Collaborative working within UK NHS secondary care and across sectors for COPD and the impact of peer review: qualitative findings from the UK National COPD Resources and Outcomes Project
Collaborative working within UK NHS secondary care and across sectors for COPD and the impact of peer review: qualitative findings from the UK National COPD Resources and Outcomes Project
Introduction: we investigated the effects on collaborative work within the UK National Health Service (NHS) of an intervention for service quality improvement: informal, structured, reciprocated, multidisciplinary peer review with feedback and action plans. The setting was care for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Theory and methods: we analysed semi-structured interviews with 43 hospital respiratory consultants, nurses and general managers at 24 intervention and 11 control sites, as part of a UK randomised controlled study, the National COPD Resources and Outcomes Project (NCROP), using Scott's conceptual framework for action (inter-organisational, intra-organisational, inter-professional and inter-individual). Three areas of care targeted by NCROP involved collaboration across primary and secondary care.
Results: hospital respiratory department collaborations with commissioners and hospital managers varied. Analysis suggested that this is related to team responses to barriers. Clinicians in unsuccessful collaborations told ‘atrocity stories’ of organisational, structural and professional barriers to service improvement. The others removed barriers by working with government and commissioner agendas to ensure continued involvement in patients' care. Multidisciplinary peer review facilitated collaboration between participants, enabling them to meet, reconcile differences and exchange ideas across boundaries.
Conclusions: the data come from the first randomised controlled trial of organisational peer review, adding to research into UK health service collaborative work, which has had a more restricted focus on inter-professional relations. NCROP peer review may only modestly improve collaboration but these data suggest it might be more effective than top-down exhortations to change when collaboration both across and within organisations is required
e58
Rivas, Carol
040bfbc1-0aef-4826-ab58-e85743fea9d4
Abbott, Stephen
bb811738-777d-4120-a2de-735021cab1f0
Taylor, Stephanie J.C.
62fdb6bf-40a7-4e4b-b705-a96e71dbebbe
Clarke, Aileen
b305d25e-bf08-4344-8aee-f101d3d2df2e
Roberts, C.Michael
946d5f3a-7e31-43b8-85a0-1d51b0867a27
Stone, Robert
99c192c2-1254-4189-9617-5208c20f16d7
Griffiths, Chris
bfeb2c27-a449-4c8c-a922-a774ac95b012
2010
Rivas, Carol
040bfbc1-0aef-4826-ab58-e85743fea9d4
Abbott, Stephen
bb811738-777d-4120-a2de-735021cab1f0
Taylor, Stephanie J.C.
62fdb6bf-40a7-4e4b-b705-a96e71dbebbe
Clarke, Aileen
b305d25e-bf08-4344-8aee-f101d3d2df2e
Roberts, C.Michael
946d5f3a-7e31-43b8-85a0-1d51b0867a27
Stone, Robert
99c192c2-1254-4189-9617-5208c20f16d7
Griffiths, Chris
bfeb2c27-a449-4c8c-a922-a774ac95b012
Rivas, Carol, Abbott, Stephen, Taylor, Stephanie J.C., Clarke, Aileen, Roberts, C.Michael, Stone, Robert and Griffiths, Chris
(2010)
Collaborative working within UK NHS secondary care and across sectors for COPD and the impact of peer review: qualitative findings from the UK National COPD Resources and Outcomes Project.
International Journal of Integrated Care, 10, .
(PMID:20922063)
Abstract
Introduction: we investigated the effects on collaborative work within the UK National Health Service (NHS) of an intervention for service quality improvement: informal, structured, reciprocated, multidisciplinary peer review with feedback and action plans. The setting was care for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Theory and methods: we analysed semi-structured interviews with 43 hospital respiratory consultants, nurses and general managers at 24 intervention and 11 control sites, as part of a UK randomised controlled study, the National COPD Resources and Outcomes Project (NCROP), using Scott's conceptual framework for action (inter-organisational, intra-organisational, inter-professional and inter-individual). Three areas of care targeted by NCROP involved collaboration across primary and secondary care.
Results: hospital respiratory department collaborations with commissioners and hospital managers varied. Analysis suggested that this is related to team responses to barriers. Clinicians in unsuccessful collaborations told ‘atrocity stories’ of organisational, structural and professional barriers to service improvement. The others removed barriers by working with government and commissioner agendas to ensure continued involvement in patients' care. Multidisciplinary peer review facilitated collaboration between participants, enabling them to meet, reconcile differences and exchange ideas across boundaries.
Conclusions: the data come from the first randomised controlled trial of organisational peer review, adding to research into UK health service collaborative work, which has had a more restricted focus on inter-professional relations. NCROP peer review may only modestly improve collaboration but these data suggest it might be more effective than top-down exhortations to change when collaboration both across and within organisations is required
Text
ijic2010-2010058.pdf
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 2010
Organisations:
Faculty of Health Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 378009
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/378009
PURE UUID: d4532382-aae3-48aa-b3b7-eb288d9bb819
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 Jun 2015 15:31
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 20:14
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Carol Rivas
Author:
Stephen Abbott
Author:
Stephanie J.C. Taylor
Author:
Aileen Clarke
Author:
C.Michael Roberts
Author:
Robert Stone
Author:
Chris Griffiths
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics