The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Zusanli (ST36) acupoint injection for preventing postoperative ileus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Zusanli (ST36) acupoint injection for preventing postoperative ileus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
Zusanli (ST36) acupoint injection for preventing postoperative ileus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
Objective

To evaluate the preventive effect of Zusanli (ST36) acupoint injections with various agents, for postoperative ileus (POI).

Methods

We searched electronic databases for randomized controlled trials from inception to 1st February 2015 evaluating ST36 acupoint injection for preventing POI. Revman 5.2.0 was used for data analysis with effect estimates presented as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Statistical heterogeneity was tested using I2 (defined as significant if I2 > 75%). We used a random effects model (REM) for pooling data with significant heterogeneity.

Results

Thirty trials involving 2967 participants were included. All trials were assessed as high risk of bias (poor methodological quality). For time to first flatus, meta-analysis favored ST36 acupoint injection of neostigmine (MD ?20.70 h, 95% CI ?25.53 to ?15.87, 15 trials, I2 = 98%, REM), vitamin B1 (MD ?11.22 h, 95% CI ?17.01 to ?5.43, 5 trials, I2 = 98%, REM), and metoclopramide (MD ?15.65 h, 95% CI ?24.77 to ?6.53, 3 trials, I2 = 94%, REM) compared to usual care alone. Meta-analysis of vitamin B1 favored ST36 acupoint injection compared to intra-muscular injection (MD ?17.21 h, 95% CI ?21.05 to ?13.36, 4 trials, I2 = 89%, REM). Similarly, for time to bowel sounds recovery and first defecation, ST36 acupoint injection also showed positive effects.

Conclusions

ST36 acupoint injections with various agents may have a preventive effect for POI. Safety is inconclusive as few of included trials reported adverse events. Due to the poor methodological quality and likely publication bias further robust clinical trials are required to arrive at a definitive conclusion.
ST36 acupoint injection, postoperative ileus, systematic review, meta-analysis, randomized controlled trial
0965-2299
1-15
Wang, Mei
9adfc07f-7493-45db-a069-be7ac8001ebc
Gao, Yun-Hai
8315b2bd-624d-41e8-bd2e-1434a58b5b60
Xu, Jie
593871b5-a17a-4e0f-ae0e-7e48b1aadd99
Chi, Yuan
ae43123f-234a-41f4-95ab-fd8461c928ff
Wei, Xiao-Bing
940cd1b2-33af-4c32-8e91-43cf85b94c93
Lewith, George
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625
Liu, Jian-Ping
ab58e381-fd47-404c-ba28-9dfc6423002f
Wang, Mei
9adfc07f-7493-45db-a069-be7ac8001ebc
Gao, Yun-Hai
8315b2bd-624d-41e8-bd2e-1434a58b5b60
Xu, Jie
593871b5-a17a-4e0f-ae0e-7e48b1aadd99
Chi, Yuan
ae43123f-234a-41f4-95ab-fd8461c928ff
Wei, Xiao-Bing
940cd1b2-33af-4c32-8e91-43cf85b94c93
Lewith, George
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625
Liu, Jian-Ping
ab58e381-fd47-404c-ba28-9dfc6423002f

Wang, Mei, Gao, Yun-Hai, Xu, Jie, Chi, Yuan, Wei, Xiao-Bing, Lewith, George and Liu, Jian-Ping (2015) Zusanli (ST36) acupoint injection for preventing postoperative ileus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 1-15. (doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.013).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the preventive effect of Zusanli (ST36) acupoint injections with various agents, for postoperative ileus (POI).

Methods

We searched electronic databases for randomized controlled trials from inception to 1st February 2015 evaluating ST36 acupoint injection for preventing POI. Revman 5.2.0 was used for data analysis with effect estimates presented as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Statistical heterogeneity was tested using I2 (defined as significant if I2 > 75%). We used a random effects model (REM) for pooling data with significant heterogeneity.

Results

Thirty trials involving 2967 participants were included. All trials were assessed as high risk of bias (poor methodological quality). For time to first flatus, meta-analysis favored ST36 acupoint injection of neostigmine (MD ?20.70 h, 95% CI ?25.53 to ?15.87, 15 trials, I2 = 98%, REM), vitamin B1 (MD ?11.22 h, 95% CI ?17.01 to ?5.43, 5 trials, I2 = 98%, REM), and metoclopramide (MD ?15.65 h, 95% CI ?24.77 to ?6.53, 3 trials, I2 = 94%, REM) compared to usual care alone. Meta-analysis of vitamin B1 favored ST36 acupoint injection compared to intra-muscular injection (MD ?17.21 h, 95% CI ?21.05 to ?13.36, 4 trials, I2 = 89%, REM). Similarly, for time to bowel sounds recovery and first defecation, ST36 acupoint injection also showed positive effects.

Conclusions

ST36 acupoint injections with various agents may have a preventive effect for POI. Safety is inconclusive as few of included trials reported adverse events. Due to the poor methodological quality and likely publication bias further robust clinical trials are required to arrive at a definitive conclusion.

Text
Wang_Zusanli.pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 31 March 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 13 April 2015
Keywords: ST36 acupoint injection, postoperative ileus, systematic review, meta-analysis, randomized controlled trial
Organisations: Primary Care & Population Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 376920
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/376920
ISSN: 0965-2299
PURE UUID: df46d714-831e-482d-986d-1d0228282b99

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 May 2015 10:48
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 19:52

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Mei Wang
Author: Yun-Hai Gao
Author: Jie Xu
Author: Yuan Chi
Author: Xiao-Bing Wei
Author: George Lewith
Author: Jian-Ping Liu

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×