The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Benefits and costs of ecological restoration: rapid assessment of changing ecosystem service values at a U.K. wetland

Benefits and costs of ecological restoration: rapid assessment of changing ecosystem service values at a U.K. wetland
Benefits and costs of ecological restoration: rapid assessment of changing ecosystem service values at a U.K. wetland
Restoration of degraded land is recognized by the international community as an important way of enhancing both biodiversity and ecosystem services, but more information is needed about its costs and benefits. In Cambridgeshire, U.K., a long-term initiative to convert drained, intensively farmed arable land to a wetland habitat mosaic is driven by a desire both to prevent biodiversity loss from the nationally important Wicken Fen National Nature Reserve (Wicken Fen NNR) and to increase the provision of ecosystem services. We evaluated the changes in ecosystem service delivery resulting from this land conversion, using a new Toolkit for Ecosystem Service Site-based Assessment (TESSA) to estimate biophysical and monetary values of ecosystem services provided by the restored wetland mosaic compared with the former arable land. Overall results suggest that restoration is associated with a net gain to society as a whole of $199 ha(-1)y(-1), for a one-off investment in restoration of $2320 ha(-1). Restoration has led to an estimated loss of arable production of $2040 ha(-1)y(-1), but estimated gains of $671 ha(-1)y(-1) in nature-based recreation, $120 ha(-1)y(-1) from grazing, $48 ha(-1)y(-1) from flood protection, and a reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions worth an estimated $72 ha(-1)y(-1). Management costs have also declined by an estimated $1325 ha(-1)y(-1). Despite uncertainties associated with all measured values and the conservative assumptions used, we conclude that there was a substantial gain to society as a whole from this land-use conversion. The beneficiaries also changed from local arable farmers under arable production to graziers, countryside users from towns and villages, and the global community, under restoration. We emphasize that the values reported here are not necessarily transferable to other sites
3875-3886
Peh, Kelvin S.-H.
0bd60207-dad8-43fb-a84a-a15e09b024cc
Balmford, Andrew
b66d76a7-4e7d-435b-a1b8-2d61883c8166
Field, Rob H.
fd235bed-1130-48e5-9a34-c68e5652ccb6
Lamb, Anthony
d07ae700-b5b3-48a7-afc3-add1786804a3
Birch, Jennifer C.
f6a73593-2728-4676-abba-fbeec35b5a1b
Bradbury, Richard B.
2e24f88e-50ba-4ed7-a22d-208dbeee0cda
Brown, Claire
4afd0961-a921-4a4f-abda-f8ba15b8d585
Butchart, Stuart H.M.
402f033c-e3a7-4c05-920f-97735de39334
Lester, Martin
ce2de4f1-893b-46ee-a372-031aa2d2f7cd
Morrison, Ross
2e0b260c-6355-4286-8329-89cfcb268a93
Sedgwick, Isabel
43fbed75-6564-4ad5-ac84-ea18df95bd33
Soans, Chris
7c47396f-65a3-4124-a274-5dfe634fb589
Stattersfield, Alison J.
7d811d9a-de16-4b73-9ec9-5d9c1b337c2f
Stroh, Peter A.
03e46692-a9da-40ff-946e-6f6e84057a29
Swetnam, Ruth D.
15cac81f-891a-4d4e-898e-6c9bddf25113
Thomas, David H.L.
65c132cb-c6e4-40d8-95ab-813612ebb12d
Walpole, Matt
18af0e2f-32d8-4e78-9f00-bf49eb4e3407
Warrington, Stuart
344a20b2-1d7e-4b5f-8c43-28b176f63439
Hughes, Francine M.R.
cdc633aa-dd4c-4726-abbc-b867004ada78
Peh, Kelvin S.-H.
0bd60207-dad8-43fb-a84a-a15e09b024cc
Balmford, Andrew
b66d76a7-4e7d-435b-a1b8-2d61883c8166
Field, Rob H.
fd235bed-1130-48e5-9a34-c68e5652ccb6
Lamb, Anthony
d07ae700-b5b3-48a7-afc3-add1786804a3
Birch, Jennifer C.
f6a73593-2728-4676-abba-fbeec35b5a1b
Bradbury, Richard B.
2e24f88e-50ba-4ed7-a22d-208dbeee0cda
Brown, Claire
4afd0961-a921-4a4f-abda-f8ba15b8d585
Butchart, Stuart H.M.
402f033c-e3a7-4c05-920f-97735de39334
Lester, Martin
ce2de4f1-893b-46ee-a372-031aa2d2f7cd
Morrison, Ross
2e0b260c-6355-4286-8329-89cfcb268a93
Sedgwick, Isabel
43fbed75-6564-4ad5-ac84-ea18df95bd33
Soans, Chris
7c47396f-65a3-4124-a274-5dfe634fb589
Stattersfield, Alison J.
7d811d9a-de16-4b73-9ec9-5d9c1b337c2f
Stroh, Peter A.
03e46692-a9da-40ff-946e-6f6e84057a29
Swetnam, Ruth D.
15cac81f-891a-4d4e-898e-6c9bddf25113
Thomas, David H.L.
65c132cb-c6e4-40d8-95ab-813612ebb12d
Walpole, Matt
18af0e2f-32d8-4e78-9f00-bf49eb4e3407
Warrington, Stuart
344a20b2-1d7e-4b5f-8c43-28b176f63439
Hughes, Francine M.R.
cdc633aa-dd4c-4726-abbc-b867004ada78

Peh, Kelvin S.-H., Balmford, Andrew, Field, Rob H., Lamb, Anthony, Birch, Jennifer C., Bradbury, Richard B., Brown, Claire, Butchart, Stuart H.M., Lester, Martin, Morrison, Ross, Sedgwick, Isabel, Soans, Chris, Stattersfield, Alison J., Stroh, Peter A., Swetnam, Ruth D., Thomas, David H.L., Walpole, Matt, Warrington, Stuart and Hughes, Francine M.R. (2014) Benefits and costs of ecological restoration: rapid assessment of changing ecosystem service values at a U.K. wetland. Ecology and Evolution, 4 (20), 3875-3886. (doi:10.1002/ece3.1248). (PMID:25505517)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Restoration of degraded land is recognized by the international community as an important way of enhancing both biodiversity and ecosystem services, but more information is needed about its costs and benefits. In Cambridgeshire, U.K., a long-term initiative to convert drained, intensively farmed arable land to a wetland habitat mosaic is driven by a desire both to prevent biodiversity loss from the nationally important Wicken Fen National Nature Reserve (Wicken Fen NNR) and to increase the provision of ecosystem services. We evaluated the changes in ecosystem service delivery resulting from this land conversion, using a new Toolkit for Ecosystem Service Site-based Assessment (TESSA) to estimate biophysical and monetary values of ecosystem services provided by the restored wetland mosaic compared with the former arable land. Overall results suggest that restoration is associated with a net gain to society as a whole of $199 ha(-1)y(-1), for a one-off investment in restoration of $2320 ha(-1). Restoration has led to an estimated loss of arable production of $2040 ha(-1)y(-1), but estimated gains of $671 ha(-1)y(-1) in nature-based recreation, $120 ha(-1)y(-1) from grazing, $48 ha(-1)y(-1) from flood protection, and a reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions worth an estimated $72 ha(-1)y(-1). Management costs have also declined by an estimated $1325 ha(-1)y(-1). Despite uncertainties associated with all measured values and the conservative assumptions used, we conclude that there was a substantial gain to society as a whole from this land-use conversion. The beneficiaries also changed from local arable farmers under arable production to graziers, countryside users from towns and villages, and the global community, under restoration. We emphasize that the values reported here are not necessarily transferable to other sites

Text
ece30004-3875.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (654kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 24 August 2014
e-pub ahead of print date: 23 October 2014
Published date: 27 October 2014
Organisations: Faculty of Natural and Environmental Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 377454
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/377454
PURE UUID: fa9682a2-f1aa-4dbc-b51d-e90ce0811cdc
ORCID for Kelvin S.-H. Peh: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2921-1341

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Jun 2015 10:27
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:44

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Andrew Balmford
Author: Rob H. Field
Author: Anthony Lamb
Author: Jennifer C. Birch
Author: Richard B. Bradbury
Author: Claire Brown
Author: Stuart H.M. Butchart
Author: Martin Lester
Author: Ross Morrison
Author: Isabel Sedgwick
Author: Chris Soans
Author: Alison J. Stattersfield
Author: Peter A. Stroh
Author: Ruth D. Swetnam
Author: David H.L. Thomas
Author: Matt Walpole
Author: Stuart Warrington
Author: Francine M.R. Hughes

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×