What benefits do community forests provide, and to whom? A rapid assessment of ecosystem services from a Himalayan forest, Nepal
What benefits do community forests provide, and to whom? A rapid assessment of ecosystem services from a Himalayan forest, Nepal
In Nepal, community forestry is part of a national strategy for livelihoods improvement and environmental protection. However, analysis of the social, economic and environmental impacts of community forestry is often limited, restricted to a narrow set of benefits (e.g. non-timber forest products) and rarely makes comparisons with alternative land-use options (e.g. agriculture). This study, conducted at Phulchoki Mountain Forest Important Bird and Biodiversity Area (IBA) in the Kathmandu Valley, used methods from the Toolkit for Ecosystem Service Site-based Assessment (TESSA) to compare multiple ecosystem service values (including carbon storage, greenhouse gas sequestration, water provision, water quality, harvested wild goods, cultivated goods and nature-based recreation) provided by the site in its current state and a plausible alternative state in which community forestry had not been implemented. We found that outcomes from community forestry have been favourable for most stakeholders, at most scales, for most services and for important biodiversity at the site. However, not all ecosystem services can be maximised simultaneously, and impacts of land-use decisions on service beneficiaries appear to differ according to socio-economic factors. The policy implications of our findings are discussed in the context of proposals to designate Phulchoki Mountain Forest IBA as part of a Conservation Area.
beneficiaries, biodiversity conservation, community forestry, equity, livelihoods, participatory management
118-127
Birch, Jennifer C.
f6a73593-2728-4676-abba-fbeec35b5a1b
Thapa, Ishana
0c1fe604-0b5f-46b2-b415-251afb2a3c0e
Balmford, Andrew
b66d76a7-4e7d-435b-a1b8-2d61883c8166
Bradbury, Richard B.
2e24f88e-50ba-4ed7-a22d-208dbeee0cda
Brown, Claire
4afd0961-a921-4a4f-abda-f8ba15b8d585
Butchart, Stuart H.M.
402f033c-e3a7-4c05-920f-97735de39334
Gurung, Hum
8e624711-eb0e-497a-b429-d526f09074f9
Hughes, Francine M.R.
cdc633aa-dd4c-4726-abbc-b867004ada78
Mulligan, Mark
0feee227-a3cd-4f80-8723-628ea5d19490
Pandeya, Bhopal
892400ac-af80-40e3-a996-7d2f8634c148
Peh, Kelvin S.-H.
0bd60207-dad8-43fb-a84a-a15e09b024cc
Stattersfield, Alison J.
7d811d9a-de16-4b73-9ec9-5d9c1b337c2f
Walpole, Matt
18af0e2f-32d8-4e78-9f00-bf49eb4e3407
Thomas, David H.L.
65c132cb-c6e4-40d8-95ab-813612ebb12d
June 2014
Birch, Jennifer C.
f6a73593-2728-4676-abba-fbeec35b5a1b
Thapa, Ishana
0c1fe604-0b5f-46b2-b415-251afb2a3c0e
Balmford, Andrew
b66d76a7-4e7d-435b-a1b8-2d61883c8166
Bradbury, Richard B.
2e24f88e-50ba-4ed7-a22d-208dbeee0cda
Brown, Claire
4afd0961-a921-4a4f-abda-f8ba15b8d585
Butchart, Stuart H.M.
402f033c-e3a7-4c05-920f-97735de39334
Gurung, Hum
8e624711-eb0e-497a-b429-d526f09074f9
Hughes, Francine M.R.
cdc633aa-dd4c-4726-abbc-b867004ada78
Mulligan, Mark
0feee227-a3cd-4f80-8723-628ea5d19490
Pandeya, Bhopal
892400ac-af80-40e3-a996-7d2f8634c148
Peh, Kelvin S.-H.
0bd60207-dad8-43fb-a84a-a15e09b024cc
Stattersfield, Alison J.
7d811d9a-de16-4b73-9ec9-5d9c1b337c2f
Walpole, Matt
18af0e2f-32d8-4e78-9f00-bf49eb4e3407
Thomas, David H.L.
65c132cb-c6e4-40d8-95ab-813612ebb12d
Birch, Jennifer C., Thapa, Ishana, Balmford, Andrew, Bradbury, Richard B., Brown, Claire, Butchart, Stuart H.M., Gurung, Hum, Hughes, Francine M.R., Mulligan, Mark, Pandeya, Bhopal, Peh, Kelvin S.-H., Stattersfield, Alison J., Walpole, Matt and Thomas, David H.L.
(2014)
What benefits do community forests provide, and to whom? A rapid assessment of ecosystem services from a Himalayan forest, Nepal.
Ecosystem Services, 8, .
(doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.005).
Abstract
In Nepal, community forestry is part of a national strategy for livelihoods improvement and environmental protection. However, analysis of the social, economic and environmental impacts of community forestry is often limited, restricted to a narrow set of benefits (e.g. non-timber forest products) and rarely makes comparisons with alternative land-use options (e.g. agriculture). This study, conducted at Phulchoki Mountain Forest Important Bird and Biodiversity Area (IBA) in the Kathmandu Valley, used methods from the Toolkit for Ecosystem Service Site-based Assessment (TESSA) to compare multiple ecosystem service values (including carbon storage, greenhouse gas sequestration, water provision, water quality, harvested wild goods, cultivated goods and nature-based recreation) provided by the site in its current state and a plausible alternative state in which community forestry had not been implemented. We found that outcomes from community forestry have been favourable for most stakeholders, at most scales, for most services and for important biodiversity at the site. However, not all ecosystem services can be maximised simultaneously, and impacts of land-use decisions on service beneficiaries appear to differ according to socio-economic factors. The policy implications of our findings are discussed in the context of proposals to designate Phulchoki Mountain Forest IBA as part of a Conservation Area.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 15 March 2014
e-pub ahead of print date: 13 April 2014
Published date: June 2014
Keywords:
beneficiaries, biodiversity conservation, community forestry, equity, livelihoods, participatory management
Organisations:
Environmental
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 377739
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/377739
ISSN: 2212-0416
PURE UUID: d131dba7-4d04-4b9b-b2f5-7ce90355ca3e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 Jun 2015 14:56
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:44
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Jennifer C. Birch
Author:
Ishana Thapa
Author:
Andrew Balmford
Author:
Richard B. Bradbury
Author:
Claire Brown
Author:
Stuart H.M. Butchart
Author:
Hum Gurung
Author:
Francine M.R. Hughes
Author:
Mark Mulligan
Author:
Bhopal Pandeya
Author:
Alison J. Stattersfield
Author:
Matt Walpole
Author:
David H.L. Thomas
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics