The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses of appendicitis treatments in children: a systematic review

Outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses of appendicitis treatments in children: a systematic review
Outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses of appendicitis treatments in children: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency in children. Despite this, there is no core outcome set (COS) described for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in children with appendicitis and hence no consensus regarding outcome selection, definition and reporting. We aimed to identify outcomes currently reported in studies of paediatric appendicitis.

METHODS: Using a defined, sensitive search strategy, we identified RCTs and systematic reviews (SRs) of treatment interventions in children with appendicitis. Included studies were all in English and investigated the effect of one or more treatment interventions in children with acute appendicitis or undergoing appendicectomy for presumed acute appendicitis. Studies were reviewed and data extracted by two reviewers. Primary (if defined) and all other outcomes were recorded and assigned to the core areas 'Death', 'Pathophysiological Manifestations', 'Life Impact', 'Resource Use' and 'Adverse Events', using OMERACT Filter 2.0.

RESULTS: A total of 63 studies met the inclusion criteria reporting outcomes from 51 RCTs and nine SRs. Only 25 RCTs and four SRs defined a primary outcome. A total of 115 unique and different outcomes were identified. RCTs reported a median of nine outcomes each (range 1 to 14). The most frequently reported outcomes were wound infection (43 RCTs, nine SRs), intra-peritoneal abscess (41 RCTs, seven SRs) and length of stay (35 RCTs, six SRs) yet all three were reported in just 25 RCTs and five SRs. Common outcomes had multiple different definitions or were frequently not defined. Although outcomes were reported within all core areas, just one RCT and no SR reported outcomes for all core areas. Outcomes assigned to the 'Death' and 'Life Impact' core areas were reported least frequently (in six and 15 RCTs respectively).

CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide heterogeneity in the selection and definition of outcomes in paediatric appendicitis, and little overlap in outcomes used across studies. A paucity of studies report patient relevant outcomes within the 'Life Impact' core area. These factors preclude meaningful evidence synthesis, and pose challenges to designing prospective clinical trials and cohort studies. The development of a COS for paediatric appendicitis is warranted.
1745-6215
1-14
Hall, Nigel J.
6919e8af-3890-42c1-98a7-c110791957cf
Kapadia, Mufiza Z.
c71190ef-13a3-4cb1-b0f3-7041cb6c049e
Eaton, Simon
e14103c2-c06a-45e6-87fe-2358a3371283
Chan, Winnie W.Y.
bd70efa9-27ef-4d45-b801-1c75eafd0f4f
Nickel, Cheri
26420e78-fdb4-4843-a1f4-90976b838163
Pierro, Agostino
74bd6b37-4305-47fd-847d-c19a08718997
Offringa, Martin
f310b471-c45d-40e9-aeb0-a43ce45e84d9
Hall, Nigel J.
6919e8af-3890-42c1-98a7-c110791957cf
Kapadia, Mufiza Z.
c71190ef-13a3-4cb1-b0f3-7041cb6c049e
Eaton, Simon
e14103c2-c06a-45e6-87fe-2358a3371283
Chan, Winnie W.Y.
bd70efa9-27ef-4d45-b801-1c75eafd0f4f
Nickel, Cheri
26420e78-fdb4-4843-a1f4-90976b838163
Pierro, Agostino
74bd6b37-4305-47fd-847d-c19a08718997
Offringa, Martin
f310b471-c45d-40e9-aeb0-a43ce45e84d9

Hall, Nigel J., Kapadia, Mufiza Z., Eaton, Simon, Chan, Winnie W.Y., Nickel, Cheri, Pierro, Agostino and Offringa, Martin (2015) Outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses of appendicitis treatments in children: a systematic review. Trials, 16, 1-14, [275]. (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0783-1). (PMID:26081254)

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency in children. Despite this, there is no core outcome set (COS) described for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in children with appendicitis and hence no consensus regarding outcome selection, definition and reporting. We aimed to identify outcomes currently reported in studies of paediatric appendicitis.

METHODS: Using a defined, sensitive search strategy, we identified RCTs and systematic reviews (SRs) of treatment interventions in children with appendicitis. Included studies were all in English and investigated the effect of one or more treatment interventions in children with acute appendicitis or undergoing appendicectomy for presumed acute appendicitis. Studies were reviewed and data extracted by two reviewers. Primary (if defined) and all other outcomes were recorded and assigned to the core areas 'Death', 'Pathophysiological Manifestations', 'Life Impact', 'Resource Use' and 'Adverse Events', using OMERACT Filter 2.0.

RESULTS: A total of 63 studies met the inclusion criteria reporting outcomes from 51 RCTs and nine SRs. Only 25 RCTs and four SRs defined a primary outcome. A total of 115 unique and different outcomes were identified. RCTs reported a median of nine outcomes each (range 1 to 14). The most frequently reported outcomes were wound infection (43 RCTs, nine SRs), intra-peritoneal abscess (41 RCTs, seven SRs) and length of stay (35 RCTs, six SRs) yet all three were reported in just 25 RCTs and five SRs. Common outcomes had multiple different definitions or were frequently not defined. Although outcomes were reported within all core areas, just one RCT and no SR reported outcomes for all core areas. Outcomes assigned to the 'Death' and 'Life Impact' core areas were reported least frequently (in six and 15 RCTs respectively).

CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide heterogeneity in the selection and definition of outcomes in paediatric appendicitis, and little overlap in outcomes used across studies. A paucity of studies report patient relevant outcomes within the 'Life Impact' core area. These factors preclude meaningful evidence synthesis, and pose challenges to designing prospective clinical trials and cohort studies. The development of a COS for paediatric appendicitis is warranted.

Text
Outcomes measures systematic review Trials 2015.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (2MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 28 May 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 17 June 2015
Published date: 17 June 2015
Organisations: Human Development & Health

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 378443
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/378443
ISSN: 1745-6215
PURE UUID: d7bb4530-86f5-44b9-8123-81aa4dba5675
ORCID for Nigel J. Hall: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8570-9374

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Jul 2015 16:15
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:38

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Nigel J. Hall ORCID iD
Author: Mufiza Z. Kapadia
Author: Simon Eaton
Author: Winnie W.Y. Chan
Author: Cheri Nickel
Author: Agostino Pierro
Author: Martin Offringa

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×