumentative prose for academic consumption is a painstaking craft. The purpose of this paper is to revisit this perennial issue, and extend a claim the authors have made elsewhere about the inevitably impressionistic, rather than the oft-claimed “systematic”, nature of this task.
Design/methodology/approach
– The authors draw and reflect on their own experiences of conducting and navigating across political science, ethnography and interpretation in order to justify and uphold the benefits of impressionism.
Findings
– The authors argue that the impressionistic account of writing up fieldwork has important implications for these diverse disciplinary terrains.
Originality/value
– The authors develop an argument as to how and why an appreciation of this craft’s impressionistic nature can affect how the authors go about creating, evaluating and ultimately thinking about ethnographic research in foreign disciplines like political science.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 10 March 2015
Organisations:
Politics & International Relations
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 376592
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/376592
ISSN: 2046-6749
PURE UUID: 85d01a26-2b24-4dc4-90a0-56dbb2c45682
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 May 2015 13:40
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:48
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics