Romalpa and contractual innovation
Romalpa and contractual innovation
Socio‐legal studies have given relatively little attention to the mechanisms by which change occurs to the boilerplate that constitute modern contracts. Contrary to the impression left by neo‐classical contract theory (and its descendant, Chicago School law and economics), contracts are not routinely revised to provide an optimal solution. As recent empirical studies show, change is sporadic, even within high‐value contracts drafted by expert practitioners. Improvements to contractual form only arise after some external shock, which reveals the weakness in the prior norm. In the first application of this principle within the United Kingdom, the article considers the reputed rapid change in ‘retention of title’ clauses in sales transactions in the mid‐1970s, and identifies the factors, and personalities, that led to such rapid legal innovation and change.
358-386
Davey, James
6fe8c2ef-5959-4877-94a5-a55098975daa
Kelly, Cliona
61ebc398-c655-46fd-b49c-88337e91d540
1 September 2015
Davey, James
6fe8c2ef-5959-4877-94a5-a55098975daa
Kelly, Cliona
61ebc398-c655-46fd-b49c-88337e91d540
Abstract
Socio‐legal studies have given relatively little attention to the mechanisms by which change occurs to the boilerplate that constitute modern contracts. Contrary to the impression left by neo‐classical contract theory (and its descendant, Chicago School law and economics), contracts are not routinely revised to provide an optimal solution. As recent empirical studies show, change is sporadic, even within high‐value contracts drafted by expert practitioners. Improvements to contractual form only arise after some external shock, which reveals the weakness in the prior norm. In the first application of this principle within the United Kingdom, the article considers the reputed rapid change in ‘retention of title’ clauses in sales transactions in the mid‐1970s, and identifies the factors, and personalities, that led to such rapid legal innovation and change.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 9 August 2015
Published date: 1 September 2015
Organisations:
Southampton Law School
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 376881
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/376881
ISSN: 1467-6478
PURE UUID: 6e86df05-ba7f-430c-94f8-11b0f8e34559
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 13 May 2015 11:11
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 19:51
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
James Davey
Author:
Cliona Kelly
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics